Karp K B
AANA J. 1990 Apr;58(2):83-8.
Women undergoing ambulatory laparoscopy are known to experience a variety of minor postoperative morbidity which prolongs recovery time and delays discharge. The purpose of this study was to investigate general anesthetic recovery of ambulatory laparoscopy patients receiving two rapid-acting, but disparate, anesthetic techniques. Thirty-one ASA I and II patients between 19 and 44 years of age were randomly divided into two groups. Group I received an isoflurane-based anesthetic, and Group II received an alfentanil continuous infusion. Through analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), Group II recovery scores were found to be significantly higher at T0 (p less than .0001), (p less than .0001), T15 (p less than .001), T30 (p less than .01) and T45 (p less than .02). There was no difference between groups at T60, at which time all patients received the maximum score of 10. No other factor besides anesthetic technique significantly affected recovery scores. Group II patients spent an average of 166 minutes (+/- 59 standard deviation) in the recovery room in comparison with 192 minutes (+/- 32 standard deviation) for Group I patients. Despite this finding, an ANCOVA determined that only presence of postoperative vomiting significantly affected recovery room time (p less than .03). Further research is indicated in the endeavor to reduce postoperative morbidity of this patient population.
已知接受非住院腹腔镜检查的女性会经历各种轻微的术后并发症,这会延长恢复时间并延迟出院。本研究的目的是调查接受两种快速起效但不同麻醉技术的非住院腹腔镜检查患者的全身麻醉恢复情况。31名年龄在19至44岁之间的ASA I级和II级患者被随机分为两组。第一组接受以异氟烷为基础的麻醉,第二组接受阿芬太尼持续输注。通过协方差分析(ANCOVA)发现,第二组在T0(p小于0.0001)、(p小于0.0001)、T15(p小于0.001)、T30(p小于0.01)和T45(p小于0.02)时的恢复评分显著更高。在T60时两组之间没有差异,此时所有患者的最高得分为10分。除麻醉技术外,没有其他因素显著影响恢复评分。第二组患者在恢复室平均停留166分钟(±59标准差),而第一组患者为192分钟(±32标准差)。尽管有这一发现,但ANCOVA确定只有术后呕吐的存在显著影响恢复室时间(p小于0.03)。为减少该患者群体的术后并发症,需要进一步研究。