Department of Radiology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Clin Imaging. 2011 Mar-Apr;35(2):85-93. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.03.002.
To compare direct magnetic resonance galactography (dMRG) and conventional galactography (CGal).
Thirty women underwent CGal and dMRG. Duct localization and the depth of the assumed underlying pathology in CGal and dMRG were analyzed.
Comparing CGal and dMRG, there was no significant difference regarding sector localization, but for depth of pathology (P=.023).
Duct localization with dMRG was possible with the same reliability as with CGal. Thus, dMRG may have the potential to become an alternative method to CGal.
比较直接磁共振乳管造影术（dMRG）和常规乳管造影术（CGal）。
30 名女性接受了 CGal 和 dMRG 检查。分析了 CGal 和 dMRG 中导管定位和假定潜在病变的深度。
与 CGal 相比，dMRG 在扇形定位方面没有显著差异，但在病变深度方面有差异（P=.023）。
dMRG 进行导管定位的可靠性与 CGal 相同。因此，dMRG 可能成为 CGal 的替代方法。
