Suppr超能文献

当前在管理严重银屑病患者方面应用国民保健署卫生技术评估机构(NICE)指南的情况:在英格兰七个国家卫生服务机构专科皮肤科单位中针对 NICE 指南进行的临床审核。

Current application of National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidance in the management of patients with severe psoriasis: a clinical audit against NICE guidance in seven National Health Service specialist dermatology units in England.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Whipps Cross Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Clin Exp Dermatol. 2011 Aug;36(6):602-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2010.04011.x. Epub 2011 Mar 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis affects 1-2% of the U.K. population, with 20-30% of those affected having severe psoriasis managed with systemic therapies. Biological agents are a useful option when other systemic therapies have failed. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) in the U.K. has published three sets of guidance relating to the use of biological agents.

AIM

To establish whether biological agents were being used in line with NICE guidance.

METHODS

The study was conducted in seven specialist dermatology units, and involved the retrospective collection of data from patients treated with biological agents since the introduction of the NICE guidance.

RESULTS

In total, 176 patients with 212 episodes of treatment were included in the study. Biologics were started for appropriately severe disease in 85% of cases (n = 180) and only after failure, intolerance or contraindication to standard systemic therapies in 97% of cases (n = 206). Etanercept was discontinued appropriately in responders before week 24 in only 12% (five of 60 responders). Across all agents, 40% (72 of 178 with continuity status) were continued on treatment despite not achieving an adequate response according to NICE criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

In the seven sites audited, compliance with national guidance was entirely appropriate in terms of therapy initiation; however, the requirement to discontinue etanercept in responders was rarely followed. Similarly, discontinuation of biologicals in nonresponders was not routine practice. This may indicate a reluctance of both patients and clinicians to withdraw an at least partly effective therapy from these refractory patients.

摘要

背景

银屑病影响英国人口的 1-2%,其中 20-30%的患者患有严重银屑病,采用全身治疗。当其他全身治疗失败时,生物制剂是一种有用的选择。英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)已发布三套与生物制剂使用相关的指南。

目的

确定生物制剂的使用是否符合 NICE 指南。

方法

本研究在七个皮肤科专科单位进行,涉及回顾性收集自 NICE 指南发布以来接受生物制剂治疗的患者的数据。

结果

共有 176 名患者的 212 次治疗纳入研究。85%(n=180)的病例因严重疾病开始使用生物制剂,97%(n=206)的病例仅在标准全身治疗失败、不耐受或禁忌后开始使用。仅 12%(5/60)的应答者在第 24 周前停止了依那西普的治疗(n=5)。在所有药物中,40%(n=178 例中有连续性状态)的患者尽管不符合 NICE 标准,但仍继续接受治疗。

结论

在审核的七个地点,从治疗开始的角度来看,遵守国家指南是完全恰当的;然而,很少有应答者遵循停止依那西普的要求。同样,非应答者停止生物制剂也不是常规做法。这可能表明患者和临床医生都不愿意从这些难治性患者中撤出至少部分有效的治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验