Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle 98145, USA.
Acad Pediatr. 2011 Sep-Oct;11(5):422-6. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2011.01.004. Epub 2011 Mar 11.
To improve our understanding of the clinical needs among youth with suicidal ideation (SI), we examined health care utilization patterns, functional impairment, and comorbidity among youth who endorsed SI, compared with a control group of youth without SI.
This study included 99 youth with SI in the past year and 99 matched controls. Participants were 13- to 17-year-old youth who were enrolled in a large integrated care delivery system who had seen a provider at least one time in the past year. The 2 groups were compared with regard to health care utilization, functional impairment, and comorbid mental health symptoms, while adjusting for depression severity, lifetime diagnosis of depression or anxiety, and medical comorbidity.
Youth with SI had a significantly higher mean functional impairment compared with youth without SI, both at baseline (84% vs 60% "definitely impaired") and 6-month follow-up (57% vs 39% "definitely impaired"). Less than 15% in either group attended a mental health specialty visit in the 12 months before or after baseline, and under 10% received antidepressant or anxiolytic medication. Family-report data suggested that a higher proportion of youth with SI received mental health care from sources outside their health care system compared with youth without SI.
The presence of SI is associated with more severe functional impairment, comorbidity, and depression severity. Yet, only a minority of adolescents with SI receive mental health services, and clinical detection is low. This study suggests that better screening, recognition, and treatment of SI is needed to address the clinical impairment of youth with SI.
为了更好地了解有自杀意念(SI)的年轻人的临床需求,我们研究了与无 SI 的对照组相比,有 SI 的年轻人的医疗保健利用模式、功能障碍和共病情况。
本研究包括过去一年中有 SI 的 99 名青年和 99 名匹配的对照组。参与者为 13-17 岁的青少年,他们参加了一个大型综合医疗服务系统,在过去一年中至少见过一次提供者。在调整了抑郁严重程度、一生中抑郁或焦虑的诊断以及合并的躯体疾病后,比较了两组的医疗保健利用、功能障碍和共患精神健康症状。
与无 SI 的青年相比,有 SI 的青年在基线时(84% vs. 60%“绝对受损”)和 6 个月随访时(57% vs. 39%“绝对受损”)的平均功能障碍明显更严重。两组中不到 15%的人在基线前或后 12 个月内接受过心理健康专科就诊,不到 10%的人接受过抗抑郁药或抗焦虑药治疗。家庭报告数据表明,与无 SI 的青年相比,有 SI 的青年更有可能从医疗系统以外的来源获得心理健康护理。
SI 的存在与更严重的功能障碍、共病和抑郁严重程度相关。然而,只有少数有 SI 的青少年接受心理健康服务,临床检测率较低。这项研究表明,需要更好的筛查、识别和治疗 SI,以解决有 SI 的年轻人的临床障碍。