Department of Clinical Medicine and Prevention, Unit of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
J Hypertens. 2011 May;29(5):1012-8. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32834550d0.
Discontinuation of antihypertensive treatment is known to be different for different classes of antihypertensive drugs. No information is available on whether this phenomenon differs for drugs belonging to the same class. This is clinically relevant because treatment discontinuation is mainly responsible for poor blood pressure control in the antihypertensive population.
We studied a large (n=131,472) cohort of patients aged 40-80 years who lived in Lombardy (Italy) and received their first antihypertensive drug prescription during 2005. Discontinuation was defined by the absence of any antihypertensive drug prescription during the 90-day period following the end of the latest prescription. Class-related and drug-related discontinuation rates were standardized according to the demographic and therapeutic structure of the entire cohort and expressed as number of patients who experienced discontinuation every 100 person-months.
Standardized rates of discontinuation ranged from 6.2 to 24.4 events every 100 person-months for patients who started monotherapy with an angiotensin receptor antagonist and a diuretic, respectively. However, there was a significant heterogeneity between treatment discontinuation rates within each class and the heterogeneity differed between classes. The highest discontinuation rate was 13.9-fold for channel blockers, but only 1.7-fold for angiotensin receptor antagonists. Within this class, losartan showed a discontinuation rate significantly greater than that of the other angiotensin receptor antagonists whose discontinuation rate was similar. A significant heterogeneity also characterized initial treatment with fixed-dose combinations of different angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor antagonists with a diuretic.
Comparison of treatment discontinuation between antihypertensive drug classes masks the fact that this phenomenon is heterogeneous within any given class. This is relevant to calculations of the cost-benefit of treatment, which, thus, should be drug-based rather than class-based.
不同类别的降压药物停药情况不同,这是已知的。但是否同一类药物之间存在这种现象尚不清楚。这在临床上是相关的,因为降压人群中血压控制不佳主要是由于治疗中断。
我们研究了一个来自意大利伦巴第大区的大型队列(n=131472),年龄在 40-80 岁之间,他们在 2005 年接受了首次降压药物处方。停药定义为在最新处方结束后的 90 天内没有任何降压药物处方。根据整个队列的人口统计学和治疗结构,对类别相关和药物相关的停药率进行标准化,并表示每 100 人-月发生停药的患者人数。
开始单药治疗时分别使用血管紧张素受体拮抗剂和利尿剂的患者,标准化停药率分别为每 100 人-月 6.2-24.4 例。然而,在每个类别内治疗停药率之间存在显著的异质性,并且这种异质性在类别之间也不同。通道阻滞剂的停药率最高为 13.9 倍,但血管紧张素受体拮抗剂仅为 1.7 倍。在该类别中,氯沙坦的停药率明显大于其他血管紧张素受体拮抗剂,而其他血管紧张素受体拮抗剂的停药率相似。不同血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素受体拮抗剂与利尿剂的固定剂量组合的初始治疗也具有显著的异质性。
将降压药物类别之间的治疗停药率进行比较掩盖了一个事实,即在任何给定类别内,这种现象存在异质性。这与治疗的成本效益计算有关,因此,应该基于药物而不是类别。