Benvenisty A I, Cohen D, Stegall M D, Hardy M A
Department of Surgery, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York 10032.
Transplantation. 1990 Feb;49(2):321-7. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199002000-00019.
Delayed graft function remains a major problem in cadaveric renal allograft transplantation. We have used 2 different immunosuppressive induction regimens in patients with delayed graft function. The first regimen, used in 40 patients from January 1985 to December 1986, consisted of CsA (8 mg/kg/day, orally within 48 hr of cadaveric renal transplantation regardless of graft function), azathioprine (1.5-2.5 mg/kg/day), and steroids (methylprednisolone 375 mg on day 0, then prednisone tapered to 30 mg/day by day 10 with slow tapering to 7.5-10 mg/day over the first 6 months after transplantation). A second regimen, used from January 1987 to March 1989, employed the same doses of azathioprine and steroids; however, OKT3 (5 mg i.v./day for 7-21 days) was administered in the 34 patients who had delayed graft function. CsA was withheld until ATN resolved. The use of OKT3 as induction immunosuppression in patients with ATN led to a significant increase in 1-year graft survival (80% vs. 55%) while markedly decreasing the incidence of rejection episodes (44% vs. 82%) and the duration of nonfunction (9.4 vs. 14.9 days). There were 5 CMV infections in patients treated with OKT3. Antibodies to OKT3 developed in only 1 of 34 patients treated with OKT3. Five of 7 patients who received a second course of OKT3 successfully reversed the rejection episode. Patient survival (89%) was the same in the 2 groups. The benefit of OKT3 on long-term graft survival appears to stem from elimination of early rejection episodes that may be difficult to diagnose in a poorly functioning allograft. We conclude that OKT3 induction provides superior results over CsA induction at doses given in renal allograft recipients with delayed graft function without a significant increase in morbidity or mortality and permits the reuse of OKT3 for treatment of rejection in most cases.
移植肾功能延迟仍然是尸体肾移植中的一个主要问题。我们在移植肾功能延迟的患者中使用了两种不同的免疫抑制诱导方案。第一种方案于1985年1月至1986年12月应用于40例患者,包括环孢素(8mg/kg/天,在尸体肾移植后48小时内口服,无论移植肾功能如何)、硫唑嘌呤(1.5 - 2.5mg/kg/天)和类固醇(第0天静脉注射甲泼尼龙375mg,然后在第10天减至泼尼松30mg/天,并在移植后的前6个月内缓慢减至7.5 - 10mg/天)。第二种方案于1987年1月至1989年3月使用,硫唑嘌呤和类固醇的剂量相同;然而,对于34例移植肾功能延迟的患者给予OKT3(5mg静脉注射/天,共7 - 21天)。环孢素在急性肾小管坏死(ATN)缓解前停用。在ATN患者中使用OKT3作为诱导免疫抑制导致1年移植肾存活率显著提高(80%对55%),同时显著降低排斥反应发生率(44%对82%)和无功能持续时间(9.4天对14.9天)。接受OKT3治疗的患者中有5例发生巨细胞病毒(CMV)感染。在接受OKT3治疗的34例患者中,仅1例产生了抗OKT3抗体。7例接受第二疗程OKT3治疗的患者中有5例成功逆转了排斥反应。两组患者的生存率(89%)相同。OKT3对长期移植肾存活的益处似乎源于消除了在功能不良的移植肾中可能难以诊断的早期排斥反应。我们得出结论,在移植肾功能延迟的肾移植受者中,OKT3诱导方案比环孢素诱导方案效果更佳,且发病率或死亡率无显著增加,并且在大多数情况下允许重复使用OKT3治疗排斥反应。