Exner G U, von Hochstetter A R, Uehlinger K
Klinik Balgrist, Orthopädische Universitätsklinik und Schweizerisches Paraplegikerzentrum, Zürich.
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1990 May-Jun;128(3):308-12. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1039999.
The typical radiologic finding of a "non-ossifying fibroma" of the distal femoral metaphysis was seen in a 17-year-old female patient with pain in the distal femur. The rapid development of this lesion was confirmed on the basis of earlier radiographs performed to clarify other complaints. Since the lesion had developed in no more than 34 months, with pronounced scintigraphic and MRI signal intensity, particularly in the late phase, and pain had prompted the patient to seek examination, the cause was assumed to be a neoplasia rather than a growth disorder. Histopathological examination revealed a proliferative fibrohistiocytic lesion which was histologically different from a malignant fibrous histiocytoma. The finding indicates that in the differential diagnosis between non-ossifying fibroma and benign fibrous histiocytoma in cases with identical localization, pain and the intensity of the scintigraphic signal may well be the key to further action: since benign fibrous histiocytomas may be regarded as genuine neoplasias, the question of malignancy should also be clarified beyond doubt.
一名17岁女性患者,股骨远端疼痛,其股骨远端干骺端出现了典型的“非骨化性纤维瘤”放射学表现。为明确其他症状而进行的早期X光检查证实了该病变的快速发展。由于该病变在不超过34个月的时间内就已形成,骨闪烁显像和磁共振成像信号强度明显,尤其是在晚期,且疼痛促使患者寻求检查,因此推测病因是肿瘤而非生长障碍。组织病理学检查显示为增生性纤维组织细胞病变,在组织学上与恶性纤维组织细胞瘤不同。这一发现表明,在相同部位、疼痛且骨闪烁显像信号强度相同的病例中,非骨化性纤维瘤与良性纤维组织细胞瘤的鉴别诊断中,疼痛和骨闪烁显像信号强度很可能是进一步诊疗的关键:由于良性纤维组织细胞瘤可被视为真正的肿瘤,恶性问题也应毫无疑问地予以明确。