Tippie College of Business, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52240, USA.
Health Econ. 2011 May;20(5):505-18. doi: 10.1002/hec.1606.
Specialty hospitals have lower mortality rates for cardiac revascularization than general hospitals, but previous studies have found that this advantage disappears after adjusting for patient characteristics and hospital procedural volume. Questions have been raised about whether simultaneous relationships between volume and mortality might have biased these analyses. We use two-stage least squares with Hospital Quality Alliance scores and estimated market size as instruments for mortality and volume to control for possible simultaneity. After this adjustment, it is still the case that specialty hospitals do not have an advantage over general hospitals in mortality rates after cardiac revascularization. We find evidence of simultaneity in the relationship between volume and mortality.
专科医院在心脏血运重建方面的死亡率低于综合医院,但以往的研究发现,在调整患者特征和医院手术量后,这种优势就消失了。有人质疑,在分析中,死亡率和数量之间是否存在同时性关系,从而产生了偏差。我们使用两阶段最小二乘法,利用医院质量联盟评分和估计的市场规模作为死亡率和数量的工具,以控制可能的同时性。经过这种调整,在心脏血运重建后的死亡率方面,专科医院仍然没有优于综合医院的优势。我们发现,在数量与死亡率之间的关系中存在同时性的证据。