• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从诊断开始就用甘精胰岛素对比 NPH 胰岛素治疗 1 型糖尿病儿童,1 年后 HbA1c 降低:一项回顾性研究。

Lower HbA1c after 1 year, in children with type 1 diabetes treated with insulin glargine vs. NPH insulin from diagnosis: a retrospective study.

机构信息

Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institute and University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Pediatr Diabetes. 2011 Aug;12(5):501-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2010.00723.x. Epub 2011 Mar 28.

DOI:10.1111/j.1399-5448.2010.00723.x
PMID:21443584
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Insulin glargine offers sustained insulin delivery for 24 h. Change to glargine treatment consistently results in lower fasting glucose and fewer hypoglycemic episodes in children with type 1 diabetes compared to continuation of NPH, although glargine has not been shown to improve HbA1c in randomized trials. Studies comparing glargine and NPH in multiple injection therapy in children treated from diagnosis of type 1 diabetes are lacking.

METHODS

HbA1c and insulin requirement were compared in a retrospective study of children (7-17 yr of age) with type 1 diabetes treated from diagnosis with basal insulin glargine (n = 49) or NPH (n = 49) in a multiple injection therapy (MIT) regimen with a rapid-acting insulin analogue. Patients were followed every third month for 1 yr. HbA1c, insulin dose, and weight data were retrieved.

RESULTS

HbA1c (mean ± SD) was lower at 3-5 months (5.5 ± 0.89 vs. 6.2 ± 0.89%, p < 0.05) and 6-9 months (5.6 ± 1.14 vs. 6.6 ± 0.99%; p < 0.001) in glargine treated. After 12 months, HbA1c was significantly lower in glargine treated (6.3 ± 1.56 vs. 7.1 ± 1.28; p < 0.01). Reported total insulin doses were similar at nadir (0.5 U/kg BW × 24 h), but significantly lower at 12 months in glargine treated (0.64 ± 0.23 vs. 0.86 ± 0.3 U/kg BW × 24 h; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

HbA1c 1 yr from diagnosis was lower in children treated with glargine from start as compared with those on NPH. This observation should be viewed in the light of a significantly lower dose of total daily insulin in the glargine group.

摘要

目的

甘精胰岛素可提供 24 小时持续胰岛素输送。与继续使用 NPH 相比,改用甘精胰岛素治疗可使 1 型糖尿病儿童的空腹血糖降低,低血糖发作次数减少,尽管在随机试验中,甘精胰岛素并未显示能改善 HbA1c。缺乏比较在诊断为 1 型糖尿病后开始接受甘精胰岛素和 NPH 多次注射治疗的儿童的研究。

方法

在一项回顾性研究中,比较了从诊断开始接受基础胰岛素甘精胰岛素(n = 49)或 NPH(n = 49)治疗的 1 型糖尿病儿童(7-17 岁)的 HbA1c 和胰岛素需求,他们采用速效胰岛素类似物进行多次注射治疗(MIT)方案。患者每 3 个月随访 1 年,检索 HbA1c、胰岛素剂量和体重数据。

结果

甘精胰岛素治疗的 3-5 个月(5.5 ± 0.89 与 6.2 ± 0.89%,p < 0.05)和 6-9 个月(5.6 ± 1.14 与 6.6 ± 0.99%,p < 0.001)的 HbA1c 较低。治疗 12 个月后,甘精胰岛素治疗的 HbA1c 明显降低(6.3 ± 1.56 与 7.1 ± 1.28%,p < 0.01)。最低时的总胰岛素剂量报告相似(0.5 U/kg BW × 24 h),但甘精胰岛素治疗的 12 个月时明显降低(0.64 ± 0.23 与 0.86 ± 0.3 U/kg BW × 24 h;p < 0.001)。

