Dilorio C
Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322.
J Neurosci Nurs. 1990 Jun;22(3):139-46. doi: 10.1097/01376517-199006000-00002.
This study examined trends in neuroscience nursing research from 1960 to 1988. The review was an extension of a study analyzing trends in cardiovascular nursing from 1960 to 1985. Four questions (similar to those developed by Yarcheski regarding elements essential to development of a scientific base) framed the present analysis of neuroscience nursing research studies. The sampling frame for the study consisted of four journals: Nursing Research, 1960-1988; Western Journal of Nursing Research, 1979-1988; Research in Nursing and Health, 1978-1988; Journal of Neurosurgical Nursing, 1969-1985; and Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, 1986-1988. These journals were canvassed for studies meeting specified criteria as neuroscience nursing research studies. A total of 71 studies meeting the stated criteria were included in the final sample and reviewed in a systematic manner to identify such characteristics as variables measured, type of approach to theory development, type of research design, number and type of subjects, data analysis procedures, interpretation and conclusions of the study. Findings of the study indicate there has been a substantial increase in the number of neuroscience studies conducted and reported by nurses and an increase in the number of principal authors with advanced degrees. The orientation of studies has shifted from chronic care or rehabilitation to acute care research. An absence of studies about prevention of head and spinal cord injury was noted. Although a trend toward the theory-then-research approach was detected, the research-then-theory approach has been and continues to be the primary strategy for the development of a body of scientific knowledge. It is possible that clinical nurses are using research more frequently to solve problems. Finally, the scientific methods employed in this group of studies have become more complex and varied over time.
本研究调查了1960年至1988年神经科学护理研究的趋势。该综述是一项分析1960年至1985年心血管护理趋势研究的扩展。四个问题(类似于Yarcheski提出的关于科学基础发展要素的问题)构成了当前对神经科学护理研究的分析框架。该研究的抽样框架包括四种期刊:《护理研究》(1960 - 1988年);《西方护理研究杂志》(1979 - 1988年);《护理与健康研究》(1978 - 1988年);《神经外科护理杂志》(1969 - 1985年);以及《神经科学护理杂志》(1986 - 1988年)。对这些期刊进行筛选,以寻找符合神经科学护理研究特定标准的研究。最终样本中纳入了71项符合既定标准的研究,并以系统的方式进行审查,以确定所测量的变量、理论发展的方法类型、研究设计的类型、受试者的数量和类型、数据分析程序、研究的解释和结论等特征。研究结果表明,护士进行并报告的神经科学研究数量大幅增加,拥有高级学位的主要作者数量也有所增加。研究方向已从慢性病护理或康复转向急性护理研究。注意到缺乏关于预防头部和脊髓损伤的研究。虽然检测到一种从理论到研究的方法趋势,但从研究到理论的方法一直是并将继续是科学知识体系发展的主要策略。临床护士可能更频繁地使用研究来解决问题。最后,随着时间的推移,这组研究中采用的科学方法变得更加复杂和多样。