• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[泌尿肿瘤学中的药物经济学:质量调整生命年的概念]

[Pharmacoeconomics in uro-oncology: the concept of QALYs].

作者信息

Poulsen Nautrup B

机构信息

EAH-Consulting, Heimbacher Straße 19, 52428 Jülich, Deutschland.

出版信息

Urologe A. 2011 Dec;50(12):1573-7. doi: 10.1007/s00120-011-2731-3.

DOI:10.1007/s00120-011-2731-3
PMID:22159702
Abstract

The QALY (quality-adjusted life year) is often used in pharmacoeconomic evaluations. It combines the two dimensions 'quality of life' and 'life expectancy' into one index. Quality of life is expressed as a utility, corresponding to a value between 0 (death) and 1 (perfect health). Life expectancy is then multiplied by the utility corresponding to the quality of life of the respective life time. Accordingly, 1 QALY corresponds to 1 year in perfect health (1 year multiplied by utility 1) or 2 years with a quality of life reduced by 50% (2 years multiplied by utility 0.5). Results of pharmacoeconomic evaluations are often reported as additional costs in relation to the added value of a new treatment, expressed as cost per additional QALY gained for the patient with the new therapeutic intervention. The main advantage of the QALY concept is its validity for all patients and indications. And the use of benefit measures which are not restricted to a specific indication is most important for resource allocation, i.e. to avoid that varying amounts of money are paid for the same health benefit in different disease areas.

摘要

质量调整生命年(QALY)常用于药物经济学评估。它将“生活质量”和“预期寿命”这两个维度整合为一个指标。生活质量用效用表示,对应于0(死亡)到1(完美健康)之间的值。然后,预期寿命乘以相应生命时段生活质量对应的效用。因此,1个QALY相当于1年的完美健康(1年乘以效用1)或2年生活质量降低50%的情况(2年乘以效用0.5)。药物经济学评估结果通常报告为与新治疗附加值相关的额外成本,以新治疗干预为患者获得的每增加1个QALY的成本来表示。QALY概念的主要优点是其对所有患者和适应症都有效。并且使用不限于特定适应症的效益衡量指标对于资源分配最为重要,即避免在不同疾病领域为相同的健康效益支付不同数量的资金。

相似文献

1
[Pharmacoeconomics in uro-oncology: the concept of QALYs].[泌尿肿瘤学中的药物经济学:质量调整生命年的概念]
Urologe A. 2011 Dec;50(12):1573-7. doi: 10.1007/s00120-011-2731-3.
2
[Evaluation of cancer therapy from the perspective of a statutory health insurance].从法定健康保险的角度评估癌症治疗
Urologe A. 2011 Dec;50(12):1584-90. doi: 10.1007/s00120-011-2733-1.
3
Social value of a quality-adjusted life year (QALY) in Spain: the point of view of oncologists.西班牙质量调整生命年(QALY)的社会价值:肿瘤学家的观点。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2014 Oct;16(10):914-20. doi: 10.1007/s12094-014-1170-1. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
4
Cost-utility analysis.成本效用分析
BMJ. 1993 Oct 2;307(6908):859-62. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6908.859.
5
[Oncology caught between economics and efficiency].肿瘤学在经济与效率之间左右为难
Med Klin (Munich). 2000 Jun;95 Suppl 1:1.
6
Health care economic analyses and value-based medicine.医疗保健经济分析与价值医疗
Surv Ophthalmol. 2003 Mar-Apr;48(2):204-23. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6257(02)00457-5.
7
Effect of obesity on cost per quality-adjusted life years gained following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in elective degenerative pathology.肥胖对择期退行性病变行颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后每获得一个质量调整生命年的成本的影响。
Spine J. 2016 Nov;16(11):1342-1350. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.06.023. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
8
The QALY--a measure of social value rather than individual utility?
Health Econ. 1994 Mar-Apr;3(2):89-93. doi: 10.1002/hec.4730030205.
9
[Relevance of pharmacoeconomic analyses to price and reimbursement decisions in Austria].[药物经济学分析与奥地利药品定价及报销决策的相关性]
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2006 Dec;156(23-24):612-8. doi: 10.1007/s10354-006-0357-7.
10
QALYs, standard gambles, and the expected budget constraint.质量调整生命年、标准博弈与预期预算约束。
J Health Econ. 2002 Mar;21(2):181-95. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(01)00116-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the reliability of a novel cancer-specific multi-attribute utility instrument (FACT-8D) and comparing its validity to EQ-5D-5L in colorectal cancer patients.评估一种新型癌症专用多属性效用量表(FACT-8D)的可靠性,并比较其在结直肠癌患者中的有效性与 EQ-5D-5L。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Dec;33(12):3309-3322. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03774-1. Epub 2024 Sep 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Using QALYs in cancer: a review of the methodological limitations.使用 QALYs 评估癌症:方法学局限性的综述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2011 Aug;29(8):673-85. doi: 10.2165/11588250-000000000-00000.
2
Current application of National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidance in the management of patients with severe psoriasis: a clinical audit against NICE guidance in seven National Health Service specialist dermatology units in England.当前在管理严重银屑病患者方面应用国民保健署卫生技术评估机构(NICE)指南的情况:在英格兰七个国家卫生服务机构专科皮肤科单位中针对 NICE 指南进行的临床审核。
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2011 Aug;36(6):602-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2010.04011.x. Epub 2011 Mar 11.
3
[On the necessity of benefit assessments across all indications].
[关于所有适应症进行获益评估的必要性]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2010;104(3):209-14. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2010.03.004.
4
QALYs: the basics.质量调整生命年:基础内容
Value Health. 2009 Mar;12 Suppl 1:S5-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00515.x.
5
QALYs: some challenges.质量调整生命年:一些挑战。
Value Health. 2009 Mar;12 Suppl 1:S10-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00516.x.
6
[Measuring quality of life: generic or specific questionnaires?].[测量生活质量:通用问卷还是特定问卷?]
Arch Bronconeumol. 2005 Mar;41(3):107-9. doi: 10.1016/s1579-2129(06)60409-6.
7
Problems and solutions in calculating quality-adjusted life years (QALYs).质量调整生命年(QALYs)计算中的问题与解决方案。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 Dec 19;1:80. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-80.
8
QALYs: the best option so far.质量调整生命年:迄今为止的最佳选择。
CMAJ. 2003 May 27;168(11):1394-6; author reply 1396.