Centro de Ciências Naturais e Humanas, Universidade Federal do ABC, Rua Santa Adelia 166, CEP 09210-170, Santo André, SP, Brazil.
J Phys Condens Matter. 2011 Feb 2;23(4):045001. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/23/4/045001. Epub 2010 Dec 15.
In this work, a 2.0 nm nanoparticle (low limit synthesized system) is compared to possible simplified models: passivated clusters, small (1.3 nm) nanoparticles and sets of plane surfaces. Our density functional theory results suggest that even when geometric aspects are properly described by the simplifications considered, electronic properties might be very different, especially when edge atoms are not properly taken into account in the nanoparticle's modeling. In addition, we propose a protocol that might help future theoretical descriptions of nanoparticles.
在这项工作中,我们将 2.0nm 纳米颗粒(下限合成体系)与可能的简化模型进行了比较:钝化团簇、小(1.3nm)纳米颗粒和平面集。我们的密度泛函理论结果表明,即使简化模型适当描述了几何方面,电子性质也可能非常不同,特别是在纳米颗粒建模中没有适当考虑边缘原子时。此外,我们提出了一个方案,可能有助于未来对纳米颗粒的理论描述。