• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparative effectiveness of the SNaP™ Wound Care System.SNaP™ 伤口护理系统的比较效果。
Int Wound J. 2011 Apr;8(2):196-205. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2011.00775.x. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
2
A Retrospective, Cost-minimization Analysis of Disposable and Traditional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Medicare Paid Claims.一次性与传统负压伤口治疗医疗保险赔付的回顾性成本最小化分析
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2018 Jan;64(1):26-33.
3
Negative pressure wound therapy for treating foot wounds in people with diabetes mellitus.负压伤口治疗在糖尿病患者足部伤口治疗中的应用
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 17;10(10):CD010318. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010318.pub3.
4
The SNaP Wound Care System: a case series using a novel ultraportable negative pressure wound therapy device for the treatment of diabetic lower extremity wounds.SNaP伤口护理系统:一个使用新型超便携式负压伤口治疗设备治疗糖尿病下肢伤口的病例系列。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010 Jul 1;4(4):825-30. doi: 10.1177/193229681000400409.
5
Evaluation of wound care and health-care use costs in patients with diabetic foot ulcers treated with negative pressure wound therapy versus advanced moist wound therapy.负压伤口治疗与先进湿性伤口治疗对糖尿病足溃疡患者伤口护理及医疗费用的评估。
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2014 Mar;104(2):147-53. doi: 10.7547/0003-0538-104.2.147.
6
Resource utilization and economic costs of care based on a randomized trial of vacuum-assisted closure therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot wounds.基于负压封闭引流疗法治疗糖尿病足伤口随机试验的资源利用与护理经济成本
Am J Surg. 2008 Jun;195(6):782-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.06.023. Epub 2008 Mar 26.
7
Disposable NPWT device to facilitate early patient discharge following complex DFU.一次性负压伤口治疗装置,以促进复杂糖尿病足溃疡患者的早期出院。
J Wound Care. 2012 Apr;21(4):180, 182. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2012.21.4.180.
8
Comparative effectiveness of mechanically and electrically powered negative pressure wound therapy devices: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.机械和电动负压伤口治疗设备的比较效果:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Wound Repair Regen. 2012 May-Jun;20(3):332-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2012.00780.x.
9
Initial clinical experience using a novel ultraportable negative pressure wound therapy device.使用新型超便携式负压伤口治疗设备的初步临床经验。
Wounds. 2010 Sep;22(9):230-6.
10
Negative pressure wound therapy for skin grafts and surgical wounds healing by primary intention.负压伤口治疗用于通过一期愈合的皮肤移植和手术伤口愈合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18(4):CD009261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009261.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Updates on Recent Clinical Assessment of Commercial Chronic Wound Care Products.最新商业慢性伤口护理产品临床评估进展。
Adv Healthc Mater. 2023 Oct;12(25):e2300556. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202300556. Epub 2023 Jul 23.
2
The smart negative pressure (SNaP) wound care system: A case series from Singapore.智能负压(SNaP)伤口护理系统:来自新加坡的一组病例。
Int Wound J. 2019 Aug;16(4):891-896. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13114. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
3
Design, testing, and scale-up of medical devices for global health: negative pressure wound therapy and non-surgical male circumcision in Rwanda.面向全球健康的医疗设备的设计、测试及扩大应用:卢旺达的负压伤口治疗与男性非手术包皮环切术
Global Health. 2015 May 12;11:20. doi: 10.1186/s12992-015-0101-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of negative pressure wound therapy with an ultraportable mechanically powered device vs. traditional electrically powered device for the treatment of chronic lower extremity ulcers: a multicenter randomized-controlled trial.负压伤口疗法联合超便携机械动力设备与传统电动设备治疗慢性下肢溃疡的疗效比较:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Wound Repair Regen. 2011 Mar-Apr;19(2):173-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2010.00658.x.
2
Evaluation of chronic wound treatment with the SNaP wound care system versus modern dressing protocols.采用 SNaP 伤口护理系统与现代敷料方案治疗慢性伤口的评估。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Oct;126(4):1253-1261. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ea4559.
3
Medicare program; home health prospective payment system; rate update for calendar year 2010. Final rule.医疗保险计划;家庭健康前瞻性支付系统;2010 年日历年费率更新。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2009 Nov 10;74(216):58077-183.
4
Vacuum-assisted closure of wounds and anxiety.伤口的负压封闭引流与焦虑
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2008;42(4):202-5. doi: 10.1080/02844310802091586.
5
Vacuum assisted closure: recommendations for use. A consensus document.负压封闭引流技术:使用建议。一份共识文件。
Int Wound J. 2008 Jul;5 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):iii-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2008.00537.x.
6
Clinical outcome of diabetic foot ulcers treated with negative pressure wound therapy and the transition from acute care to home care.负压伤口治疗糖尿病足溃疡的临床结果以及从急性护理向家庭护理的过渡
Int Wound J. 2008 Jun;5 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):10-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2008.00466.x.
7
A systematic review of topical negative pressure therapy for acute and chronic wounds.急性和慢性伤口局部负压治疗的系统评价
Br J Surg. 2008 Jun;95(6):685-92. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6238.
8
Resource utilization and economic costs of care based on a randomized trial of vacuum-assisted closure therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot wounds.基于负压封闭引流疗法治疗糖尿病足伤口随机试验的资源利用与护理经济成本
Am J Surg. 2008 Jun;195(6):782-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.06.023. Epub 2008 Mar 26.
9
Negative pressure wound therapy: a vacuum of evidence?负压伤口治疗:证据空白?
Arch Surg. 2008 Feb;143(2):189-96. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2007.54.
10
Negative pressure wound therapy: potential publication bias caused by lack of access to unpublished study results data.负压伤口治疗:因无法获取未发表研究结果数据而可能导致的发表偏倚。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Feb 11;8:4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-4.