结论

与 NPH 相比,从诊断开始接受甘精胰岛素治疗的儿童在诊断后 1 年的 HbA1c 降低。这一观察结果应结合甘精胰岛素组总日胰岛素剂量显著降低来看待。

相似文献

1
Lower HbA1c after 1 year, in children with type 1 diabetes treated with insulin glargine vs. NPH insulin from diagnosis: a retrospective study.从诊断开始就用甘精胰岛素对比 NPH 胰岛素治疗 1 型糖尿病儿童,1 年后 HbA1c 降低:一项回顾性研究。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2011 Aug;12(5):501-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2010.00723.x. Epub 2011 Mar 28.
2
(Ultra-)long-acting insulin analogues for people with type 1 diabetes mellitus.(超)长效胰岛素类似物用于 1 型糖尿病患者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 4;3(3):CD013498. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013498.pub2.
3
Negative binomial meta-regression analysis of combined glycosylated hemoglobin and hypoglycemia outcomes across eleven Phase III and IV studies of insulin glargine compared with neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus.在11项关于甘精胰岛素与中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素治疗1型和2型糖尿病的III期和IV期研究中,对糖化血红蛋白和低血糖结局合并数据进行的负二项式meta回归分析。
Clin Ther. 2007 Aug;29(8):1607-19. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.08.020.
4
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of insulin glargine and insulin detemir with NPH insulin in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus receiving intensive insulin therapy.在接受强化胰岛素治疗的1型糖尿病儿童和青少年中,甘精胰岛素和地特胰岛素与中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素的疗效和安全性比较。
J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2009;1(4):181-7. doi: 10.4274/jcrpe.v1i4.56. Epub 2009 May 4.
5
Use of glargine in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a case-control study.甘精胰岛素在1型糖尿病孕妇中的应用:一项病例对照研究。
Clin Ther. 2008 Aug;30(8):1476-84. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.08.013.
6
Better long-term glycaemic control with the basal insulin glargine as compared with NPH in patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus given meal-time lispro insulin.在1型糖尿病患者中,给予餐时赖脯胰岛素的情况下,与中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素相比,甘精胰岛素基础胰岛素治疗能实现更好的长期血糖控制。
Diabet Med. 2004 Nov;21(11):1213-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01323.x.
7
Glargine is superior to neutral protamine Hagedorn for improving glycated haemoglobin and fasting blood glucose levels during intensive insulin therapy.在强化胰岛素治疗期间,甘精胰岛素在改善糖化血红蛋白和空腹血糖水平方面优于中性精蛋白锌胰岛素。
Intern Med J. 2005 Sep;35(9):536-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2005.00902.x.
8
Long-term efficacy of insulin glargine after switching from NPH insulin as intensive replacement of basal insulin in Japanese diabetes mellitus. Comparison of efficacy between type 1 and type 2 diabetes (JUN-LAN Study 1.2).在日本糖尿病患者中,从NPH胰岛素转换为甘精胰岛素作为基础胰岛素强化替代治疗后的长期疗效。1型和2型糖尿病疗效比较(JUN-LAN研究1.2)
Endocr J. 2007 Dec;54(6):975-83. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.k07e-035. Epub 2007 Nov 14.
9
Improved glycaemic control by switching from insulin NPH to insulin glargine: a retrospective observational study.从NPH胰岛素转换为甘精胰岛素改善血糖控制:一项回顾性观察研究。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2009 Jan 19;8:3. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-8-3.
10
Basal insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: 28-week comparison of insulin glargine (HOE 901) and NPH insulin.2型糖尿病的基础胰岛素治疗:甘精胰岛素(HOE 901)与中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素的28周比较
Diabetes Care. 2001 Apr;24(4):631-6. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.4.631.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of Life of Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Using Insulin Analog Glargine Compared with NPH Insulin: A Systematic Review and Policy Implications.胰岛素类似物甘精胰岛素与 NPH 胰岛素治疗 1 型糖尿病患者的生活质量比较:系统评价及政策启示。
Patient. 2018 Aug;11(4):377-389. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0291-3.
2
Clinical Effectiveness and Safety of Analog Glargine in Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.甘精胰岛素类似物治疗1型糖尿病的临床疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Diabetes Ther. 2016 Jun;7(2):241-58. doi: 10.1007/s13300-016-0166-y. Epub 2016 Apr 5.
3
Pediatric diabetes consortium T1D New Onset (NeOn) study: clinical outcomes during the first year following diagnosis.
儿科糖尿病联盟 T1D 新发病(NeOn)研究:诊断后第一年的临床结局。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2014 Jun;15(4):287-93. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12068. Epub 2013 Aug 15.