• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在接受强化胰岛素治疗的1型糖尿病儿童和青少年中,甘精胰岛素和地特胰岛素与中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素的疗效和安全性比较。

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of insulin glargine and insulin detemir with NPH insulin in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus receiving intensive insulin therapy.

作者信息

Dündar Bumin Nuri, Dündar Nihal, Eren Erdal

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Süleyman Demirel University, Faculty of Medicine, Isparta, Turkey.

出版信息

J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2009;1(4):181-7. doi: 10.4274/jcrpe.v1i4.56. Epub 2009 May 4.

DOI:10.4274/jcrpe.v1i4.56
PMID:21274293
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3005656/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of insulin glargine and detemir with NPH insulin in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM).

METHODS

Thirty four children and adolescents with type 1 DM (mean age 12.7 ± 3.4 years, diabetes duration 5.4 ± 3.0 years) were included in the study. All patients had been receiving intensive insulin therapy with insulin aspart and NPH for at least 6 months before switching from NPH to insulin glargine (Group 1, n=19) or detemir (Group 2, n=15). The medical records obtained within 6 months before and after treatment with insulin glargine and detemir were retrospectively reviewed and the data were compared in each group.

RESULTS

The mean age and duration of DM were similar in two groups (p>0.05). In both groups, switching from NPH to insulin glargine or detemir, resulted in a reduction in HbA(1c) (p0.05, for both). Patients in the detemir treated group had less increment in body mass index (BMI) SDS at the end of 6 months of therapy compared to NPH and glargine treated patients (p>0.05, for both). No side effects were noted throughout the study.

CONCLUSION

Both insulin glargine and detemir improved HbA(1c) at short-term and proved to be safe and well tolerated in children and adolescents with type 1 DM.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较甘精胰岛素和地特胰岛素与中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素(NPH胰岛素)在1型糖尿病儿童及青少年中的疗效和安全性。

方法

34例1型糖尿病儿童及青少年(平均年龄12.7±3.4岁,糖尿病病程5.4±3.0年)纳入本研究。所有患者在从NPH胰岛素转换为甘精胰岛素(1组,n=19)或地特胰岛素(2组,n=15)之前,均已接受门冬胰岛素和NPH胰岛素强化治疗至少6个月。回顾性分析甘精胰岛素和地特胰岛素治疗前后6个月内的病历,并对每组数据进行比较。

结果

两组患者的平均年龄和糖尿病病程相似(p>0.05)。两组中,从NPH胰岛素转换为甘精胰岛素或地特胰岛素后,糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)均降低(两者p均<0.05)。与NPH胰岛素和甘精胰岛素治疗的患者相比,地特胰岛素治疗组患者在治疗6个月末体重指数(BMI)标准差评分的增加较少(两者p>0.05)。在整个研究过程中未观察到副作用。

