Broeders Joris A J L, Draaisma Werner A, Rijnhart-de Jong Hilda G, Smout André J P M, van Lanschot Jan J B, Broeders Ivo A M J, Gooszen Hein G
Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Arch Surg. 2011 Mar;146(3):340-6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.32.
To investigate the 5-year effect of surgeon experience with laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF). In 2000, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) was prematurely terminated because LNF for gastroesophageal reflux disease was associated with a higher risk to develop dysphagia than conventional Nissen fundoplication (CNF). Criticism focused on alleged bias caused by the relative lack of experience with the laparoscopic approach of the participating surgeons.
Multicenter RCT and prospective cohort study.
University medical centers and tertiary teaching hospitals.
In the RCT, 74 patients underwent CNF and 93 patients underwent LNF (LNFI). The complete setup of the cohort study (LNFII) (n = 121) mirrored the RCT, except that surgeon experience increased from more than 5 to more than 30 LNFs per surgeon.
Conventional Nissen fundoplication, LNFI, and LNFII.
Intraoperative and in-hospital characteristics, objective reflux control, and clinical outcome.
In LNFII, operating time (110 vs 165 minutes; P < .001), dysphagia (2.5% vs 12.3%; P = .008), dilatations for dysphagia (0.8% vs 7.0%; P = .02), and conversions (3.5% vs 7.7%; P = .19) were reduced compared with LNFI. Moreover, in LNFII, hospitalization (4.2 vs 5.6 days; P = .07 and 4.2 vs 7.6 days; P < .001) and in-hospital complications (5.1% vs 13.5%; P = .046 and 5.1% vs 19.3%; P = .005) were reduced compared with LNFI and CNF, respectively. In LNFII, the 6-month reintervention rate was reduced compared with LNFI (0.8% vs 10.1%; P = .002). Esophagitis and esophageal acid exposure at 3 months and reflux symptoms, proton-pump inhibitor use, and quality of life at 5 years improved similarly.
Operating time, complications, hospitalization, early dysphagia, dilatations for dysphagia, and reintervention rate after LNF improve significantly when surgeon experience increases from more than 5 to more than 30 LNFs. In contrast, short-term objective reflux control and 5-year clinical outcome do not improve with experience. In experienced hands, LNF reduces in-hospital complications and hospitalization compared with CNF, with similar 5-year effectiveness and reoperation rate.
探讨外科医生行腹腔镜尼氏胃底折叠术(LNF)的5年疗效。2000年,一项随机对照试验(RCT)提前终止,因为与传统尼氏胃底折叠术(CNF)相比,腹腔镜下治疗胃食管反流病发生吞咽困难的风险更高。批评主要集中在参与研究的外科医生对腹腔镜手术方法相对缺乏经验所导致的所谓偏差。
多中心RCT和前瞻性队列研究。
大学医学中心和三级教学医院。
在RCT中,74例患者接受了CNF,93例患者接受了LNF(LNFI)。队列研究(LNFII)(n = 121)的完整设置与RCT相似,不同之处在于每位外科医生的LNF经验从超过5例增加到超过30例。
传统尼氏胃底折叠术、LNFI和LNFII。
术中及住院期间的特征、客观反流控制及临床结局。
与LNFI相比,LNFII的手术时间(110分钟对165分钟;P <.001)、吞咽困难发生率(2.5%对12.3%;P =.008)、因吞咽困难进行扩张的比例(0.8%对7.0%;P =.02)及中转开腹率(3.5%对7.7%;P =.19)均有所降低。此外,与LNFI相比,LNFII的住院时间(4.2天对5.6天;P =.07及4.2天对7.6天;P <.001)及住院并发症(5.1%对13.5%;P =.046及5.1%对19.3%;P =.005)分别降低。与LNFI相比,LNFII的6个月再次干预率降低(0.8%对10.1%;P =.002)。3个月时的食管炎和食管酸暴露以及5年时的反流症状、质子泵抑制剂使用情况和生活质量改善情况相似。
当外科医生的LNF经验从超过5例增加到超过30例时,LNF后的手术时间、并发症、住院时间、早期吞咽困难、因吞咽困难进行扩张的比例及再次干预率均显著改善。相比之下短期客观反流控制及5年临床结局并未随经验增加而改善。在经验丰富的医生手中,与CNF相比,LNF可降低住院并发症及住院时间,5年疗效和再次手术率相似。