• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康动态:优先排序中效率和公平的影响。

Health dynamics: implications for efficiency and equity in priority setting.

机构信息

Healthcare Management Group, Imperial College Business School, London, UK.

出版信息

Value Health. 2011 Mar-Apr;14(2):387-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.09.003.

DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2010.09.003
PMID:21402306
Abstract

Health dynamics are intertemporal fluctuations in health status of an individual or a group of individuals. It has been found in empirical studies of health inequalities that health dynamics can differ systematically across subgroups, even if prevalence measured at one point in time is the same. We explore the relevance of the concept of health dynamics in the context of cost-effectiveness analysis. Although economic evaluation takes health dynamics into account where they matter in terms of efficiency, we find that it fails to take into account the equity dimensions of health dynamics. In addition, the political implications of health dynamics may influence resource allocation decisions, possibly in opposing directions.

摘要

健康动态是个体或群体健康状况的时期间波动。在健康不平等的实证研究中发现,即使在同一时间点测量的患病率相同,健康动态也可能在亚组之间存在系统差异。我们探讨了健康动态概念在成本效益分析中的相关性。尽管经济评估在效率方面考虑了健康动态的重要性,但我们发现它没有考虑健康动态的公平维度。此外,健康动态的政治影响可能会影响资源分配决策,其方向可能相反。

相似文献

1
Health dynamics: implications for efficiency and equity in priority setting.健康动态:优先排序中效率和公平的影响。
Value Health. 2011 Mar-Apr;14(2):387-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.09.003.
2
Aversion to health inequalities in healthcare prioritisation: a multicriteria optimisation perspective.医疗保健优先排序中对健康不平等现象的厌恶:多标准优化视角
J Health Econ. 2014 Jul;36:164-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2014.04.005. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
3
[Money or life?].
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2003 Feb 6;123(3):302.
4
[How much does the society want to pay?].社会愿意支付多少?
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2003 Feb 6;123(3):303.
5
[Health economics play more and more important role in health care prioritization. Better utilization of the meager health care resources is the goal].卫生经济学在卫生保健资源分配中发挥着越来越重要的作用。更好地利用稀缺的卫生保健资源是目标。
Lakartidningen. 2006;103(46):3617-20, 3622-3.
6
[Maximally reduced suffering or care based on needs?].[最大程度减轻痛苦还是按需护理?]
Lakartidningen. 2008;105(19):1412-3; discussion 1413-4.
7
[Fewer check ups and re-appointments when Vasterbotten redistributes 114 millions].
Lakartidningen. 2008;105(48-49):3510.
8
Health system and equity perspectives in health technology assessment.卫生技术评估中的卫生系统与公平视角
J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 Jun;91 Suppl 2:S74-87.
9
[Age-dependent prioritisation of health-care spending--perspectives for the German health-care system].[医疗保健支出的年龄依赖性优先排序——德国医疗保健系统的视角]
Gesundheitswesen. 2007 Jan;69(1):11-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-960490.
10
A clinician's guide to cost-effectiveness analysis.临床医生成本效益分析指南。
Ann Intern Med. 1990 Jul 15;113(2):147-54. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-113-2-147.