Spadone D P, Barkmeier L D, Hodgson K J, Ramsey D E, Sumner D S
Section of Peripheral Vascular Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield 62794-9230.
J Vasc Surg. 1990 May;11(5):642-9. doi: 10.1067/mva.1990.18703.
The records of 183 patients who had undergone color-flow imaging of the extracranial carotid arteries and subsequent bilateral cerebral arteriography were reviewed to determine whether contralateral carotid arterial disease adversely affects the accuracy of duplex scanning by increasing the velocity of flow in the ipsilateral artery. In 83 arteries the contralateral internal carotid artery had a diameter reduction greater than or equal to 80%; in the remaining 283, the contralateral artery was less severely diseased. Noninvasive findings correlated less well with arteriography in the group with contralateral disease (k = 0.69 +/- 0.06) than in the group with less severe contralateral stenosis (k = 0.78 +/- 0.03), and the incidence of false-positive errors was significantly (p = 0.02) higher (18% vs 7%). For all categories of ipsilateral stenosis, the mean peak systolic and end-diastolic velocities were elevated in the group with severe contralateral disease. This effect was most evident in the 50% to 79% diameter reduction category, especially in reference to the end-diastolic velocity (p = 0.2). However, the data correlating velocity with diameter reduction were widely scattered, indicating that the effect of contralateral disease is inconsistent. We conclude that severe disease of the contralateral carotid artery can lead to overreading ipsilateral disease and that velocity determinations should be interpreted cautiously under such circumstances.
回顾了183例接受颅外颈动脉彩色血流成像及随后双侧脑动脉造影的患者记录,以确定对侧颈动脉疾病是否会通过增加同侧动脉血流速度而对双功扫描的准确性产生不利影响。在83条动脉中,对侧颈内动脉直径减少大于或等于80%;在其余283条动脉中,对侧动脉病变较轻。与对侧病变较轻的组(κ=0.78±0.03)相比,对侧有病变的组中,无创检查结果与动脉造影的相关性较差(κ=0.69±0.06),假阳性错误的发生率显著更高(p=0.02)(18%对7%)。对于同侧狭窄的所有类别,对侧严重病变组的平均收缩期峰值和舒张末期速度均升高。这种影响在直径减少50%至79%的类别中最为明显,尤其是在舒张末期速度方面(p=0.2)。然而,将速度与直径减少相关的数据分布广泛,表明对侧疾病的影响并不一致。我们得出结论,对侧颈动脉严重疾病可导致同侧疾病的过度解读,在这种情况下,应谨慎解释速度测定结果。