Center for Genitourinary Reconstruction, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Urology. 2011 Mar;77(3):736-41. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.08.009.
To evaluate the results and quality of life outcomes of transperineal repair using gracilis muscle interposition in patients who were candidates for attempted preservation of bowel and bladder function. There is currently no widely accepted procedure for the treatment of complex RUF, such as those complicated by radiotherapy, previous attempts at repair, or large in size.
Thirteen patients who underwent transperineal repair with gracilis muscle interposition for complex RUF were identified. Records were reviewed for fistula etiology, prior repair, intraoperative findings, hospital course, complications, diversion reversal, and outcome. Follow-up data were gathered from clinic visits and questionnaires.
Preoperative diagnoses included: prostate cancer (PCA) (12) and imperforate anus (1). Treatment for PCA included radical prostatectomy (4); brachytherapy (BT) (3); external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) + BT (3); cryoablation (1); and EBRT + cryoablation (1). Five patients underwent prior unsuccessful repair. There were no intraoperative complications. Postoperative complications included fecal incontinence (3) and bladder neck contracture (1). Nine patients (75%) reported some degree of urinary incontinence, with 2 patients reporting this as significant, defined as incontinence "most of the time." Suprapubic catheters were removed after 6 weeks, and median stomal reversal was at 17.5 weeks (12-28). One patient developed a recurrent RUF. All patients completed quality-of-life questionnaires assessing urinary and fecal outcome. Fecal outcome measures were generally better than urinary, but both were reasonable given the complexity of the situation.
Transperineal repair with gracilis muscle interposition is an effective treatment for selected patients with complex RUF. Our experience demonstrates low morbidity, high success rates, and reasonable bowel and bladder function postoperatively.
评估经会阴修复术联合使用腹直肌间置在有保留肠和膀胱功能的候选患者中治疗复杂直肠阴道瘘(RUF)的效果和生活质量结果。目前,对于复杂 RUF 的治疗,如放射治疗后、先前修复失败或体积较大的 RUF,还没有被广泛接受的治疗方法。
确定了 13 名接受经会阴修复术联合腹直肌间置治疗复杂 RUF 的患者。回顾了瘘管病因、先前修复、术中发现、住院过程、并发症、转流逆转和结果的记录。通过门诊就诊和问卷调查收集随访数据。
术前诊断包括:前列腺癌(PCA)(12 例)和肛门闭锁(1 例)。PCA 的治疗包括根治性前列腺切除术(4 例);近距离放射治疗(BT)(3 例);外照射放疗(EBRT)+BT(3 例);冷冻消融术(1 例);EBRT+冷冻消融术(1 例)。5 例患者先前的修复术失败。术中无并发症。术后并发症包括大便失禁(3 例)和膀胱颈挛缩(1 例)。9 名患者(75%)报告有不同程度的尿失禁,其中 2 名患者认为这是显著的,定义为“大部分时间”失禁。耻骨上导管在 6 周后拔出,中位肛门转流时间为 17.5 周(12-28 周)。1 例患者出现复发性 RUF。所有患者均完成了评估尿便功能的生活质量问卷。大便失禁的评估指标通常优于尿失禁,但考虑到情况的复杂性,两者都是合理的。
经会阴修复术联合腹直肌间置术是治疗复杂 RUF 的有效方法。我们的经验表明,这种方法的发病率低、成功率高,且术后肠和膀胱功能良好。