• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无保护左主干病变经药物洗脱支架置入术后再狭窄患者的发生率、预测因素、治疗及长期预后。

Incidence, predictors, treatment, and long-term prognosis of patients with restenosis after drug-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery disease.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Mar 22;57(12):1349-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.10.041.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2010.10.041
PMID:21414531
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence, predictors, and long-term outcomes of patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) for unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease.

BACKGROUND

Few data on the clinical course and management of patients experiencing restenosis after DES treatment for unprotected LMCA disease have appeared.

METHODS

Between February 2003 and November 2007, 509 consecutive patients with unprotected LMCA disease underwent DES implantation, with 402 (80.1%) undergoing routine surveillance or clinically driven angiographic follow-up. A major adverse cardiac event was defined as the composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), or target-lesion revascularization.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of angiographic ISR in LMCA lesions was 17.6% (71 of 402 patients, 57 with focal-type and 14 with diffuse-type ISR. Forty patients (56.3%) underwent repeated PCI, 10 (14.1%) underwent bypass surgery, and 21 (29.6%) were treated medically. During long-term follow-up (a median of 31.7 months), there were no deaths, 1 (2.2%) MI, and 6 (9.5%) repeated target-lesion revascularization cases. The incidence of major adverse cardiac event was 14.4% in the medical group, 13.6% in the repeated PCI group, and 10.0% in the bypass surgery group (p = 0.91). Multivariate analysis showed that the occurrence of DES-ISR did not affect the risk of death or MI.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of ISR was 17.7% after DES stenting for LMCA. The long-term clinical prognosis of patients with DES-ISR associated with LMCA stenting might be benign, given that these patients were optimally treated with the clinical judgment of the treating physician.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)药物洗脱支架(DES)治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉(LMCA)疾病后发生支架内再狭窄(ISR)的发生率、预测因素和长期预后。

背景

关于 DES 治疗无保护 LMCA 疾病后发生再狭窄患者的临床过程和处理方法的数据很少。

方法

2003 年 2 月至 2007 年 11 月,509 例连续无保护 LMCA 疾病患者接受 DES 植入术,其中 402 例(80.1%)接受常规监测或临床驱动的血管造影随访。主要不良心脏事件定义为死亡、心肌梗死(MI)或靶病变血运重建的复合事件。

结果

LMCA 病变的血管造影 ISR 总体发生率为 17.6%(402 例患者中的 71 例,57 例为局灶型,14 例为弥漫型 ISR。40 例(56.3%)患者接受了再次 PCI,10 例(14.1%)患者接受了旁路手术,21 例(29.6%)患者接受了药物治疗。在长期随访(中位数 31.7 个月)中,无死亡、1 例(2.2%)MI 和 6 例(9.5%)靶病变血运重建病例。药物治疗组、再次 PCI 组和旁路手术组的主要不良心脏事件发生率分别为 14.4%、13.6%和 10.0%(p = 0.91)。多因素分析显示,DES-ISR 的发生并不影响死亡或 MI 的风险。

结论

DES 支架置入治疗 LMCA 后 ISR 的发生率为 17.7%。DES 支架治疗 LMCA 相关 ISR 的患者长期临床预后可能良好,因为这些患者经治疗医生的临床判断得到了最佳治疗。

