Department of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Eleanor Rathbone Building, Bedford Street South, Liverpool, UK.
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2011 Apr;59(2):146-64. doi: 10.1080/00207144.2011.546180.
Due to several well-documented problems, hypnosis as a forensic interviewing tool has been largely replaced by the cognitive interview; however, the latter is problematic in time and complexity. This article builds on previous research showing that some procedures used in traditional hypnotic forensic interviewing might still be useful in developing alternative procedures for use in investigative interviewing. Two experiments are described that include a focused meditation with eye-closure technique with similarities to conventional hypnotic induction but without the label of hypnosis. In the first, focused meditation was comparable to a context reinstatement, or revivification, technique in facilitating memory in children aged 6 to 7 without increasing errors or inflating confidence. In the second, when used in combination with context reinstatement, focused meditation was resistant to the effects of misleading information in adults. Implications are discussed.
由于存在一些记录在案的问题，催眠作为一种法庭讯问工具在很大程度上已经被认知访谈所取代；然而，后者在时间和复杂性方面存在问题。本文建立在先前的研究基础上，该研究表明，传统催眠法庭讯问中使用的一些程序可能仍然有助于为调查讯问开发替代程序。本文描述了两项实验，其中包括一项带有闭眼技术的集中冥想，该技术与传统催眠诱导相似，但没有催眠的标签。在第一项实验中，集中冥想与一种情境再现或复活技术相当，有助于促进 6 至 7 岁儿童的记忆，而不会增加错误或夸大信心。在第二项实验中，当与情境再现结合使用时，集中冥想可以抵抗误导信息对成年人的影响。本文讨论了这些结果的含义。
