Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore MD, USA.
Am J Surg Pathol. 2011 Apr;35(4):553-62. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3182113402.
Several classification schemes for penile precancerous lesions have been proposed, but none of them seems to correlate with the current understanding of penile cancer pathogenesis. Recently, a system, which takes into account morphologic features and purported etiopathogenesis, was proposed, separating penile intraepithelial neoplasia (PeIN) in differentiated and warty/basaloid subtypes. This study was designed to seek an immunohistochemical profile that can be helpful in the classification and differential diagnosis of penile epithelial abnormalities and precancerous lesions using the aforementioned system. The immunohistochemical panel included stains for p16, p53, and Ki-67. For p16 immunostaining, only full-thickness positivity in all epithelial cells was considered as positive; for p53 and Ki-67 immunostaining, patchy or diffuse nuclear positivity above the basal layer was considered as positive. Seventy-four lesions in 59 patients were selected and classified as follows: differentiated PeIN, 34 cases; squamous hyperplasia (SH), 21 cases; basaloid PeIN, 15 cases; and warty PeIN, 4 cases. The mean age of patients was 64 years. Forty-two lesions (56.8%) were located in the glans and 32 (43.2%) in the foreskin. Overexpression of p16 was useful for distinguishing SH from warty/basaloid PeINs (0% vs. 94.7%, P<0.0001) but not SH from differentiated PeINs (0% vs. 5.9%, P=0.519). In addition, p16 allowed the distinction of differentiated and warty/basaloid PeINs (5.9% vs. 94.7%, P<0.0001). Immunohistochemistry results for p53 allowed the separation of SH and differentiated PeIN (9.5% vs. 44.1%, P=0.0078) and SH and warty/basaloid PeIN (9.5% vs. 55.6%, P=0.0042). Ki-67 immunostain was useful for distinguishing SH from differentiated PeIN (52.6% vs. 89.7%, P=0.0062) and SH from PeIN with warty and/or basaloid features (52.6% vs. 100%, P=0.0011). There seems to be a distinctive immunohistochemical profile for associated and precursor epithelial lesions of the penis. SH was p16 and p53 negative, with variable Ki-67 positivity. Differentiated PeIN was p16 negative and Ki-67 positive, with variable p53 positivity. Basaloid and warty PeINs were consistently p16 and Ki-67 positive, with variable p53 positivity. The use of a triple p16/p53/Ki-67 immunohistochemical panel was found to be helpful in the classification, differential diagnosis, and morphologic standardization of penile intraepithelial lesions.
几种阴茎癌前病变的分类方案已经提出,但没有一种似乎与目前对阴茎癌发病机制的理解相关。最近,提出了一种系统,该系统考虑了形态特征和假定的病因发病机制,将阴茎上皮内瘤变(PeIN)分为分化型和疣状/基底样亚型。本研究旨在寻找一种免疫组织化学特征,该特征可有助于使用上述系统对阴茎上皮异常和癌前病变进行分类和鉴别诊断。免疫组织化学小组包括 p16、p53 和 Ki-67 的染色。对于 p16 免疫染色,仅认为所有上皮细胞的全层阳性为阳性;对于 p53 和 Ki-67 免疫染色,认为基底细胞层以上的点状或弥漫性核阳性为阳性。选择了 59 名患者的 74 个病变,并进行了如下分类:分化型 PeIN34 例;鳞状上皮增生(SH)21 例;基底样 PeIN15 例;疣状 PeIN4 例。患者的平均年龄为 64 岁。42 个病变(56.8%)位于龟头,32 个病变(43.2%)位于包皮。p16 的过度表达可用于区分 SH 与疣状/基底样 PeIN(0%与 94.7%,P<0.0001),但不能区分 SH 与分化型 PeIN(0%与 5.9%,P=0.519)。此外,p16 还可以区分分化型和疣状/基底样 PeIN(5.9%与 94.7%,P<0.0001)。p53 的免疫组织化学结果可将 SH 和分化型 PeIN 区分开(9.5%与 44.1%,P=0.0078),SH 和疣状/基底样 PeIN 也可区分开(9.5%与 55.6%,P=0.0042)。Ki-67 免疫染色可用于区分 SH 与分化型 PeIN(52.6%与 89.7%,P=0.0062)和 SH 与具有疣状和/或基底样特征的 PeIN(52.6%与 100%,P=0.0011)。阴茎相关和前体上皮病变似乎具有独特的免疫组织化学特征。SH 为 p16 和 p53 阴性,Ki-67 阳性程度不定。分化型 PeIN 为 p16 阴性,Ki-67 阳性,p53 阳性程度不定。基底样和疣状 PeIN 始终为 p16 和 Ki-67 阳性,p53 阳性程度不定。使用 p16/p53/Ki-67 三重免疫组织化学小组发现有助于对阴茎上皮内病变进行分类、鉴别诊断和形态标准化。