School of Biomedical Engineering, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi, China.
Microvasc Res. 2011 Nov;82(3):277-83. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2011.03.008. Epub 2011 Mar 23.
Whether static magnetic field (SMF) can affect microcirculation and microvasculature in human is still ambiguous. In this study, laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) combined with spectral analysis by wavelet transform was applied to investigate acute SMF-related effects on resting skin blood flow (SBF) at the nail walls. 18 healthy young male volunteers were randomly categorized into two groups: (1) intervention group (INT; n=9) and (2) control group (CTL; n=9). In each group, three 30-minute intervals (pre-exposure, exposure and post-exposure intervals) of continuous LDF recording were taken to evaluate the baseline, SMF effects and its deferred effects. During the exposure interval in the INT group, a neodymium-iron-boron magnet was laid under the middle finger prominence while a sham was used in the CTL group. The effective flux density range of SMF along the axis of the magnet was about 46 to 223 mT between the sites of SBF measurement and the magnet. No intervention existed during other 30-minute intervals in either group. Thereafter, analysis of variance with repeated-measures combined with Bonferroni's multiple comparison tests was adopted to analyze the SBF value and its spectral variants obtained by wavelet transform. The major finding of this study was that SMF exposure induced significant increases in the absolute amplitudes of frequency band III and V (aIII and aV), which indicated intrinsic myogenic and endothelial related activities (P<0.05) respectively while the mean amplitude of SBF flux still maintain on the basal level (P>0.05). Furthermore, after removal of the SMF, variations of rhythmic flow motion of SBF in SMF exposure interval vanished gradually, which suggest the limitations of the deferred-effect of SMF on SBF.
静磁场(SMF)是否会影响人体的微循环和微血管仍然存在争议。在这项研究中,我们应用激光多普勒血流仪(LDF)结合小波变换的频谱分析来研究急性 SMF 对指甲壁静止皮肤血流(SBF)的相关影响。18 名健康年轻男性志愿者被随机分为两组:(1)干预组(INT;n=9)和(2)对照组(CTL;n=9)。在每组中,连续记录 3 个 30 分钟的 LDF 间隔(预暴露、暴露和暴露后间隔),以评估基线、SMF 效应及其延迟效应。在 INT 组的暴露间隔期间,将钕铁硼磁铁置于中指突出部位下方,而 CTL 组则使用假磁铁。SMF 沿磁铁轴的有效磁通密度范围在 SBF 测量部位和磁铁之间约为 46 至 223 mT。在两组的其他 30 分钟间隔内均无干预。此后,采用重复测量方差分析结合 Bonferroni 多重比较检验分析小波变换得到的 SBF 值及其频谱变体。本研究的主要发现是,SMF 暴露引起了频带 III 和 V(aIII 和 aV)的绝对幅度的显著增加,这分别表明了内在的肌源性和内皮相关活动(P<0.05),而 SBF 流量的平均幅度仍保持在基础水平(P>0.05)。此外,在去除 SMF 后,SMF 暴露间隔中 SBF 的节律性流动变化逐渐消失,这表明 SMF 对 SBF 的延迟效应存在局限性。
Microvasc Res. 2005-1
Bioelectromagnetics. 2007-7
Bioelectromagnetics. 2005-5
Microvasc Res. 2014-9
North Clin Istanb. 2018-9
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013-12-17