• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

福提乌斯训练器的可靠性/有效性。

Reliability/Validity of the fortius trainer.

机构信息

School of Chiropractic and Sports Science, Murdoch University, Australia. j.peiff

出版信息

Int J Sports Med. 2011 May;32(5):353-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1271772. Epub 2011 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1055/s-0031-1271772
PMID:21380964
Abstract

This study examined the reliability/validity of power output measured using the Fortius Virtual Reality cycle trainer. 10 cyclists (age: 28±6 years; V˙O (2)max: 60.9±7.2 ml · kg (-1) · min (-1); peak power: 393±82 W) completed three 20 km time trials on a Fortius cycle trainer. During each time trial, power output was measured at 1 Hz using the Fortius internal software and a PowerTap power monitor. Validity calculated for the Fortius trainer; Pearson correlation coefficient (r=0.99; 95% CI: 0.98-0.99; p<0.01) and typical error of estimate (3.5%; 95% CI: 3.2-3.9%), was similar to other established laboratory ergometers. No differences (F (2,16)=0.32; p=0.73) in mean 20 km power were observed between trial 1 (253±46 W), 2 (258±49 W), or 3 (255±50 W). Test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV)) was better between trial 2 and 3 (ICC=1.00 (CI: 0.98-1.00); CV: 1.6% (CI: 1.1-3.3%)) compared with trial 1 and 2 (ICC=0.98 (CI: 0.91-1.00); CV: 3.3% (CI: 2.2-6.4%)). The Fortius cycle trainer is a valid and reliable device for the measurement of power output in cyclists, thus providing an alternative to larger more expensive laboratory ergometers.

摘要

这项研究旨在检验使用 Fortius 虚拟现实自行车训练器测量的输出功率的可靠性/有效性。10 名自行车运动员(年龄:28±6 岁;最大摄氧量(V˙O (2)max):60.9±7.2 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1);最大功率:393±82 W)在 Fortius 自行车训练器上完成了三次 20 公里计时赛。在每次计时赛中,使用 Fortius 内部软件和 PowerTap 功率计以 1 Hz 的频率测量功率输出。Fortius 训练器的有效性计算;Pearson 相关系数(r=0.99;95%CI:0.98-0.99;p<0.01)和估计的典型误差(3.5%;95%CI:3.2-3.9%)与其他已建立的实验室测功计相似。在第一次(253±46 W)、第二次(258±49 W)或第三次(255±50 W)试验中,平均 20 公里功率没有差异(F (2,16)=0.32;p=0.73)。试验间可靠性(组内相关系数(ICC)和变异系数(CV))在第二次和第三次试验(ICC=1.00(CI:0.98-1.00);CV:1.6%(CI:1.1-3.3%))之间优于第一次和第二次试验(ICC=0.98(CI:0.91-1.00);CV:3.3%(CI:2.2-6.4%))。Fortius 自行车训练器是一种用于测量自行车运动员输出功率的有效且可靠的设备,因此提供了一种替代更大、更昂贵的实验室测功计的方法。

相似文献

1
Reliability/Validity of the fortius trainer.福提乌斯训练器的可靠性/有效性。
Int J Sports Med. 2011 May;32(5):353-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1271772. Epub 2011 Mar 4.
2
Reproducibility of a laboratory-based 40-km cycle time-trial on a stationary wind-trainer in highly trained cyclists.在固定风速训练器上进行的基于实验室的40公里自行车计时赛在高水平自行车运动员中的可重复性。
Int J Sports Med. 2003 Oct;24(7):481-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-42012.
3
Reliability analysis of the 3-min all-out exercise test for cycle ergometry.3 分钟全力自行车运动试验的可靠性分析。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Dec;43(12):2375-80. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318224cb0f.
4
Ergometer error and biological variation in power output in a performance test with three cycle ergometers.在使用三台自行车测功仪进行的性能测试中,测功仪误差与功率输出的生物变异。
Int J Sports Med. 2006 Jun;27(6):444-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-865781.
5
Reliability of a combined 3-min constant load and performance cycling test.3分钟恒定负荷与性能骑行组合测试的可靠性
Int J Sports Med. 2003 Jul;24(5):366-71. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-40700.
6
Validity and reliability of the Wattbike cycle ergometer.瓦塔自行车功率计的有效性和可靠性。
Int J Sports Med. 2010 Oct;31(10):731-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1261968. Epub 2010 Jul 27.
7
Reproducibility of a laboratory based 20-km time trial evaluation in competitive cyclists using the Velotron Pro ergometer.使用Velotron Pro功率计对竞技自行车运动员进行基于实验室的20公里计时赛评估的可重复性。
Int J Sports Med. 2007 Nov;28(11):940-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-964977. Epub 2007 May 11.
8
Reliability and validity of field-based measures of leg stiffness and reactive strength index in youths.基于现场的腿部刚度和反应强度指数的可靠性和有效性在青少年中。
J Sports Sci. 2009 Dec;27(14):1565-73. doi: 10.1080/02640410903311572.
9
Reliability of mean power recorded during indoor and outdoor self-paced 40 km cycling time-trials.室内和室外自行节奏40公里自行车计时赛中记录的平均功率的可靠性。
Int J Sports Med. 2001 May;22(4):270-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-13813.
10
The reliability of VO2(peak) determination in healthy females during an incremental arm ergometry test.健康女性在递增式手臂测力计测试中VO2(峰值)测定的可靠性。
Int J Sports Med. 2009 Jul;30(7):509-15. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1202351. Epub 2009 May 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Caveats and Recommendations to Assess the Validity and Reliability of Cycling Power Meters: A Systematic Scoping Review.评估自行车功率计有效性和可靠性的注意事项和建议:系统范围综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jan 5;22(1):386. doi: 10.3390/s22010386.
2
Are the Assioma Favero Power Meter Pedals a Reliable Tool for Monitoring Cycling Power Output?Assioma Favero 功率计脚踏是否是监测骑行功率输出的可靠工具?
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Apr 15;21(8):2789. doi: 10.3390/s21082789.
3
Validity and Reliability of the PowerTap P1 Pedals Power Meter.《PowerTap P1 脚踏功率计的有效性和可靠性》。
J Sports Sci Med. 2018 May 14;17(2):305-311. eCollection 2018 Jun.
4
Prior low- or high-intensity exercise alters pacing strategy, energy system contribution and performance during a 4-km cycling time trial.先前的低强度或高强度运动可改变4公里自行车计时赛中的配速策略、能量系统贡献及运动表现。
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 20;9(10):e110320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110320. eCollection 2014.
5
Effect of time of day on performance, hormonal and metabolic response during a 1000-M cycling time trial.一天中的时间对1000米自行车计时赛期间的运动表现、激素和代谢反应的影响。
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 7;9(10):e109954. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109954. eCollection 2014.
6
Change of muscle activation patterns in uphill cycling of varying slope.不同坡度上坡骑行时肌肉激活模式的变化。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012 Jul;112(7):2615-23. doi: 10.1007/s00421-011-2236-1. Epub 2011 Nov 13.