• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Bioethics: philosophic bases and application].

作者信息

Sass H M

机构信息

Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057.

出版信息

Bol Oficina Sanit Panam. 1990 May-Jun;108(5-6):391-8.

PMID:2144121
Abstract

Medical ethics have traditionally been guided by principles based on classical philosophical ideas about the place of man in nature, his relation to God, health, and disease, and on the epistemological and methodological concepts of diagnosis, risk evaluation, and treatment. The virtues expected of a physician were to cause no harm, to make patients better, and to refrain from using his skills for manipulation or coercion. The good patient was supposed to trust the physician and follow the treatment. Today, technological progress and the advent of a pluralistic society that emphasizes the autonomy of informed patients make for a much more complex and changing situation. However, some pragmatic principles found in bioethical arguments may assist in resolving moral dilemmas. Sass proposes that a basis be sought in "intermediate moral principles" that have found support in various ideologies and in complementary application of several models of doctor-patient hermeneutics and communication. Responsibility for health should be shared by physician and patient and founded on knowledge, mutual respect, and a combination of skill and ethics.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Bioethics: philosophic bases and application].
Bol Oficina Sanit Panam. 1990 May-Jun;108(5-6):391-8.
2
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
3
[Qualified particularism and affiliative virtue: emphasis of a recent trend in ethics].
Rev Med Chil. 1995 Feb;123(2):241-9.
4
Bioethics for clinicians: 7. Truth telling.临床医生的生物伦理学:7. 讲真话。
CMAJ. 1997 Jan 15;156(2):225-8.
5
Can ethics take pluralism seriously?伦理学能认真对待多元主义吗?
Hastings Cent Rep. 1989 Sep-Oct;19(5):33-4.
6
On the many voices of bioethics.
Hastings Cent Rep. 1994 May-Jun;24(3):26-7.
7
[Introduction to bioethics in contemporary medicine].[当代医学中的生物伦理学导论]
Rev Med Chil. 1995 Mar;123(3):363-7.
8
Physician virtues and communicating with patients.医生的美德与医患沟通。
New Horiz. 1997 Feb;5(1):6-14.
9
[From informed to shared: the developing process of consent].从知情到共享:同意的发展过程
Minerva Pediatr. 2002 Jun;54(3):211-6.
10
[Bioethics: emerging problems and perspectives].
Recenti Prog Med. 2006 Oct;97(10):580-6.

引用本文的文献

1
[Bioethics and family medicine (and V). Working Group of the semFYC].
Aten Primaria. 2000 Apr 30;25(7):505-11. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(00)78553-2.