Gabriel Boris, Nassif Joseph, Barata Sonia, Wattiez Arnaud
IRCAD-EITS, 1, Place de l' Hopital, Hopitaux Universitaires, 67091 Strasbourg, France.
Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Sep;22(9):1165-9. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1361-z. Epub 2011 Mar 18.
Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) was first described almost 20 years ago. This technique aims to provide the outcomes of the gold standard abdominal approach while offering the benefits of minimally invasive surgery. However, the widespread diffusion of LSC in the management of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is hampered by its presumed length and technical difficulties due to the inherent need for laparoscopic suturing skills.
In this article, we highlight the current status of LSC based on a historical overview and in the paradigm of an interrelationship between the three different approaches to POP correction.
The enormous changes over the past 15 years have contributed to a better understanding of the pathologies and their treatment, which has enabled us to refine LSC, to simplify it, and to make it much more reproducible.
In the future, we will need more prospective studies to compare LSC with vaginal reconstructive surgery.
腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术(LSC)于近20年前首次被描述。该技术旨在提供金标准腹部手术的疗效,同时具备微创手术的优势。然而,LSC在盆腔器官脱垂(POP)管理中的广泛应用受到其假定的手术时长以及因固有需要腹腔镜缝合技能而产生的技术难度的阻碍。
在本文中,我们基于历史概述以及POP矫正三种不同方法之间相互关系的范式,突出LSC的当前状况。
过去15年中的巨大变化有助于更好地理解病理状况及其治疗方法,这使我们能够改进LSC,简化它,并使其更具可重复性。
未来,我们将需要更多前瞻性研究来比较LSC与阴道重建手术。