• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用巴尼地平替代氨氯地平和乐卡地平:一项真实生活研究中的耐受性和有效性

Replacement of Amlodipine and Lercanidipine by Barnidipine: Tolerability and Effectiveness in a Real-Life Study.

作者信息

Lins Robert, Haerden Yves, de Vries Caroline

机构信息

University of Antwerpen, Hazelarenstraat 7, Antwerpen, 2020, Belgium.

Astellas Pharma B.V., Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2017 Mar;24(1):29-36. doi: 10.1007/s40292-016-0177-9.

DOI:10.1007/s40292-016-0177-9
PMID:28058623
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Hypertension is the leading cause of cardiovascular disease worldwide. Calcium channel blockers are an effective antihypertensive treatment, but frequently hypertension remains uncontrolled for many patients, partly due to tolerability issues.

AIM

To assess the tolerability and effectiveness of barnidipine in mild to moderate hypertension patients switching treatment from other calcium channel blockers in daily practice.

METHODS

BASIC-HT, a prospective real life study, enrolled 20,479 hypertensive patients initiating barnidipine treatment. The present paper focuses on a subgroup of patients in BASIC-HT for whom the previous treatment with amlodipine or lercanidipine was replaced by barnidipine. Tolerability and effectiveness of barnidipine in these patients were assessed at two visits during a 3-month follow up.

RESULTS

In 1710 mild to moderate hypertension patients switching treatment from amlodipine or lercanidipine to barnidipine monotherapy or in combination with other antihypertensive drug classes, mean blood pressure decreased during 3-month follow-up. The mean systolic blood pressure decreased from 153.15 mmHg [95% CI 152.35-153.95] at baseline to 139.20 mmHg [95% CI 138.58-139.82] at visit 3, after 3 months. The mean diastolic blood pressure decreased from 88.85 mmHg at baseline [95% CI 88.36-89.34], to 81.56 mmHg [95% CI 81.20-81.91] at visit 3. Among these patients, 65.4% replaced their initial calcium channel blocker treatment to barnidipine for tolerability reasons. During the follow-up, the main adverse event reported was edema (4.8%). The nature and frequency of events reported in this subgroup of switcher patients were in line with those reported by the total population in BASIC-HT.

CONCLUSION

This real-life study suggests that replacement of other calcium channel blockers with barnidipine is a valuable therapeutic option, especially when tolerability is an issue.

摘要

引言

高血压是全球心血管疾病的主要病因。钙通道阻滞剂是一种有效的抗高血压治疗药物,但许多患者的高血压常常仍无法得到控制,部分原因是耐受性问题。

目的

评估在日常实践中,巴尼地平对从其他钙通道阻滞剂转换治疗的轻至中度高血压患者的耐受性和有效性。

方法

BASIC-HT是一项前瞻性现实生活研究,纳入了20479名开始接受巴尼地平治疗的高血压患者。本文重点关注BASIC-HT中一组患者,他们之前使用氨氯地平或乐卡地平的治疗被巴尼地平取代。在3个月的随访期间,对这些患者进行两次访视,评估巴尼地平的耐受性和有效性。

结果

在1710名从氨氯地平或乐卡地平转换为巴尼地平单药治疗或与其他抗高血压药物联合治疗的轻至中度高血压患者中,3个月随访期间平均血压下降。3个月后,平均收缩压从基线时的153.15 mmHg[95%CI 152.35 - 153.95]降至第3次访视时的139.20 mmHg[95%CI 138.58 - 139.82]。平均舒张压从基线时的88.85 mmHg[95%CI 88.36 - 89.34]降至第3次访视时的81.56 mmHg[95%CI 81.20 - 81.91]。在这些患者中,65.4%因耐受性原因将初始钙通道阻滞剂治疗换成了巴尼地平。随访期间,报告的主要不良事件是水肿(4.8%)。该转换治疗患者亚组中报告的事件性质和频率与BASIC-HT总体人群报告的一致。

