• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以色列和北美白人群体的拱形状比较。

Comparison of arch forms between Israeli and North American white populations.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Mar;139(3):339-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.03.047.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.03.047
PMID:21392688
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Identification of the dental arch form of the orthodontic patient is a key aspect for achieving a stable, functional, and esthetic dentition. Failure to customize preformed archwires with the patient's arch form might increase the probability of relapse and lead to an unnatural smile. The primary objective of this study was to identify the arch forms of Israeli subjects with dental normocclusion and malocclusions. The secondary objective was to clarify the morphologic differences between Israeli and North American white subjects with various malocclusions.

METHODS

The sample included 134 Israeli (40 Class I, 61 Class II, and 33 Class III) and 160 North American (60 Class I, 50 Class II, and 50 Class III) subjects. The most facial portion of 13 proximal contact areas was digitized from photocopied images of the mandibular dental arches. Clinical bracket points were calculated for each tooth based on mandibular tooth thickness data. Four linear and 2 proportional measurements were made. The dental arches were classified as square, ovoid, and tapered forms to determine and compare the frequency distributions between the 2 ethnic groups.

RESULTS

The most frequent mandibular arch form of the Israeli group was found to be ovoid as opposed to tapered in the North American white group. The white population had statistically significant decreased arch widths and increased arch depths compared with the Israeli population. The analysis of the Israeli sample indicated that, as the malocclusion shifts from Class III through Class I to Class II, the weight of the arch form tends to shift from square and ovoid to ovoid and tapered.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that, when treating Israeli patients, one should expect to use the preformed ovoid arch form orthodontic wires in a significant percentage of patients.

摘要

简介

确定正畸患者的牙弓形态是实现稳定、功能和美观牙齿的关键方面。如果未能根据患者的牙弓形态定制预成型的弓丝,可能会增加复发的可能性,并导致不自然的笑容。本研究的主要目的是确定具有正常牙合和错牙合的以色列受试者的牙弓形态。次要目的是阐明具有不同错牙合的以色列和北美白种人之间的形态差异。

方法

该样本包括 134 名以色列(40 名 I 类,61 名 II 类,33 名 III 类)和 160 名北美(60 名 I 类,50 名 II 类,50 名 III 类)受试者。从下颌牙弓的影印图像中数字化了 13 个近接触区的最面部部分。根据下颌牙齿厚度数据,为每个牙齿计算临床支架点。进行了 4 个线性和 2 个比例测量。将牙弓分类为方形、卵圆形和锥形,以确定和比较这两个种族群体的频率分布。

结果

与北美白种人相比,以色列组最常见的下颌牙弓形态为卵圆形,而不是锥形。与以色列人相比,白人的牙弓宽度明显减小,牙弓深度增加。对以色列样本的分析表明,随着错牙合从 III 类通过 I 类到 II 类的转变,牙弓形态的权重倾向于从方形和卵圆形转变为卵圆形和锥形。

结论

我们的结果表明,在治疗以色列患者时,预计在很大比例的患者中使用预成型的卵圆形弓丝正畸线。

相似文献

1
Comparison of arch forms between Israeli and North American white populations.以色列和北美白人群体的拱形状比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Mar;139(3):339-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.03.047.
2
Comparison of arch forms between Egyptian and North American white populations.埃及人和北美白人群体的拱形态比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Mar;139(3):e245-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.11.012.
3
Comparison of arch forms between Korean and North American white populations.韩国人和北美白人种群之间牙弓形态的比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Dec;126(6):680-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.10.038.
4
Comparison of arch forms between Turkish and North American.土耳其人与北美人群牙弓形态的比较。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2016 Mar-Apr;21(2):51-8. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.21.2.051-058.oar.
5
A comparative study of Caucasian and Japanese mandibular clinical arch forms.白种人与日本人下颌临床牙弓形态的比较研究。
Angle Orthod. 2001 Jun;71(3):195-200. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2001)071<0195:ACSOCA>2.0.CO;2.
6
Dental archforms in dentoalveolar Class I, II and III.牙弓形态在安氏 I 类、II 类和 III 类错颌中的表现。
Angle Orthod. 2010 Sep;80(5):919-24. doi: 10.2319/112609-672.1.
7
Tooth size discrepancies and arch parameters among different malocclusions in a Jordanian sample.约旦样本中不同错牙合畸形之间的牙齿大小差异和牙弓参数。
Angle Orthod. 2006 May;76(3):459-65. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0459:TSDAAP]2.0.CO;2.
8
Discriminant factor analysis of dental arch dimensions with 3-dimensional virtual models.基于三维虚拟模型的牙弓尺寸判别因子分析。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Nov;140(5):680-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.12.022.
9
Comparison of the dental arch changes in patients with different malocclusions.不同错牙合畸形患者牙弓变化的比较。
Indian J Dent Res. 2014 Sep-Oct;25(5):623-9. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.147109.
10
Effects of levelling of the curve of Spee on the proclination of mandibular incisors and expansion of dental arches: a prospective clinical trial.斯皮曲线整平对下颌切牙前倾及牙弓扩展的影响:一项前瞻性临床试验
Aust Orthod J. 2010 May;26(1):61-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of arch form among the Nepalese population: A morphological study.尼泊尔人群牙弓形态的比较评估:一项形态学研究。
J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2024 Jan-Mar;28(1):111-118. doi: 10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_280_23. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
2
[Facial biotype in relation to the shape of the upper dental arch of individuals from the city of corrientes. a cross-sectional study].[科连特斯市个体面部生物型与上颌牙弓形态的关系。一项横断面研究]
Rev Cient Odontol (Lima). 2023 Jun 29;11(2):e151. doi: 10.21142/2523-2754-1102-2023-151. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.
3
Dental arch form in a sample of Iraqi adults with sickle cell anemia using 3D scanning technique: A cross-sectional study.
使用3D扫描技术对伊拉克镰状细胞贫血成年患者样本的牙弓形态:一项横断面研究。
J Orthod Sci. 2023 Nov 2;12:79. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_20_23. eCollection 2023.
4
Characteristics of Mandibular Arch Forms in Patients with Skeletal Mandibular Prognathism.骨性下颌前突患者下颌弓形态特征
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Oct 17;13(20):3237. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13203237.
5
Mandibular Clinical Arch Forms in Iraqi Population: A National Survey.伊拉克人群下颌临床牙弓形态:一项全国性调查。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Sep 28;12(10):2352. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12102352.
6
The dental arch dimensions in Vietnamese children at 7 years of age, and their variation by gender and ethnicity.7岁越南儿童的牙弓尺寸及其性别和种族差异。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2019 Jul-Sep;9(3):236-240. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2019.06.004. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
7
Comparison of arch forms between Turkish and North American.土耳其人与北美人群牙弓形态的比较。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2016 Mar-Apr;21(2):51-8. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.21.2.051-058.oar.
8
Is arch form influenced by sagittal molar relationship or Bolton tooth-size discrepancy?牙弓形态受矢状位磨牙关系或Bolton牙量不调的影响吗?
BMC Oral Health. 2015 Jun 26;15:70. doi: 10.1186/s12903-015-0062-2.
9
Comparison of mandibular arch forms of Korean and Vietnamese patients by using facial axis points on three-dimensional models.通过三维模型上的面部轴点比较韩国和越南患者的下颌弓形态。
Korean J Orthod. 2013 Dec;43(6):288-93. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2013.43.6.288. Epub 2013 Dec 9.