• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超过五分之四的以诊所为基础的医生有资格获得联邦电子健康记录激励。

More than four in five office-based physicians could qualify for federal electronic health record incentives.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy, School of Public Health and Health Services, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Mar;30(3):472-80. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0932.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0932
PMID:21383366
Abstract

Our analyses of federal survey data show that more than four in five office-based physicians could qualify for new federal incentive payments to encourage the adoption and "meaningful use" of electronic health records, based on the numbers of Medicare or Medicaid patients they see. The incentives are thus likely to accelerate the spread of electronic health records. However, our analyses also indicate that eligibility for the incentives is likely to vary by specialty: 90.6 percent of physicians working in general or family practice or internal medicine could qualify for incentives, but fewer than two-thirds of pediatricians, obstetrician-gynecologists, and psychiatrists may qualify. Eligibility and use will also vary by factors such as size and type of practice; physicians in solo practice are much less likely to use electronic health records than physicians in other practice settings. We suggest actions that policy makers can take to lessen disparities and increase the adoption and meaningful use of electronic health records.

摘要

我们对联邦调查数据的分析表明,根据他们所看 Medicare 或 Medicaid 患者的数量,超过五分之四的基础医疗机构医生有资格获得新的联邦激励性付款,以鼓励采用和“有意义地使用”电子健康记录。因此,这些激励措施可能会加速电子健康记录的普及。然而,我们的分析还表明,获得激励的资格可能因专业而异:从事普通或家庭实践或内科的医生中有 90.6%有资格获得激励,但不到三分之二的儿科医生、妇产科医生和精神科医生可能有资格获得激励。资格和使用情况还将因实践规模和类型等因素而异;个体执业医生使用电子健康记录的可能性远远低于其他执业环境中的医生。我们提出了政策制定者可以采取的行动,以减少差距,增加电子健康记录的采用和有意义的使用。

相似文献

1
More than four in five office-based physicians could qualify for federal electronic health record incentives.超过五分之四的以诊所为基础的医生有资格获得联邦电子健康记录激励。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Mar;30(3):472-80. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0932.
2
Electronic health record systems and intent to apply for meaningful use incentives among office-based physician practices: United States, 2001-2011.电子健康记录系统以及基层医疗医生诊所申请有意义使用激励措施的意向:美国,2001 - 2011年
NCHS Data Brief. 2011 Nov(79):1-8.
3
Most physicians were eligible for federal incentives in 2011, but few had EHR systems that met meaningful-use criteria.2011 年,大多数医生都有资格获得联邦激励,但很少有医生拥有符合“有意义使用”标准的电子健康记录系统。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 May;31(5):1100-7. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1315. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
4
Even when physicians adopt e-prescribing, use of advanced features lags.即使医生采用电子处方,先进功能的使用也滞后。
Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change. 2010 Jul(133):1-5.
5
Florida doctors seeing Medicaid patients show broad interest in federal incentives for adopting electronic health records.佛罗里达州的医生对接受电子健康记录的联邦激励措施表现出浓厚的兴趣。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Aug;30(8):1461-70. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0261.
6
A progress report on electronic health records in U.S. hospitals.美国医院电子健康记录进展报告。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Oct;29(10):1951-7. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0502. Epub 2010 Aug 26.
7
Use and characteristics of electronic health record systems among office-based physician practices: United States, 2001-2013.2001 - 2013年美国门诊医生诊所中电子健康记录系统的使用情况及特点
NCHS Data Brief. 2014 Jan(143):1-8.
8
Meaningful use in radiology.放射学中的有意义使用。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2011 Sep;8(9):657-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2011.03.017.
9
Today's 'meaningful use' standard for medication orders by hospitals may save few lives; later stages may do more.今天医院在药物医嘱方面的“有意义使用”标准可能拯救不了几条生命;但后期阶段可能会产生更大的影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Oct;30(10):2005-12. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0245. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
10
Hospitals ineligible for federal meaningful-use incentives have dismally low rates of adoption of electronic health records.不符合联邦有意义使用激励条件的医院电子病历采用率极低。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Mar;31(3):505-13. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0351.

引用本文的文献

1
Disparities in Primary Care EHR Adoption Rates.初级医疗电子健康记录采用率的差异。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2016 Feb;27(1):327-338. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2016.0016.
2
Electronic Health Record Use a Bitter Pill for Many Physicians.对许多医生来说,使用电子健康记录是件苦差事。
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2016 Jan 1;13(Winter):1d. eCollection 2016.
3
Impact of the HITECH Act on physicians' adoption of electronic health records.《健康信息技术经济与临床健康法案》对医生采用电子健康记录的影响。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Mar;23(2):375-9. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv103. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
4
Variation in electronic health record adoption and readiness for meaningful use: 2008-2011.电子健康记录的采用和实现有意义使用的准备情况的变化:2008-2011 年。
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Jul;28(7):957-64. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2324-x. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
5
Pilot study of meaningful use of electronic health records in radiation oncology.电子病历在放射肿瘤学中的实际应用的初步研究。
J Oncol Pract. 2012 Jul;8(4):219-23. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000382. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
6
Review of quality assessment tools for the evaluation of pharmacoepidemiological safety studies.用于评估药物流行病学安全性研究的质量评估工具综述
BMJ Open. 2012 Sep 25;2(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001362. Print 2012.
7
Awareness and management of chronic disease, insurance status, and health professional shortage areas in the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS): a cross-sectional study.地理和种族间卒中差异原因(REGARDS)研究中的慢性病认知与管理、保险状况和卫生专业短缺领域:一项横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jul 20;12:208. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-208.
8
Benefits and drawbacks of electronic health record systems.电子健康记录系统的优缺点。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2011;4:47-55. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S12985. Epub 2011 May 11.
9
Use of health information technology by office-based physicians: comparison of two contemporaneous public-use physician surveys.门诊医生对健康信息技术的使用:两项同期公开使用的医生调查的比较
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2011;8(Fall):1f. Epub 2011 Oct 1.