结论

这项现实生活研究表明,用巴尼地平替代其他钙通道阻滞剂是一种有价值的治疗选择,尤其是在耐受性成为问题时。

相似文献

1
Replacement of Amlodipine and Lercanidipine by Barnidipine: Tolerability and Effectiveness in a Real-Life Study.用巴尼地平替代氨氯地平和乐卡地平:一项真实生活研究中的耐受性和有效性
High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2017 Mar;24(1):29-36. doi: 10.1007/s40292-016-0177-9.
2
Tolerability of high doses of lercanidipine versus high doses of other dihydropyridines in daily clinical practice: the TOLERANCE Study.在日常临床实践中高剂量乐卡地平与高剂量其他二氢吡啶类药物的耐受性比较:耐受性研究
Cardiovasc Ther. 2008 Spring;26(1):2-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-3466.2007.00035.x.
3
Barnidipine compared to lercanidipine in addition to losartan on endothelial damage and oxidative stress parameters in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus.在高血压合并2型糖尿病患者中,对比巴尼地平与乐卡地平联合氯沙坦对内皮损伤和氧化应激参数的影响。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 Apr 12;16:66. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0237-z.
4
Barnidipine real-life tolerability in arterial hypertension: results from the BASIC-HT study.巴尼地平在动脉高血压患者中的实际耐受性:BASIC-HT研究结果
Acta Clin Belg. 2015 Aug;70(4):244-50. doi: 10.1179/2295333715Y.0000000012. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
5
Treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension with calcium channel blockers: a multicentre comparison of once-daily nifedipine GITS with once-daily amlodipine.钙通道阻滞剂治疗轻至中度高血压:一日一次硝苯地平控释片与一日一次氨氯地平的多中心比较
Curr Med Res Opin. 2003;19(3):226-37. doi: 10.1185/030079903125001677.
6
Efficacy and tolerability of once-daily barnidipine in the clinical management of patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.一日一次服用巴尼地平治疗轻度至中度原发性高血压患者的疗效及耐受性
Blood Press Suppl. 1998;1:15-21. doi: 10.1080/080370598438555.
7
Results of a phase III, 8-week, multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial to assess the effects of amlodipine camsylate versus amlodipine besylate in Korean adults with mild to moderate hypertension.一项三期、为期8周、多中心、前瞻性、随机、双盲、平行组临床试验的结果,该试验旨在评估坎地沙坦酯与苯磺酸氨氯地平对韩国轻至中度高血压成年人的疗效。
Clin Ther. 2007 Sep;29(9):1924-36. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.09.018.
8
I-ADD study: assessment of efficacy and safety profile of irbesartan/amlodipine fixed-dose combination therapy compared with irbesartan monotherapy in hypertensive patients uncontrolled with irbesartan 150 mg monotherapy: a multicenter, phase III, prospective, randomized, open-label with blinded-end point evaluation study.I-ADD 研究:评估在无法用厄贝沙坦 150mg 单药治疗控制的高血压患者中,与厄贝沙坦单药治疗相比,厄贝沙坦/氨氯地平固定剂量联合治疗的疗效和安全性:一项多中心、III 期、前瞻性、随机、开放标签、以盲终点评估的研究。
Clin Ther. 2012 Aug;34(8):1720-34.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.07.001. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
9
I-COMBINE study: assessment of efficacy and safety profile of irbesartan/amlodipine fixed-dose combination therapy compared with amlodipine monotherapy in hypertensive patients uncontrolled with amlodipine 5 mg monotherapy: a multicenter, phase III, prospective, randomized, open-label with blinded-end point evaluation study.I-COMBINE 研究:与氨氯地平 5mg 单药治疗相比,评估厄贝沙坦/氨氯地平固定剂量复方治疗对未经氨氯地平 5mg 单药治疗控制不佳的高血压患者的疗效和安全性:一项多中心、III 期、前瞻性、随机、开放标签、以盲终点评估的研究。
Clin Ther. 2012 Aug;34(8):1705-19. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.06.026. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
10
Real-world effectiveness of amlodipine/valsartan and amlodipine/valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide in high-risk patients and other subgroups.氨氯地平/缬沙坦及氨氯地平/缬沙坦/氢氯噻嗪在高危患者及其他亚组中的真实世界有效性。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2015 Jan 21;11:71-8. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S76599. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Barnidipine as a potential alternative treatment for Raynaud's phenomenon secondary to systemic sclerosis: a retrospective pilot study.氨氯地平作为系统性硬化症继发雷诺现象的潜在替代治疗方法:一项回顾性试点研究。
