• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

二尖瓣手术培训不会影响早期结果和中期生存率:一项多中心分析。

Training in mitral valve surgery need not affect early outcomes and midterm survival: a multicentre analysis.

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Austin Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Oct;40(4):826-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.02.003. Epub 2011 Mar 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.02.003
PMID:21440451
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Mitral valve surgery may be regarded as less favourable for training, due to greater mortality risk, technical complexity, and difficulty for the supervisor to observe. We examined this perception by reviewing a multicentre experience.

METHODS

We analysed a multicentre database over a 7-year period containing 2216 isolated and combined mitral procedures. Of these, 2048 were performed by consultants and 168 by trainees (92% vs 8%) of varying seniority. Preoperative characteristics, early postoperative outcomes and 6-year survival were compared between groups. Propensity-score matching was performed to correct for group differences.

RESULTS

Trainees were less likely to operate on patients, who had previously undergone coronary surgery (consultant 4.3% vs trainee 1.2%, p=0.043) and those with moderate to severe mitral regurgitation (86% vs 81%, p=0.012). There were no other statistically significant differences in preoperative variables, such as urgency, endocarditis and left-ventricular dysfunction. There were similar rates of mitral valve repair (48% vs 51%, p=0.48). Trainees were more likely to operate on rheumatic valve pathology (20% vs 28%, p=0.012). Intra-operatively, trainees had longer aortic cross-clamp times (119 ± 52 vs 136 ± 50 min, p=0.0001). At 30 days, mortality was comparable (4.5% vs 3.6%, p=0.56) with a trend towards higher any mortality/morbidity in consultant procedures (33% vs 26%, p=0.059). At 6 years, survival was similar (79 ± 1.4% vs 78 ± 4.0%, p=0.73). After derivation of 142 propensity-score-matched patient pairs, trainees cases still experienced longer cross-clamp times (121 ± 58 vs 137 ± 52 min, p=0.023), but there was similar 30-day mortality (4.2% vs 3.5%, p>0.99) and any mortality/morbidity (28% vs 24%, p=0.52). Six-year survival between matched pairs was also similar (74 ± 7.2% vs 80 ± 4.4%, p=0.64). Trainee status did not predict early or late adverse events after multivariate Cox regression with and without propensity-score adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS

Trainee outcomes are not inferior even when corrected for risk. This suggests that excellent operative training and supervision can be achieved in mitral valve surgery.

摘要

目的

由于二尖瓣手术死亡率较高、技术复杂且难以让上级观察,其可能被视为培训效果不佳。我们通过多中心经验回顾来检验这种看法。

方法

我们分析了一个包含 2216 例单纯和联合二尖瓣手术的 7 年多中心数据库。其中 2048 例由顾问完成,168 例由不同级别受训者(92%比 8%)完成。比较两组患者的术前特征、术后早期结局和 6 年生存率。使用倾向评分匹配来纠正组间差异。

结果

受训者较少对之前接受过冠状动脉手术(顾问 4.3%比受训者 1.2%,p=0.043)和中重度二尖瓣反流(顾问 86%比受训者 81%,p=0.012)的患者进行手术。在术前变量方面,如紧急情况、心内膜炎和左心室功能障碍,两组之间没有其他统计学差异。二尖瓣瓣修复率相似(顾问 48%比受训者 51%,p=0.48)。受训者更倾向于对风湿性瓣膜病变进行手术(顾问 20%比受训者 28%,p=0.012)。术中,受训者的主动脉阻断时间更长(119±52比 136±50 分钟,p=0.0001)。术后 30 天死亡率相当(顾问 4.5%比受训者 3.6%,p=0.56),顾问手术中任何死亡率/发病率较高的趋势(顾问 33%比受训者 26%,p=0.059)。6 年生存率相似(顾问 79±1.4%比受训者 78±4.0%,p=0.73)。在得出 142 对倾向评分匹配的患者对后,受训者的手术仍经历更长的主动脉阻断时间(121±58 比 137±52 分钟,p=0.023),但术后 30 天死亡率相似(顾问 4.2%比受训者 3.5%,p>0.99)和任何死亡率/发病率相似(顾问 28%比受训者 24%,p=0.52)。匹配对之间的 6 年生存率也相似(顾问 74±7.2%比受训者 80±4.4%,p=0.64)。多变量 Cox 回归分析,无论是否进行倾向评分调整,受训者的状态都不能预测早期或晚期不良事件。

结论

即使经过风险校正,受训者的结果也不劣。这表明在二尖瓣手术中可以实现出色的手术培训和监督。

相似文献

1
Training in mitral valve surgery need not affect early outcomes and midterm survival: a multicentre analysis.二尖瓣手术培训不会影响早期结果和中期生存率:一项多中心分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Oct;40(4):826-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.02.003. Epub 2011 Mar 26.
2
Excellent short- and long-term outcomes after concomitant aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting performed by surgeons in training.培训外科医生同期行主动脉瓣置换术和冠状动脉旁路移植术的短期和长期效果良好。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Feb;145(2):334-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.09.073. Epub 2012 Oct 27.
3
Aortic and mitral valve surgery on the beating heart is lowering cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross clamp time.心脏不停跳下的主动脉瓣和二尖瓣手术正在缩短体外循环和主动脉阻断时间。
Heart Surg Forum. 2002;5(2):182-6.
4
Training residents in mitral valve surgery.培训住院医师进行二尖瓣手术。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Oct;78(4):1236-40. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.04.041.
5
Training surgeon status is not associated with an increased risk of early or late mortality after isolated aortic valve replacement surgery.在单纯主动脉瓣置换手术后,受训外科医生的身份与早期或晚期死亡风险增加无关。
Cardiol J. 2014;21(2):183-90. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2013.0087. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
6
Effect of training in mitral valve repair surgery on the early and late outcome.二尖瓣修复手术培训对早期和晚期结果的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Jul;80(1):183-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.01.037.
7
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 2--isolated valve surgery.胸外科医师协会2008年心脏手术风险模型:第2部分——单纯瓣膜手术
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Jul;88(1 Suppl):S23-42. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.05.056.
8
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 3--valve plus coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.胸外科医师协会2008年心脏手术风险模型:第3部分——瓣膜置换加冠状动脉搭桥手术
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Jul;88(1 Suppl):S43-62. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.05.055.
9
[The best of valvular heart disease in 2006].[2006年心脏瓣膜病研究精粹]
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 2007 Jan;100 Spec No 1:19-28.
10
Effect of training on outcomes following coronary artery bypass graft surgery.冠状动脉搭桥手术后训练对预后的影响。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004 Apr;25(4):591-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2003.12.012.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a systematic safety analysis.微创二尖瓣手术:系统安全性分析
Open Heart. 2020 Oct;7(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001393.