Suppr超能文献

如何治疗系统性轻链淀粉样变性患者?心脏淀粉样变性患者与非心脏淀粉样变性患者接受大剂量美法仑、低剂量化疗与无化疗的比较。

How to treat patients with systemic amyloid light chain amyloidosis? Comparison of high-dose melphalan, low-dose chemotherapy and no chemotherapy in patients with or without cardiac amyloidosis.

机构信息

Nephrology Center, Toranomon Hospital, 2-2-2, Toranomon, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-8470, Japan.

出版信息

Clin Exp Nephrol. 2011 Aug;15(4):486-92. doi: 10.1007/s10157-011-0426-0. Epub 2011 Mar 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

High-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation (HDM) is an effective treatment for systemic amyloid light chain (AL) amyloidosis but the eligibility criteria exclude many patients with this disorder. The aim of this study was to determine appropriate treatment strategies for systemic AL amyloidosis according to each patient's clinical condition in Japan.

METHODS

Historical cohort study. Fifty-three patients with systemic AL amyloidosis (those with malignancies were excluded) were treated in our hospital with HDM (15 patients), melphalan + prednisolone (MP) (17 patients), vincristine + adriamycin + dexamethasone (VAD) (11 patients), or supportive treatment (no chemotherapy, 10 patients). We compared the survival rates among these treatment groups.

RESULTS

Mean survival was significantly longer in the HDM group than in the other three groups (P < 0.01, log-rank test). This trend remained the same when patients were divided into those with and without cardiac amyloid involvement. Furthermore, in patients with heart involvement, survival in the VAD therapy group was significantly inferior to that in the MP therapy group (P < 0.01 by log-rank test). Significant factors related to the survival rate included the presence or absence of heart involvement and treatment modality.

CONCLUSIONS

HDM should be considered the treatment of choice in eligible patients with systemic AL amyloidosis even in the presence of cardiac amyloidosis. If HDM is not eligible, indications for VAD therapy should be carefully evaluated in patients with cardiac amyloidosis.

摘要

背景

大剂量美法仑和自体干细胞移植(HDM)是治疗系统性轻链(AL)淀粉样变性的有效方法,但入选标准排除了许多患有该疾病的患者。本研究旨在根据日本患者的临床状况确定系统性 AL 淀粉样变性的适当治疗策略。

方法

历史队列研究。53 例系统性 AL 淀粉样变性患者(排除有恶性肿瘤的患者)在我院接受 HDM(15 例)、美法仑+泼尼松(MP)(17 例)、长春新碱+多柔比星+地塞米松(VAD)(11 例)或支持治疗(无化疗,10 例)。我们比较了这些治疗组的生存率。

结果

HDM 组的平均生存时间明显长于其他三组(P<0.01,对数秩检验)。当患者分为有心脏淀粉样变和无心脏淀粉样变两组时,这一趋势仍然存在。此外,在有心脏受累的患者中,VAD 治疗组的生存时间明显劣于 MP 治疗组(对数秩检验,P<0.01)。与生存率相关的显著因素包括心脏受累的存在与否以及治疗方式。

结论

即使存在心脏淀粉样变,对于符合条件的系统性 AL 淀粉样变性患者,也应考虑 HDM 作为治疗选择。如果不适合 HDM,则应仔细评估 VAD 治疗在有心脏淀粉样变患者中的适应证。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验