• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

75 岁以上因窦房结功能障碍接受起搏器治疗的患者的预后。

Outcome of patients aged over 75 years who received a pacemaker to treat sinus node dysfunction.

机构信息

Department of cardiology, centre hospitalier de Haguenau, 64, avenue du Pr Leriche, 67504 Haguenau cedex, France.

出版信息

Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2011 Feb;104(2):89-96. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2010.11.006. Epub 2011 Jan 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.acvd.2010.11.006
PMID:21402343
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The prognosis for patients aged over 75 years who receive a pacemaker in the context of sinus node dysfunction is unclear.

AIMS

We sought to evaluate the incidences of atrial fibrillation, heart failure and death in such patients, and the role of the pacing mode in their prognosis.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 102 patients aged over 75 years (mean 82.2 ± 4.4 years) who received a pacemaker in the context of sinus node dysfunction.

RESULTS

During the follow-up period (mean 806 days), 36 patients (35.3%) experienced heart failure, 47 patients (46.1%) had an episode of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, 19 patients (18.6%) progressed to chronic atrial fibrillation and 29 (28.4%) died, the fatal event being sudden death or of cardiac origin in almost half of these patients (44.8%). Patients assigned to dual-chamber minimal ventricular pacing showed significantly lower rates of heart failure episodes (P=0.023) and all-cause mortality (P<0.001) than those assigned to conventional dual-chamber pacing. In contrast, the two groups did not differ with regard to either paroxysmal or chronic atrial fibrillation.

CONCLUSION

In patients aged over 75 years, the use of dual-chamber pacemakers incorporating an algorithm minimizing ventricular pacing for sinus node dysfunction seems to decrease the number of heart failure episodes and mortality. On the basis of this finding, the implantation of such devices seems justifiable, even in this age group.

摘要

背景

对于因窦房结功能障碍而接受起搏器治疗的 75 岁以上患者,其预后尚不清楚。

目的

我们旨在评估此类患者心房颤动、心力衰竭和死亡的发生率,以及起搏模式在其预后中的作用。

方法

这是一项回顾性研究,共纳入 102 名年龄超过 75 岁(平均 82.2±4.4 岁)的因窦房结功能障碍而接受起搏器治疗的患者。

结果

在随访期间(平均 806 天),36 名患者(35.3%)发生心力衰竭,47 名患者(46.1%)出现阵发性心房颤动,19 名患者(18.6%)进展为慢性心房颤动,29 名患者(28.4%)死亡,其中近一半(44.8%)患者的死亡事件为猝死或心源性。与接受传统双腔起搏的患者相比,被分配至双腔最小心室起搏的患者心力衰竭发作(P=0.023)和全因死亡率(P<0.001)显著降低。然而,两组在阵发性或慢性心房颤动方面没有差异。

结论

对于 75 岁以上的患者,使用双腔起搏器并结合最小化心室起搏的算法治疗窦房结功能障碍似乎可以减少心力衰竭发作次数和死亡率。基于这一发现,即使在这个年龄组,植入此类设备似乎也是合理的。

相似文献

1
Outcome of patients aged over 75 years who received a pacemaker to treat sinus node dysfunction.75 岁以上因窦房结功能障碍接受起搏器治疗的患者的预后。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2011 Feb;104(2):89-96. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2010.11.006. Epub 2011 Jan 22.
2
Getting the most out of life.充分享受生活。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008 Nov;19(11):1167-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2008.01239.x.
3
Reduced ejection fraction, sudden cardiac death, and heart failure death in the mode selection trial (MOST): implications for device selection in elderly patients with sinus node disease.模式选择试验(MOST)中的射血分数降低、心源性猝死和心力衰竭死亡:对老年窦房结疾病患者器械选择的启示
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008 Nov;19(11):1160-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2008.01209.x. Epub 2008 May 19.
4
[Pacemaker therapy for the sick sinus node syndrome. Does the atrially involved pacemaker system lower the frequency of atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic complications as well as mortality?].[病窦综合征的起搏器治疗。心房参与的起搏器系统是否能降低心房颤动、血栓栓塞并发症的发生率以及死亡率?]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1994 Dec 9;119(49):1683-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1058887.
5
Cardiac pacing strategies and post-implantation risk of atrial fibrillation and heart failure events in sinus node dysfunction patients: a collaborative analysis of over 6000 patients.窦房结功能障碍患者的心脏起搏策略及植入后房颤和心力衰竭事件的风险:超过6000例患者的协作分析
Clin Res Cardiol. 2016 Aug;105(8):687-698. doi: 10.1007/s00392-016-0973-1. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
6
Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction.在一项针对窦房结功能障碍的起搏器治疗临床试验中,心室起搏对基线QRS时限正常患者的心力衰竭和心房颤动的不良影响。
Circulation. 2003 Jun 17;107(23):2932-7. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000072769.17295.B1. Epub 2003 Jun 2.
7
Does atrial pacing lead to atrial fibrillation in patients with sick sinus syndrome? Insights from the DANPACE trial.房性起搏是否会导致病态窦房结综合征患者发生心房颤动?来自 DANPACE 试验的观察。
Europace. 2014 Feb;16(2):241-5. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut306. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
8
Pacemaker utilization during permanent atrial fibrillation in patients who received pacemaker implantation for sinus node dysfunction.因窦房结功能障碍接受起搏器植入的患者在永久性心房颤动期间起搏器的使用情况。
Am J Cardiol. 2005 Oct 1;96(7):942-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.05.065.
9
Predictors of stroke in patients paced for sick sinus syndrome.病态窦房结综合征起搏患者发生卒中的预测因素
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 May 5;43(9):1617-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.09.067.
10
Single lead atrial vs. dual chamber pacing in sick sinus syndrome: extended register-based follow-up in the DANPACE trial.病态窦房结综合征中单腔心房与双腔起搏的比较:DANPACE 试验的扩展基于注册的随访。
Europace. 2017 Dec 1;19(12):1981-1987. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw364.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding disparities in cardiovascular death rates among older adults with sick sinus syndrome in the US.了解美国患有病态窦房结综合征的老年人心血管死亡率的差异。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Sep 4;86(10):5973-5979. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002522. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Trends in research on sick sinus syndrome: A bibliometric analysis from 2000 to 2022.病态窦房结综合征的研究趋势:2000年至2022年的文献计量分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Nov 9;9:991503. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.991503. eCollection 2022.
3
Evaluation of comprehensive geriatric assessment in older patients undergoing pacemaker implantation.
老年起搏器植入患者综合老年评估的评价。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Aug 12;20(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01685-7.
4
Risk factors and a 3-month risk score for predicting pacemaker implantation in patients with atrial fibrillations.预测心房颤动患者起搏器植入的危险因素及3个月风险评分
Open Heart. 2020 Mar 24;7(1):e001125. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001125. eCollection 2020.
5
2015 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on optimal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming and testing.2015年心脏节律学会/欧洲心律协会/亚太心律协会/拉丁美洲心脏电生理和心脏起搏学会关于植入式心脏复律除颤器最佳程控与测试的专家共识声明
J Arrhythm. 2016 Feb;32(1):1-28. doi: 10.1016/j.joa.2015.12.001. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
6
Pacemaker implantation after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.心房颤动导管消融术后起搏器植入
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2016 Jan;45(1):99-105. doi: 10.1007/s10840-015-0071-8. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
7
Risk factors for bradycardia requiring pacemaker implantation in patients with atrial fibrillation.心房颤动患者发生需要植入起搏器的心动过缓的危险因素。
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Nov 1;110(9):1315-21. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.06.037. Epub 2012 Jul 26.