Suppr超能文献

植入式心脏复律除颤器能否提高冠状动脉搭桥术后严重左心室收缩功能不全患者的生存率?

Do implantable cardioverter defibrillators improve survival in patients with severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction after coronary artery bypass graft surgery?

作者信息

Fazal Iftikhar A, Bates Matthew G D, Matthews Iain G, Turley Andrew J

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Freeman Hospital, High Heaton, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK.

出版信息

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011 Jun;12(6):1010-6. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.259465. Epub 2011 Mar 11.

Abstract

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) improve survival in patients with severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. ICDs are designed to terminate potentially fatal cardiac tachyarrhythmias. A right ventricular lead is mandatory for detection, pacing and defibrillation capabilities. Dual chamber ICDs have an additional right atrial lead and are used for patients with conventional atrioventricular pacing indications. More sophisticated, biventricular devices exist to provide cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) in addition to defibrillation (CRT-D). ICDs have been extensively investigated in patients with LVSD post myocardial infarction and in patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy for both secondary prevention (history of ventricular arrhythmias) and primary prevention (deemed high risk for ventricular arrhythmias). This best evidence topic aims to review the evidence and its applicability to patients post CABG. Nine hundred and sixteen papers were identified using the search method outlined. Eight randomised controlled trials, two meta-analyses, and one non-randomised trial, in addition to international guidelines presented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The current evidence base and guidelines suggest that ICDs should be considered for all patients with LVSD [ejection fraction (EF) ≤30-40%] receiving optimal pharmacological management, who are ≥40 days post MI [four weeks for National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE)] and in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I-III. UK NICE guidelines require in addition; non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) on a Holter monitor and inducible ventricular tachycardia at electrophysiological study for EF between 30 and 35%; or a QRS >120 ms if EF <30%. The North American guidelines recommend EF <30% as a threshold for those with NYHA class I symptoms. The evidence is applicable to patients post CABG, provided all the other criteria are met. European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines recommend waiting at least three months (consensus opinion) after revascularisation prior to assessment for an ICD, to allow time for potential recovery of ventricular function.

摘要

一篇心脏外科领域的最佳证据主题文章是按照结构化方案撰写的。所探讨的问题是,植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)能否提高冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)后严重左心室收缩功能障碍(LVSD)患者的生存率。ICD旨在终止潜在致命的心脏快速性心律失常。右心室导线对于检测、起搏和除颤功能至关重要。双腔ICD还有一根额外的右心房导线,用于有传统房室起搏指征的患者。更先进的双心室装置除了具备除颤功能外,还能提供心脏再同步治疗(CRT)(CRT-D)。ICD已在心肌梗死后LVSD患者以及非缺血性心肌病患者中进行了广泛研究,用于二级预防(有室性心律失常病史)和一级预防(被认为有室性心律失常高风险)。本最佳证据主题旨在回顾相关证据及其对CABG术后患者的适用性。使用所述检索方法共识别出916篇论文。八项随机对照试验、两项荟萃分析和一项非随机试验,以及国际指南提供了回答该临床问题的最佳证据。当前的证据基础和指南表明,对于所有接受最佳药物治疗、心肌梗死后≥40天[英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)为四周]且纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能分级为I - III级、左心室射血分数(EF)≤30 - 40%的LVSD患者,均应考虑植入ICD。英国NICE指南还要求,对于EF在30%至35%之间的患者,动态心电图监测发现非持续性室性心动过速(NSVT)且电生理检查可诱发室性心动过速;或者对于EF <30%的患者,QRS时限>120毫秒。北美指南建议,对于NYHA I级症状患者,以EF <30%作为阈值。如果满足所有其他标准,该证据适用于CABG术后患者。欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)指南建议,在血运重建后至少等待三个月(共识意见)再评估是否植入ICD,以便有时间让心室功能可能恢复。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验