Hentschker Corinna, Mennicken Roman, Reifferscheid Antonius, Wasem Jürgen, Wübker Ansgar
, Essen, Germany.
FOM University of Applied Sciences, Essen Landschaftsverband Rheinland, Cologne, Germany.
Health Econ Rev. 2018 Sep 26;8(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13561-018-0204-8.
This paper analyses the volume-outcome relationship and the effects of minimum volume regulations in the German hospital sector.
We use a full sample of administrative data from the unselected, complete German hospital population for the years 2005 to 2007. We apply regression methods to analyze the association between volume and hospital quality. We measure hospital quality with a binary variable, which indicates whether the patient has died in hospital. Using simulation techniques we examine the impact of the minimum volume regulations on the accessibility of hospital services.
We find a highly significant negative relationship between case volume and mortality for complex interventions at the pancreas and oesophagus as well as for knee replacement. For liver, kidney and stem cell transplantation as well as for CABG we could not find a strong association between volume and quality. Access to hospital care is only moderately affected by minimum volume regulations.
The effectiveness of minimum volume regulations depends on the type of intervention. Depending on the type of intervention, quality gains can be expected at the cost of slightly decreased access to care.
本文分析了德国医院部门的手术量-结果关系以及最低手术量规定的影响。
我们使用了2005年至2007年德国未选的完整医院人群的行政数据全样本。我们应用回归方法来分析手术量与医院质量之间的关联。我们用一个二元变量来衡量医院质量,该变量表明患者是否在医院死亡。使用模拟技术,我们研究了最低手术量规定对医院服务可及性的影响。
我们发现,对于胰腺和食道的复杂手术以及膝关节置换手术,病例数与死亡率之间存在高度显著的负相关关系。对于肝脏、肾脏和干细胞移植以及冠状动脉搭桥术,我们没有发现手术量与质量之间有很强的关联。最低手术量规定对获得医院护理的影响仅为中等程度。
最低手术量规定的有效性取决于干预类型。根据干预类型的不同,在护理可及性略有下降的代价下,可以预期质量会有所提高。