Suppr超能文献

颈椎前路手术后胃食管反流:一项对照、前瞻性分析。

Gastroesophageal reflux after anterior cervical surgery: a controlled, prospective analysis.

机构信息

The Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Nov 15;36(24):2039-44. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31821795f1.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective controlled clinical study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence and severity of GERD in patients undergoing anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF), using patients undergoing posterior lumbar decompression as a control group.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The incidence gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) has not previously been studied.

METHODS

Patients undergoing either 1- or 2-level ACDF (n = 38) or posterior lumbar decompression surgery (control group, n = 56) were prospectively enrolled. Baseline patient characteristics were recorded. Intraoperative and postoperative medical records were reviewed. A validated GERD measurement tool (GERD Impact Scale, GIS) and a dysphagia questionnaire (including a dysphagia numeric rating score, range, 0-10) were administered preoperatively, and during the 2-week, 6-week, and 12-week postoperative visits.

RESULTS

Cervical patients had a significantly higher incidence of GERD at 2 weeks than the lumbar patients (78.9% vs. 42.9%, P = 0.001). Cervical patients had a higher incidence of GERD at 6 and 12 weeks as well, but these differences were not statistically significant. The change in GIS score from baseline was significantly higher in the cervical group at all follow-up time periods. On average, cervical patients required 1.2 doses of antacid medication in the postoperative period, compared to an average of 0.5 doses required by lumbar patients (P = 0.006). There was a significant correlation between the severity of dysphagia and the GIS score at 2 weeks, but no correlation at 6 or 12 weeks. Operative time did not correlate with the GIS score at any of the follow-up time periods. The number of surgical levels (i.e., one vs. two) and level of surgery (i.e., above C5-C6 vs. at or below C5-C6) had no effect on the GIS score.

CONCLUSION

Compared to the lumbar control group, patients in the cervical group had increased incidence, and severity of GERD-like symptoms in the early postoperative period.

摘要

研究设计

前瞻性对照临床试验。

目的

通过与后路腰椎减压术作对照,确定前路颈椎减压融合术(ACDF)患者胃食管反流病(GERD)的发生率和严重程度。

背景资料概要

前路颈椎减压融合术后 GERD 的发生率尚未见研究报道。

方法

前瞻性纳入行单节段或双节段 ACDF(n=38)或后路腰椎减压术(对照组,n=56)的患者。记录基线患者特征。回顾术中及术后病历。术前及术后 2 周、6 周和 12 周时采用经过验证的 GERD 测量工具(胃食管反流病严重程度指数,GIS)和吞咽困难问卷(包括吞咽困难数字评分,范围 0-10)进行评估。

结果

颈椎组患者在术后 2 周时 GERD 的发生率显著高于腰椎组(78.9% vs. 42.9%,P=0.001)。颈椎组在术后 6 周和 12 周时 GERD 的发生率也更高,但这些差异无统计学意义。颈椎组在所有随访时间点的 GIS 评分变化均显著高于腰椎组。颈椎组患者平均在术后需要 1.2 剂抗酸药物,而腰椎组平均需要 0.5 剂(P=0.006)。在术后 2 周时,吞咽困难的严重程度与 GIS 评分之间存在显著相关性,但在术后 6 周和 12 周时无相关性。手术时间与任何随访时间点的 GIS 评分均无相关性。手术节段数(即 1 节 vs. 2 节)和手术部位(即 C5-C6 以上 vs. C5-C6 及以下)对 GIS 评分均无影响。

结论

与后路腰椎减压术对照组相比,颈椎组患者在术后早期 GERD 样症状的发生率和严重程度更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验