Evaluation of informatics systems: beyond RCTs and beyond the hospital.
作者信息
Lehmannm Harold, Ohno-Machado Lucila
出版信息
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Mar-Apr;18(2):110-1. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000145.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Evaluation of informatics systems: beyond RCTs and beyond the hospital.信息系统评估：超越随机对照试验及医院范畴
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Mar-Apr;18(2):110-1. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000145.
2
Comparative effectiveness research and medical informatics.比较疗效研究与医学信息学。
Am J Med. 2010 Dec;123(12 Suppl 1):e32-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.10.006.
3
Randomized controlled trials and comparative effectiveness research.随机对照试验和比较效果研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Dec 1;30(34):4194-201. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.42.2352. Epub 2012 Oct 15.
4
The role of technology in enhancing evidence-based practice, education, heathcare quality, and patient outcomes: a call for randomized controlled trials and comparative effectiveness research.技术在加强循证实践、教育、医疗质量及患者治疗效果方面的作用：呼吁开展随机对照试验和比较效果研究。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2012 Apr;9(2):63-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2012.00245.x. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
5
Commentary: Clinical informatics.
Med Care. 2012 Jul;50 Suppl:S36-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318257ddeb.
6
Cluster randomized trials in comparative effectiveness research: randomizing hospitals to test methods for prevention of healthcare-associated infections.在比较有效性研究中的整群随机试验：将医院随机分组以测试预防医源性感染的方法。
Med Care. 2010 Jun;48(6 Suppl):S52-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181dbebcf.
7
Leveraging comparative effectiveness research to improve the quality of multidisciplinary care for breast cancer patients.
Cancer Treat Res. 2015;164:15-30. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-12553-4_2.
8
Can observational studies approximate RCTs?
Value Health. 2012 Mar-Apr;15(2):215-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.01.003. Epub 2012 Feb 18.
9
Methodology for comparative effectiveness research: potential and limitations.比较效果研究的方法：潜力与局限
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Dec 1;30(34):4185-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.44.8233. Epub 2012 Oct 15.
10
Postrandomization Confounding Challenges the Applicability of Randomized Clinical Trials in Comparative Effectiveness Research.随机化后混杂因素对随机对照试验在比较效果研究中的适用性提出了挑战。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2017 Apr 20;130(8):993-996. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.204117.
引用本文的文献
1
"Reducing unnecessary testing in a CPOE system through implementation of a targeted CDS intervention".通过实施有针对性的 CDS 干预来减少 CPOE 系统中的不必要检测。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Apr 8;13:43. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-43.
2
Guiding the design of evaluations of innovations in health informatics: a framework and a case study of the SMArt SHARP evaluation.指导健康信息学创新评估的设计：一个框架及SMArt SHARP评估的案例研究
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2012;2012:1375-84. Epub 2012 Nov 3.
3
A hybrid open-access model to bridge the publishing divide and reach out to a broader community.一种混合开放获取模式，以弥合出版差距并接触更广泛的群体。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 May 1;18(3):210-1. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000254.
本文引用的文献
1
AMIA's realigned strategic plan.美国医学信息学会重新调整的战略计划。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Mar-Apr;18(2):203-8. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000103.
2
The case for randomized controlled trials to assess the impact of clinical information systems.评估临床信息系统影响的随机对照试验案例。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Mar-Apr;18(2):173-80. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.010306. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
3
Why observational studies should be among the tools used in comparative effectiveness research.为什么观察性研究应该成为比较有效性研究中使用的工具之一。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Oct;29(10):1818-25. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0666.
4
A national agenda for public health informatics: summarized recommendations from the 2001 AMIA Spring Congress.国家公共卫生信息学议程：2001年美国医学信息学会春季大会总结建议
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001 Nov-Dec;8(6):535-45. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2001.0080535.
Zotero 插件