School of Immunity, Infection and Inflammation School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Birmingham, UK.
Clin Exp Immunol. 2011 May;164(2):218-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2011.04367.x. Epub 2011 Mar 10.
Immunoglobulin G (IgG) is a potent neutrophil stimulus, particularly when presented as anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody (ANCA) in ANCA-associated vasculitis. We assessed whether IgG subclasses had differential effects on neutrophil activation and whether differences were dependent on specific Fc-receptor engagement. Using a physiologically relevant flow model, we compared adhesion of neutrophils to different subclasses of normal IgG coated onto solid surfaces, with adhesion of neutrophils treated with different subclasses of soluble ANCA IgG to P-selectin surfaces or endothelial cells (EC). Normal IgG captured flowing neutrophils efficiently in the order IgG3 > IgG1 > IgG2 > IgG4. Fc-receptor blockade reduced capture, IgG3 being more dependent on CD16 and IgG1/2 on CD32. Blockade of the integrin CD18 reduced neutrophil spreading, while inhibition of calcium-dependent signalling reduced both capture and spreading, suggesting that both were active processes. Neutrophils treated with ANCA IgG subclasses 1, 3 and 4 showed stabilization of adhesion to P-selectin surfaces and EC. ANCA changed neutrophil behaviour from rolling to static adhesion and the potency of the subclasses followed the same pattern as above: IgG3 > IgG1 > IgG4. Blockade of Fc receptors resulted in neutrophils continuing to roll, i.e. they were not ANCA-activated; differential utilization of Fc receptor by particular IgG subclasses was not as apparent as during neutrophil capture by normal IgG. IgG3 is the most effective subclass for inducing neutrophil adhesion and altered behaviour, irrespective of whether the IgG is surface bound or docks onto neutrophil surface antigens prior to engaging Fc receptors. Engagement of Fc receptors underpins these responses; the dominant Fc receptor depends on IgG subclass.
免疫球蛋白 G(IgG)是一种强效的中性粒细胞刺激物,尤其是在抗中性粒细胞胞质抗体(ANCA)相关血管炎中作为 ANCA 存在时。我们评估了 IgG 亚类是否对中性粒细胞激活有不同的影响,以及差异是否取决于特定 Fc 受体的结合。我们使用生理相关的流动模型,比较了涂覆在固体表面上的不同正常 IgG 亚类对中性粒细胞的黏附,以及用不同可溶性 ANCA IgG 亚类处理的中性粒细胞对 P-选择素表面或内皮细胞(EC)的黏附。正常 IgG 以 IgG3 > IgG1 > IgG2 > IgG4 的顺序有效地捕获流动中的中性粒细胞。Fc 受体阻断减少了捕获,IgG3 更依赖于 CD16,而 IgG1/2 则依赖于 CD32。整合素 CD18 的阻断减少了中性粒细胞的铺展,而钙依赖性信号的抑制减少了捕获和铺展,这表明这两种过程都是活跃的。用 ANCA IgG 亚类 1、3 和 4 处理的中性粒细胞显示出对 P-选择素表面和 EC 的黏附稳定化。ANCA 将中性粒细胞的行为从滚动变为静态黏附,亚类的效力遵循与上述相同的模式:IgG3 > IgG1 > IgG4。Fc 受体的阻断导致中性粒细胞继续滚动,即它们没有被 ANCA 激活;特定 IgG 亚类对 Fc 受体的不同利用不如在正常 IgG 捕获中性粒细胞时明显。IgG3 是诱导中性粒细胞黏附和改变行为最有效的亚类,无论 IgG 是表面结合还是在与 Fc 受体结合之前与中性粒细胞表面抗原结合。Fc 受体的结合是这些反应的基础;主要的 Fc 受体取决于 IgG 亚类。