• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

强生公司在健康促进方面的最新经验:降低医疗支出,投资回报强劲。

Recent experience in health promotion at Johnson & Johnson: lower health spending, strong return on investment.

机构信息

Thomson Reuters, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Mar;30(3):490-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0806.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0806
PMID:21383368
Abstract

Johnson & Johnson Family of Companies introduced its worksite health promotion program in 1979. The program evolved and is still in place after more than thirty years. We evaluated the program's effect on employees' health risks and health care costs for the period 2002-08. Measured against similar large companies, Johnson & Johnson experienced average annual growth in total medical spending that was 3.7 percentage points lower. Company employees benefited from meaningful reductions in rates of obesity, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, tobacco use, physical inactivity, and poor nutrition. Average annual per employee savings were $565 in 2009 dollars, producing a return on investment equal to a range of $1.88-$3.92 saved for every dollar spent on the program. Because the vast majority of US adults participate in the workforce, positive effects from similar programs could lead to better health and to savings for the nation as a whole.

摘要

强生公司于 1979 年推出了其工作场所健康促进计划。该计划历经多年发展,至今仍在实施。我们评估了该计划对员工健康风险和 2002-08 年期间医疗保健费用的影响。与类似的大公司相比,强生公司的总医疗支出年平均增长率低 3.7 个百分点。公司员工受益于肥胖、高血压、高胆固醇、吸烟、身体活动不足和营养状况不佳的比率显著下降。2009 年,每位员工的平均年度节省额为 565 美元,投资回报率相当于每花费 1 美元用于该计划,就能节省 1.88-3.92 美元。由于绝大多数美国成年人都参与了劳动力市场,类似计划的积极影响可能会提高国民的整体健康水平并节省开支。

相似文献

1
Recent experience in health promotion at Johnson & Johnson: lower health spending, strong return on investment.强生公司在健康促进方面的最新经验:降低医疗支出,投资回报强劲。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Mar;30(3):490-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0806.
2
Impact of worksite wellness intervention on cardiac risk factors and one-year health care costs.工作场所健康干预对心脏危险因素及一年医疗保健费用的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2009 Nov 15;104(10):1389-92. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.07.007. Epub 2009 Sep 26.
3
Using an ounce of prevention: does it reduce health care expenditures and reap pounds of profits? A study of the financial impact of wellness and health risk screening programs.采取一盎司的预防措施:它能降低医疗保健支出并收获数磅利润吗?一项关于健康与健康风险筛查项目财务影响的研究。
J Health Care Finance. 2009 Winter;36(2):1-12.
4
Ten modifiable health risk factors are linked to more than one-fifth of employer-employee health care spending.有 10 个可改变的健康风险因素与超过五分之一的雇主-员工医疗保健支出有关。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Nov;31(11):2474-84. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0819.
5
Influence of a mobile worksite health promotion program on health care costs.流动工作场所健康促进计划对医疗保健成本的影响。
Am J Prev Med. 1993 Nov-Dec;9(6):378-83.
6
Variation of employee benefit costs by age.员工福利成本随年龄的变化。
Soc Secur Bull. 2000;63(4):47-56.
7
A study on the economic impact of bariatric surgery.一项关于减肥手术经济影响的研究。
Am J Manag Care. 2008 Sep;14(9):589-96.
8
Employees are paying for poor health habits.员工们正在为不良健康习惯付出代价。
HRMAGAZINE. 1992 Aug;37(8):52-4, 56, 58.
9
A hospital system's wellness program linked to health plan enrollment cut hospitalizations but not overall costs.医院系统的健康计划与健康计划参与率相关,可降低住院率,但不会降低总体成本。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Mar;32(3):477-85. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0090.
10
A truly healthy bottom line: improving financial results through effective health and productivity programs.真正健康的底线:通过有效的健康与生产力计划提升财务业绩。
Benefits Q. 2008;24(2):7-11.

引用本文的文献

1
Occupational health literacy and work ability: a moderation analysis including interpersonal and organizational factors in healthy organizations.职业健康素养与工作能力:健康组织中人际关系和组织因素的调节分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 7;12:1243138. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1243138. eCollection 2024.
2
Interventions to prevent alcohol use: systematic review of economic evaluations.预防饮酒的干预措施:经济评估的系统综述
BJPsych Open. 2023 Jun 27;9(4):e117. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2023.81.
3
Economics of Team-Based Care for Blood Pressure Control: Updated Community Guide Systematic Review.
基于团队的护理经济学:血压控制社区指南系统评价更新。
Am J Prev Med. 2023 Oct;65(4):735-754. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.04.013. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
4
Employee Perspectives on Onsite Health Clinics in Semiconductor Company in South Korea.韩国半导体公司内部医疗诊所员工观点调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 27;19(3):1433. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031433.
5
A Scoping Review of Economic Evaluations of Workplace Wellness Programs.工作场所健康计划的经济评价:范围综述。
Public Health Rep. 2021 Nov-Dec;136(6):671-684. doi: 10.1177/0033354920976557. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
6
Organizational and Individual Outcomes of Health Promotion Strategies-A Review of Empirical Research.健康促进策略的组织和个人结果——实证研究综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 6;18(2):383. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020383.
7
Eight-Year Health Risks Trend Analysis of a Comprehensive Workplace Health Promotion Program.八年综合职场健康促进计划的健康风险趋势分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 16;17(24):9426. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249426.
8
Identifying contexts and mechanisms in multiple behavior change interventions affecting smoking cessation success: a rapid realist review.识别影响戒烟成功的多种行为改变干预措施中的情境和机制:快速务实综述。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 12;20(1):918. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08973-2.
9
Health and Economics of Lifestyle Medicine Strategies.生活方式医学策略的健康与经济学
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2020 Feb 22;14(3):274-277. doi: 10.1177/1559827620905782. eCollection 2020 May-Jun.
10
The Effects of Workplace Nature-Based Interventions on the Mental Health and Well-Being of Employees: A Systematic Review.基于自然的工作场所干预对员工心理健康和幸福感的影响:一项系统综述。
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Apr 28;11:323. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00323. eCollection 2020.