SNaP™ 伤口护理系统的比较效果。

Comparative effectiveness of the SNaP™ Wound Care System.

机构信息

Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

Int Wound J. 2011 Apr;8(2):196-205. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2011.00775.x. Epub 2011 Mar 8.

DOI:10.1111/j.1742-481X.2011.00775.x
PMID:21385320
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7951006/
Abstract

Diabetic lower extremity wounds cause substantial burden to healthcare systems, costing tens of thousands of dollars per episode. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) devices have been shown to be cost-effective at treating these wounds, but the traditional devices use bulky electrical pumps that require a durable medical equipment rental-based procurement process. The Spiracur SNaP™ Wound Care System is an ultraportable NPWT system that does not use an electric pump and is fully disposable. It has superior healing compared to standard of care with modern dressings and comparable healing to traditional NPWT devices while giving patients greater mobility and giving clinicians a simpler procurement process. We used a mathematical model to analyse the costs of the SNaP™ system and compare them to standard of care and electrically powered NPWT devices. When compared to standard of care, the SNaP™ system saves over $9000 per wound treated and more than doubles the number of patients healed. The SNaP system has similar healing time to powered NPWT devices, but saves $2300 in Medicare payments or $2800 for private payers per wound treated. Our analysis shows that the SNaP™ system could save substantial treatment costs in addition to allowing patients greater freedom and mobility.

摘要

糖尿病下肢伤口给医疗系统带来了巨大的负担,每个伤口的治疗费用都高达数万美元。负压伤口治疗(NPWT)设备已被证明在治疗这些伤口方面具有成本效益,但传统设备使用庞大的电动泵,需要基于耐用医疗设备租赁的采购流程。Spiracur SNaP™ 伤口护理系统是一种超便携的 NPWT 系统,它不使用电动泵,完全一次性使用。与现代敷料的标准治疗相比,它具有更好的愈合效果,与传统 NPWT 设备的愈合效果相当,同时为患者提供更大的活动自由度,并为临床医生提供更简单的采购流程。我们使用数学模型分析了 SNaP™ 系统的成本,并将其与标准治疗和电动 NPWT 设备进行了比较。与标准治疗相比,SNaP™ 系统每治疗一个伤口可节省超过 9000 美元,并使治愈的患者数量增加一倍以上。SNaP 系统与电动 NPWT 设备的愈合时间相似,但可节省 Medicare 支付的 2300 美元或私人支付者每治疗一个伤口的 2800 美元。我们的分析表明,SNaP™ 系统除了让患者更自由、更灵活之外,还可以节省大量的治疗费用。