Bilgici A, Ulusoy H, Kuru O, Canturk F
Ondokuz Mayis University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Samsun, Turkey.
Bratisl Lek Listy. 2010;111(12):659-65.
This study aimed to compare the efficacy of ultrasound treatment to local corticosteroid injection plus splinting in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). There is still limited knowledge on the efficacy of conservative treatment options for CTS.
Fourty-nine hands of 34 patients with CTS were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly assigned to the ultrasound treatment (group A) or local corticosteroid injection plus splinting (group B). The primary outcome measures included clinical parameters such as symptoms severity score, visual analogue scale (VAS) pain, functional status score, grip strength and two-point discrimination. The secondary outcome measures were the electrophysiological tests. The examinations were performed at baseline, and then at 4th and 8th weeks.
At the end of the study, a statistically significant improvement was obtained in all clinical parameters in the group B: VAS pain, severity of symptoms, functional status, grip strength (p < 0.001 for each) and two-point discrimination (p < 0.016). Also the group A showed significant improvements in all clinical parameters (p < 0.001 for each), except for the grip strength. Additionally, significant improvements in the median nerve sensory conduction velocity and distal motor latency were also found in both groups at the end of the 8 week follow-up period. There was no significant difference between the groups in the primary and secondary outcome measures, except for the grip strength.
Both ultrasound treatment and corticosteroid injection plus splinting were effective on the clinical symptoms and the electrophysiological findings of CTS. Thus, the ultrasound therapy may be an alternative treatment for CTS, particularly in patient who do not accept injection or splinting (Tab. 3, Fig. 2, Ref. 36).
本研究旨在比较超声治疗与局部注射皮质类固醇联合夹板固定治疗腕管综合征(CTS)的疗效。目前对于CTS保守治疗方案的疗效仍知之甚少。
34例CTS患者的49只手纳入本研究。患者被随机分为超声治疗组(A组)和局部注射皮质类固醇联合夹板固定组(B组)。主要观察指标包括临床参数,如症状严重程度评分、视觉模拟评分法(VAS)疼痛评分、功能状态评分、握力和两点辨别觉。次要观察指标为电生理检查。检查在基线时进行,然后在第4周和第8周进行。
在研究结束时,B组所有临床参数均有统计学意义的改善:VAS疼痛评分、症状严重程度、功能状态、握力(每项p < 0.001)和两点辨别觉(p < 0.016)。A组除握力外,所有临床参数也有显著改善(每项p < 0.001)。此外,在8周随访期结束时,两组正中神经感觉传导速度和远端运动潜伏期也有显著改善。除握力外,两组主要和次要观察指标之间无显著差异。
超声治疗和皮质类固醇注射联合夹板固定对CTS的临床症状和电生理结果均有效。因此,超声治疗可能是CTS的一种替代治疗方法,特别是对于不接受注射或夹板固定的患者(表3,图2,参考文献36)。