相似文献

1
Incidence, predictors, treatment, and long-term prognosis of patients with restenosis after drug-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery disease.无保护左主干病变经药物洗脱支架置入术后再狭窄患者的发生率、预测因素、治疗及长期预后。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Mar 22;57(12):1349-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.10.041.
2
Impact of coronary anatomy and stenting technique on long-term outcome after drug-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery disease.药物洗脱支架置入治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病后,冠状动脉解剖结构和支架技术对长期预后的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan;7(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.013. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
3
Clinical and procedural predictors of suboptimal outcome after the treatment of drug-eluting stent restenosis in the unprotected distal left main stem: the Milan and New-Tokyo (MITO) registry.药物洗脱支架再狭窄治疗后未保护的左主干远端的临床和操作预测因素:米兰和新东京(MITO)登记处。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Aug 1;5(4):491-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.964874. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
4
Outlook of drug-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main disease: insights on long-term clinical predictors.药物洗脱支架植入治疗无保护左主干病变的前景:长期临床预测因素的见解
J Invasive Cardiol. 2007 Sep;19(9):381-7.
5
Impact of diabetes mellitus on patients with unprotected left main coronary artery lesion disease treated with either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary-artery bypass grafting.糖尿病对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术的无保护左主干冠状动脉病变患者的影响。
Coron Artery Dis. 2012 Aug;23(5):322-9. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e3283564961.
6
Long-term outcomes after stenting versus coronary artery bypass grafting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: 10-year results of bare-metal stents and 5-year results of drug-eluting stents from the ASAN-MAIN (ASAN Medical Center-Left MAIN Revascularization) Registry.无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病支架置入与冠状动脉旁路移植术的长期结局:ASAN-MAIN(ASAN 医疗中心-左主干血运重建)注册研究中裸金属支架 10 年和药物洗脱支架 5 年的结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Oct 19;56(17):1366-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.097.
7
Results and predictors of angiographic restenosis and long-term adverse cardiac events after drug-eluting stent implantation for aorto-ostial coronary artery disease.药物洗脱支架植入治疗主动脉开口处冠状动脉疾病后血管造影再狭窄及长期不良心脏事件的结果与预测因素
Am J Cardiol. 2007 Mar 15;99(6):760-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.10.028. Epub 2007 Jan 22.
8
Long-term outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main coronary artery disease.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病的长期结果。
Int J Cardiol. 2010 Feb 4;138(3):272-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.08.016. Epub 2008 Sep 19.
9
Long-term clinical outcomes of patients with unprotected left main bifurcation lesions treated with 2-stent techniques.无保护左主干分叉病变患者应用双支架技术的长期临床结果。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2013 Jul;126(13):2409-13.
10
Long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for ostial/mid-shaft lesions versus distal bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery: the DELTA Registry (drug-eluting stent for left main coronary artery disease): a multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗开口/中段病变与无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期临床结局:DELTA 注册研究(左主干冠状动脉疾病药物洗脱支架):一项多中心注册研究,评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干的疗效。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1242-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.005.

引用本文的文献

1
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Treating In-Stent Restenosis in Unprotected-Left Main: LM-DRAGON-Registry.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干支架内再狭窄:LM-DRAGON注册研究
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 29;9:849971. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.849971. eCollection 2022.
2
A prediction model based on platelet parameters, lipid levels, and angiographic characteristics to predict in-stent restenosis in coronary artery disease patients implanted with drug-eluting stents.基于血小板参数、血脂水平和血管造影特征的预测模型,预测冠心病患者药物洗脱支架置入后支架内再狭窄。
Lipids Health Dis. 2021 Sep 29;20(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12944-021-01553-2.
3
Angiographic control versus ischaemia-driven management of patients undergoing percutaneous revascularisation of the unprotected left main coronary artery with second-generation drug-eluting stents: rationale and design of the PULSE trial.
第二代药物洗脱支架治疗非保护左主干冠状动脉经皮血运重建患者的血管造影对照与缺血驱动管理:PULSE试验的原理与设计
Open Heart. 2020 Oct;7(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001253.
4
A comparison between drug-eluting stent implantation and drug-coated balloon angioplasty in patients with left main bifurcation in-stent restenotic lesions.药物洗脱支架植入术与药物涂层球囊血管成形术治疗左主干分叉支架内再狭窄病变的对比研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Feb 18;20(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01381-9.
5
Effects of Rosuvastatin on Apolipoprotein J in Balloon-Injured Carotid Artery in Rats.瑞舒伐他汀对大鼠球囊损伤颈动脉载脂蛋白J的影响
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2018 Oct;111(4):562-568. doi: 10.5935/abc.20180163. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
6
Why coronary artery bypass surgery is still the optimal treatment strategy for left main stem disease: an evidence-based review with a Malaysian surgical perspective.为何冠状动脉搭桥手术仍是左主干疾病的最佳治疗策略:基于马来西亚外科视角的循证综述
Heart Asia. 2011 Jan 1;3(1):126-9. doi: 10.1136/heartasia-2011-010059. eCollection 2011.
7
Coronary artery stenting in a patient with chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura: a clinical conundrum.慢性免疫性血小板减少性紫癜患者的冠状动脉支架置入术:一个临床难题。
BMJ Case Rep. 2012 Sep 24;2012:bcr0220125802. doi: 10.1136/bcr-02-2012-5802.
8
Treatment of patients with left main coronary artery disease.左主干冠状动脉疾病患者的治疗。
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2012 Feb;14(1):108-16. doi: 10.1007/s11936-011-0159-0.