• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PC-SAD5 的制定与初步验证:一种源自筛查的简短抑郁严重程度度量。

Development and preliminary validation of the PC-SAD5, a screener-derived short depression severity measure.

机构信息

Mental Health Unit, Centre of Epidemiology, Surveillance and Health Promotion, Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012 Feb;26(2):165-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04022.x. Epub 2011 Mar 14.

DOI:10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04022.x
PMID:21395694
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of depressive disorders is high among patients with skin disease. The PC-SAD is a 37-item self-administered depression screening questionnaire that has been validated in dermatological patients.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to develop and validate a brief depression severity instrument derived from the PC-SAD that can be used to assess severity and monitor ongoing clinical course.

METHODS

Two patient samples participated in the study: 72 adult dermatological inpatients and 73 adults attending six primary care practices. Psychiatric assessment included the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV and an 18-item version of the PC-SAD; moreover, dermatological patients completed the Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale (PHQ-9), while primary care patients were administered the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). A subset of five PC-SAD items showing the best psychometric properties were selected, and the reliability and validity of the resulting instrument (PC-SAD5) were examined.

RESULTS

The PC-SAD5 showed satisfactory internal consistency in both samples. There was a high correlation between PC-SAD5 and PHQ-9 and MADRS scores. Multiple regression analysis revealed a gradient of PC-SAD5 scores from patients with no mental disorder, those with milder forms of depression, to those with Major Depressive Disorder. Similar results were observed for the 18-item version of the PC-SAD.

CONCLUSION

The availability of valid and reliable continuous measures of depression severity derived from the PC-SAD extends its field of application from depression screening to use as a follow-up measure of depression severity in routine clinical practice. A validated very short instrument such as the PC-SAD5 may have substantial clinical value.

摘要

背景

皮肤病患者中抑郁障碍的患病率很高。PC-SAD 是一种 37 项自评抑郁筛查问卷,已在皮肤科患者中得到验证。

目的

本研究旨在开发和验证一种源自 PC-SAD 的简短抑郁严重程度工具,用于评估严重程度和监测正在进行的临床过程。

方法

两个患者样本参与了这项研究:72 名成年皮肤科住院患者和 73 名在 6 个初级保健机构就诊的成年人。精神病学评估包括 DSM-IV 结构化临床访谈和 18 项 PC-SAD 版本;此外,皮肤科患者完成了患者健康问卷抑郁量表(PHQ-9),而初级保健患者则接受了蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)。选择了五个具有最佳心理测量特性的 PC-SAD 项目,检验了由此产生的工具(PC-SAD5)的可靠性和有效性。

结果

PC-SAD5 在两个样本中均显示出令人满意的内部一致性。PC-SAD5 与 PHQ-9 和 MADRS 评分高度相关。多元回归分析显示,PC-SAD5 评分存在从无精神障碍患者、轻度抑郁患者到重度抑郁症患者的梯度。PC-SAD 的 18 项版本也观察到了类似的结果。

结论

源自 PC-SAD 的有效且可靠的抑郁严重程度连续测量工具的可用性扩展了其从抑郁筛查到常规临床实践中作为抑郁严重程度随访测量的应用范围。一种经过验证的非常简短的工具,如 PC-SAD5,可能具有重要的临床价值。

相似文献

1
Development and preliminary validation of the PC-SAD5, a screener-derived short depression severity measure.PC-SAD5 的制定与初步验证:一种源自筛查的简短抑郁严重程度度量。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012 Feb;26(2):165-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04022.x. Epub 2011 Mar 14.
2
Screening for depressive disorders in patients with skin diseases: a comparison of three screeners.皮肤病患者抑郁障碍的筛查:三种筛查工具的比较
Acta Derm Venereol. 2005;85(5):414-9. doi: 10.1080/00015550510034966.
3
The accuracy of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 in detecting depression and measuring depression severity in high-risk groups in primary care.患者健康问卷-9在基层医疗中高危人群抑郁检测及抑郁严重程度测量方面的准确性。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2009 Sep-Oct;31(5):451-9. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.06.001. Epub 2009 Jul 10.
4
The Patient Health Questionnaire-2: validity of a two-item depression screener.患者健康问卷-2:一项两项抑郁症筛查工具的效度
Med Care. 2003 Nov;41(11):1284-92. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000093487.78664.3C.
5
Web-based assessment of depression in patients treated in clinical practice: reliability, validity, and patient acceptance.基于网络的临床实践中治疗患者的抑郁评估:信度、效度和患者接受度。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Mar;73(3):333-8. doi: 10.4088/JCP.10m06519. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
6
[Evaluation of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder: validation of a measure, the PCLS].[创伤后应激障碍的评估:一种测量工具——创伤后应激障碍检查表(PCLS)的效度验证]
Encephale. 2003 May-Jun;29(3 Pt 1):232-8.
7
Evaluation of depressive symptoms in patients with coronary artery disease using the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale.采用蒙哥马利-Åsberg 抑郁评定量表评估冠心病患者的抑郁症状。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012 Sep;27(5):249-55. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e328357670d.
8
[Validation of the Short Cognitive Battery (B2C). Value in screening for Alzheimer's disease and depressive disorders in psychiatric practice].[简短认知功能测试组合(B2C)的验证。在精神科实践中筛查阿尔茨海默病和抑郁症的价值]
Encephale. 2003 May-Jun;29(3 Pt 1):266-72.
9
Diagnostic accuracy, internal consistency, and convergent validity of the Greek version of the patient health questionnaire 9 in diagnosing depression in rheumatologic disorders.希腊版患者健康问卷 9 在诊断风湿性疾病中抑郁症的诊断准确性、内部一致性和趋同效度。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Sep;63(9):1313-21. doi: 10.1002/acr.20505.
10
Standardized clinical outcome rating scale for depression for use in clinical practice.用于临床实践的标准化抑郁临床结局评定量表。
Depress Anxiety. 2005;22(1):36-40. doi: 10.1002/da.20046.

引用本文的文献

1
The Relationship Between Satisfaction With Life and Depression Symptoms by Gender.按性别划分的生活满意度与抑郁症状之间的关系。
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Jun 14;10:419. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00419. eCollection 2019.
2
Diagnostic Accuracy of the Primary Care Screener for Affective Disorder (PC-SAD) in Primary Care.
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2013 Oct 4;9:164-70. doi: 10.2174/1745017901309010164. eCollection 2013.