Clin Rheumatol. 2025 Jan;44(1):299-304. doi: 10.1007/s10067-024-07238-2. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
2
How to Improve Effectiveness and Adherence to Antihypertensive Drug Therapy: Central Role of Dihydropyridinic Calcium Channel Blockers in Hypertension.如何提高抗高血压药物治疗的有效性和依从性:二氢吡啶类钙通道阻滞剂在高血压治疗中的核心作用
High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2018 Mar;25(1):25-34. doi: 10.1007/s40292-017-0242-z. Epub 2017 Dec 2.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Angiotensin System Blockade Combined With Calcium Channel Blockers Is Superior to Other Combinations in Cardiovascular Protection With Similar Blood Pressure Reduction: A Meta-Analysis in 20,451 Hypertensive Patients.血管紧张素系统阻滞剂联合钙通道阻滞剂在降低血压相似的情况下,在心血管保护方面优于其他联合用药:对20451例高血压患者的荟萃分析。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2016 Aug;18(8):801-8. doi: 10.1111/jch.12771. Epub 2016 Jan 17.
2
Barnidipine real-life tolerability in arterial hypertension: results from the BASIC-HT study.巴尼地平在动脉高血压患者中的实际耐受性:BASIC-HT研究结果
Acta Clin Belg. 2015 Aug;70(4):244-50. doi: 10.1179/2295333715Y.0000000012. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
3
Calcium Channel Blockers for the Clinical Management of Hypertension.
用于高血压临床管理的钙通道阻滞剂
High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2018 Mar;25(1):1-3. doi: 10.1007/s40292-017-0233-0. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
Antihypertensive effect of barnidipine 10 mg or amlodipine 5 to 10 mg once daily in treatment-naive patients with essential hypertension: A 24-week, randomized, open-label, pilot study.
在初治原发性高血压患者中,每日一次服用10毫克巴尼地平或5至10毫克氨氯地平的降压效果:一项为期24周的随机、开放标签的试点研究。
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2008 Jun;69(3):192-206. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2008.06.002.
4
Antihypertensive therapy: from 2003 to 2013 and beyond.
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2013 Nov;11(11):1443-6. doi: 10.1586/14779072.2013.843451.
5
2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).2013年欧洲高血压学会(ESH)和欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)动脉高血压管理指南:欧洲高血压学会(ESH)和欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)动脉高血压管理特别工作组
J Hypertens. 2013 Jul;31(7):1281-357. doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000431740.32696.cc.
6
Pill burden in hypertensive patients treated with single-pill combination therapy--an observational study.单片复方制剂治疗的高血压患者的药物负担——一项观察性研究。
Adv Ther. 2013 Apr;30(4):406-19. doi: 10.1007/s12325-013-0018-3. Epub 2013 Mar 25.
7
Key advances in antihypertensive treatment.抗高血压治疗的主要进展。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2012 Mar 20;9(5):276-85. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2012.33.
8
Heterogeneity in antihypertensive treatment discontinuation between drugs belonging to the same class.同种类降压药治疗中断的异质性。
J Hypertens. 2011 May;29(5):1012-8. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32834550d0.
9
Effect of renin-angiotensin system blockade on calcium channel blocker-associated peripheral edema.血管紧张素系统阻滞剂对钙通道阻滞剂相关外周水肿的影响。
Am J Med. 2011 Feb;124(2):128-35. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.08.007.
10
Optimizing blood pressure control through the use of fixed combinations.通过使用固定复方制剂优化血压控制。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2010 May 25;6:321-5. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.s9989.