• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[药物洗脱支架时代冠状动脉旁路移植术的适应证]

[Indications for coronary artery bypass grafting in the DES era].

作者信息

Fukui Toshihiro, Takanashi Shuichiro

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Sakakibara Heart Institute.

出版信息

Nihon Rinsho. 2011 Feb;69(2):259-64.

PMID:21387673
Abstract

Several treatments for coronary artery disease have been developed. Current techniques for both coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have improved the outcomes after procedures. However, patients referred for CABG have been changing because of the recent advancement of PCI. The number of patients referred for CABG has decreased; furthermore, those patients have significant comorbid conditions and multiple severe coronary artery disease. Several randomized controlled clinical trials demonstrated the superiority of CABG regarding major adverse cardiac and cerebral events to PCI. The selection of these two invasive therapies including hybrid approach should be done by both patients' clinical condition and anatomical characteristics of coronary artery.

摘要

已经开发出几种治疗冠状动脉疾病的方法。目前冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的技术都改善了术后的治疗效果。然而,由于PCI的最新进展,转诊接受CABG的患者一直在变化。转诊接受CABG的患者数量减少;此外,这些患者有明显的合并症和多处严重冠状动脉疾病。几项随机对照临床试验证明,在主要不良心脑血管事件方面,CABG优于PCI。包括杂交手术在内的这两种侵入性治疗方法的选择应根据患者的临床状况和冠状动脉的解剖特征来进行。

相似文献

1
[Indications for coronary artery bypass grafting in the DES era].[药物洗脱支架时代冠状动脉旁路移植术的适应证]
Nihon Rinsho. 2011 Feb;69(2):259-64.
2
Current clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和冠状动脉旁路移植术的当前临床疗效。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Aug;86(2):496-503; discussion 503. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.03.060.
3
Coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary artery intervention in patients on chronic hemodialysis: does a drug-eluting stent have an impact on clinical outcome?慢性血液透析患者的冠状动脉搭桥手术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:药物洗脱支架对临床结局有影响吗?
J Card Surg. 2009 May-Jun;24(3):234-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2008.00789.x.
4
Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease: one-year outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary artery intervention with drug-eluting stent.无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病治疗的随机对照试验的荟萃分析:冠状动脉旁路移植术与药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的一年结局
J Card Surg. 2012 Mar;27(2):152-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2011.01410.x. Epub 2012 Feb 26.
5
Coronary artery bypass surgery is superior to percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents for patients with chronic renal failure on hemodialysis.对于接受血液透析的慢性肾衰竭患者,冠状动脉旁路移植术优于药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Jun;89(6):1896-900; discussion 1900. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.02.080.
6
Outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.多支冠状动脉疾病患者冠状动脉搭桥术与药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的疗效比较
Circulation. 2007 Sep 11;116(11 Suppl):I200-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.681148.
7
Meta-analysis of four randomized controlled trials on long-term outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting for multivessel coronary artery disease.四项关于多支冠状动脉疾病冠状动脉搭桥术与经皮冠状动脉介入支架置入术长期预后的随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2008 May 1;101(9):1259-62. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.12.026. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
8
Long-term safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting and coronary artery bypass surgery for multivessel coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis with 5-year patient-level data from the ARTS, ERACI-II, MASS-II, and SoS trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗联合支架置入术与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗多支冠状动脉疾病的长期安全性和疗效:一项基于ARTS、ERACI-II、MASS-II和SoS试验5年患者水平数据的荟萃分析。
Circulation. 2008 Sep 9;118(11):1146-54. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.752147. Epub 2008 Aug 25.
9
Meta-analysis of studies comparing coronary artery bypass grafting with drug-eluting stenting in patients with diabetes mellitus and multivessel coronary artery disease.比较糖尿病合并多支血管病变患者行冠状动脉旁路移植术与药物洗脱支架置入术的研究的荟萃分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2010 Jun 1;105(11):1540-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.01.009. Epub 2010 Apr 8.
10
Revascularization in the high-risk patient: multivessel disease.高危患者的血运重建:多支血管病变
Minerva Cardioangiol. 2007 Oct;55(5):579-92.