Lorimier G, Morel B, Georgeacakis C, Reigner B, Rive C, Delaby J, Guntz M
Centre Paul Papin, Angers.
J Chir (Paris). 1990 Jan;127(1):35-7.
The authors report results of prospective study about skin closure of peritonitis. Two groups are compared: Group A: continuous suture + suction drain VS Group B: simple suture at wide intervals of 4 cm. 93 patients have been included with a mean age of 53.2 +/- 23.9 and just before surgery randomized. Two groups are homogeneous. The postoperative parietal complications were respectively 12% in group A versus, 29% group B. There is a significant difference of 5% in favor of group A. Because the little size of groups, the authors conclude that closure of the skin peritonitis with "continuous suture" is not forbidden. This procedure doesn't increase morbidity.
作者报告了一项关于腹膜炎皮肤缝合的前瞻性研究结果。比较了两组:A组:连续缝合+负压引流与B组:间隔4厘米的宽间距单纯缝合。纳入了93例患者,平均年龄为53.2±23.9岁,术前随机分组。两组具有同质性。术后腹壁并发症在A组为12%,而B组为29%。A组有5%的显著优势。由于样本量较小,作者得出结论,“连续缝合”用于腹膜炎皮肤缝合并非禁忌。该方法不会增加发病率。