Froger-Colléaux Christelle, Rompion Sonia, Guillaume Philippe, Porsolt Roger D, Castagné Vincent, Moser Paul
Porsolt, 9bis rue Henri Martin, 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2011 Jul-Aug;64(1):81-8. doi: 10.1016/j.vascn.2011.03.001. Epub 2011 Mar 23.
The procedures used to assess withdrawal must be sensitive and widely applicable, i.e. not specific to any particular drug class. Furthermore, the measurements should not be affected by repeat testing.
We have used implanted telemetry devices to continuously follow body temperature, locomotor activity (LMA), heart rate (HR) and mean arterial blood pressure (mean ABP) in addition to food intake and body weight gain over 20days of treatment and 8days of withdrawal. The effects of morphine (32 and 64mg/kg p.o., b.i.d.) and chlordiazepoxide (16, 32 and 64mg/kg p.o., b.i.d.) were studied in rats.
The results show that during the treatment phase chronic morphine reduced food intake and body weight gain, increased body temperature, HR, mean ABP and LMA. These effects continued over the 20days of treatment. In contrast, chlordiazepoxide slightly increased food intake and body weight gain throughout the treatment period. It also decreased body temperature and LMA but increased HR and mean ABP after the first few administrations but these effects disappeared over the 20days of treatment. Following discontinuation, both morphine- and chlordiazepoxide-treated rats showed a dose-related decrease in food intake and loss of weight on days 2 and 3 of discontinuation. Morphine discontinuation also induced a nocturnal hypothermia and a diurnal hypertension (i.e. during the light phase) which lasted for 4-5days and also moderate diurnal increases in locomotor activity and heart rate over the first 3days of discontinuation. Chlordiazepoxide discontinuation induced small increases in telemetry parameters some of which, such as the effect on locomotor activity, lasted for more than 5days. The intensity and duration of effects for both substances were broadly dose-related.
These data show that telemetry can increase the sensitivity of withdrawal experiments to changes that might otherwise be missed and allows a better definition of the time-course of withdrawal effects. This technique is therefore useful as part of safety pharmacology abuse liability evaluation of novel test substances across a broad range of pharmacological and therapeutic classes.
用于评估戒断反应的程序必须灵敏且具有广泛适用性,即不针对任何特定药物类别。此外,测量结果不应受重复测试的影响。
我们使用植入式遥测设备,在20天的治疗期和8天的戒断期内,持续跟踪体温、运动活动(LMA)、心率(HR)和平均动脉血压(平均ABP),以及食物摄入量和体重增加情况。研究了吗啡(32和64mg/kg口服,每日两次)和氯氮卓(16、32和64mg/kg口服,每日两次)对大鼠的影响。
结果表明,在治疗阶段,慢性吗啡减少了食物摄入量和体重增加,升高了体温、心率、平均动脉血压和运动活动。这些影响在20天的治疗期内持续存在。相比之下,氯氮卓在整个治疗期间略微增加了食物摄入量和体重增加。它还降低了体温和运动活动,但在最初几次给药后增加了心率和平均动脉血压,但这些影响在20天的治疗期内消失。停药后,吗啡和氯氮卓治疗的大鼠在停药第2天和第3天均出现食物摄入量与剂量相关的减少和体重减轻。吗啡停药还诱发了夜间体温过低和日间高血压(即在光照期),持续4 - 5天,并且在停药的前3天运动活动和心率也有适度的日间增加。氯氮卓停药导致遥测参数有小幅度增加,其中一些影响,如对运动活动的影响,持续超过5天。两种物质的影响强度和持续时间大致与剂量相关。
这些数据表明,遥测技术可以提高戒断实验对可能被忽略的变化的敏感性,并能更好地定义戒断效应的时间进程。因此,这项技术作为新型测试物质安全药理学滥用可能性评估的一部分,在广泛的药理学和治疗类别中很有用。