结论

甘精胰岛素和地特胰岛素在短期内均改善了HbA1c,且在1型糖尿病儿童及青少年中被证明是安全且耐受性良好的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f133/3005656/02051e048ef4/JCRPE-1-181-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f133/3005656/baf9408b6d9e/JCRPE-1-181-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f133/3005656/2995ea215824/JCRPE-1-181-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f133/3005656/85a8737e3a78/JCRPE-1-181-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f133/3005656/02051e048ef4/JCRPE-1-181-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f133/3005656/baf9408b6d9e/JCRPE-1-181-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f133/3005656/2995ea215824/JCRPE-1-181-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f133/3005656/85a8737e3a78/JCRPE-1-181-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f133/3005656/02051e048ef4/JCRPE-1-181-g5.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of insulin glargine and insulin detemir with NPH insulin in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus receiving intensive insulin therapy.在接受强化胰岛素治疗的1型糖尿病儿童和青少年中,甘精胰岛素和地特胰岛素与中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素的疗效和安全性比较。
J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2009;1(4):181-7. doi: 10.4274/jcrpe.v1i4.56. Epub 2009 May 4.
2
(Ultra-)long-acting insulin analogues for people with type 1 diabetes mellitus.(超)长效胰岛素类似物用于 1 型糖尿病患者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 4;3(3):CD013498. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013498.pub2.
3
(Ultra-)long-acting insulin analogues versus NPH insulin (human isophane insulin) for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.超长效胰岛素类似物与中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素(人低精蛋白胰岛素)用于2型糖尿病成人患者的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 9;11(11):CD005613. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005613.pub4.
4
Changing basal insulin from NPH to detemir or glargine in patients with type 1 diabetes and a history of severe hypoglycemia.将1型糖尿病且有严重低血糖病史患者的基础胰岛素从NPH改为地特胰岛素或甘精胰岛素。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2009;5(1):121-8. Epub 2009 Apr 8.
5
Lower within-subject variability of insulin detemir in comparison to NPH insulin and insulin glargine in people with type 1 diabetes.与NPH胰岛素和甘精胰岛素相比,地特胰岛素在1型糖尿病患者中的个体内变异性更低。
Diabetes. 2004 Jun;53(6):1614-20. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.53.6.1614.
6
Long-term efficacy of insulin glargine after switching from NPH insulin as intensive replacement of basal insulin in Japanese diabetes mellitus. Comparison of efficacy between type 1 and type 2 diabetes (JUN-LAN Study 1.2).在日本糖尿病患者中,从NPH胰岛素转换为甘精胰岛素作为基础胰岛素强化替代治疗后的长期疗效。1型和2型糖尿病疗效比较(JUN-LAN研究1.2)
Endocr J. 2007 Dec;54(6):975-83. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.k07e-035. Epub 2007 Nov 14.
7
Effects of QD insulin detemir or neutral protamine Hagedorn on blood glucose control in patients with type I diabetes mellitus using a basal-bolus regimen.使用基础-餐时胰岛素治疗方案时,地特胰岛素或中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素对1型糖尿病患者血糖控制的影响。
Clin Ther. 2004 May;26(5):724-36. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(04)90072-0.
8
Glargine is superior to neutral protamine Hagedorn for improving glycated haemoglobin and fasting blood glucose levels during intensive insulin therapy.在强化胰岛素治疗期间,甘精胰岛素在改善糖化血红蛋白和空腹血糖水平方面优于中性精蛋白锌胰岛素。
Intern Med J. 2005 Sep;35(9):536-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2005.00902.x.
9
Better long-term glycaemic control with the basal insulin glargine as compared with NPH in patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus given meal-time lispro insulin.在1型糖尿病患者中,给予餐时赖脯胰岛素的情况下,与中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素相比,甘精胰岛素基础胰岛素治疗能实现更好的长期血糖控制。
Diabet Med. 2004 Nov;21(11):1213-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01323.x.
10
Evaluation of the incidence and risk of hypoglycemic coma associated with selection of basal insulin in the treatment of diabetes: a Finnish register linkage study.糖尿病治疗中基础胰岛素选择与低血糖昏迷发生率及风险的评估:一项芬兰登记链接研究
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Dec;22(12):1326-35. doi: 10.1002/pds.3534. Epub 2013 Oct 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of switching from neutral protamine hagedorn insulin (NPH) to glargine insulin on glycemic control and clinical outcomes in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes.从中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素(NPH)转换为甘精胰岛素对1型糖尿病儿科患者血糖控制及临床结局的影响。
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2025 May 2;18:100612. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100612. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL Therapy in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes.胰岛素甘精 300U/mL 治疗 1 型糖尿病患儿和青少年。
Paediatr Drugs. 2022 Sep;24(5):499-512. doi: 10.1007/s40272-022-00520-3. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
3
The Comparative Dosing and Glycemic Control of Intermediate and Long-Acting Insulins in Adult Patients With Type 1 and 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

本文引用的文献

1
Insulin analogues: an example of applied medical science.胰岛素类似物:应用医学科学的一个实例。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2009 Jan;11(1):5-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2008.01015.x.
2
Less weight gain and hypoglycaemia with once-daily insulin detemir than NPH insulin in intensification of insulin therapy in overweight Type 2 diabetes patients: the PREDICTIVE BMI clinical trial.在超重2型糖尿病患者强化胰岛素治疗中,与中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素相比,每日一次地特胰岛素体重增加更少且低血糖发生率更低:PREDICTIVE BMI临床试验
Diabet Med. 2008 Aug;25(8):916-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02483.x.
3
Reference body mass index curves for Turkish children 6 to 18 years of age.
1型和2型糖尿病成年患者中长效和中效胰岛素的比较剂量与血糖控制
J Pharm Technol. 2022 Feb;38(1):46-53. doi: 10.1177/87551225211055700. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
4
Insulin detemir in a twice daily insulin regimen versus a three times daily insulin regimen in the treatment of type 1 diabetes in children: A pilot randomized controlled trial.每日两次胰岛素治疗方案与每日三次胰岛素治疗方案用于儿童1型糖尿病治疗的比较:一项随机对照试验的初步研究
Int J Pediatr Endocrinol. 2011 Nov 8;2011(1):15. doi: 10.1186/1687-9856-2011-15.
6至18岁土耳其儿童的参考体重指数曲线。
J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2008 Sep;21(9):827-36. doi: 10.1515/jpem.2008.21.9.827.
4
Deleterious outcomes after abrupt transition from insulin glargine to insulin detemir in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus.1型糖尿病患者从甘精胰岛素突然转换为地特胰岛素后的不良后果。
Clin Drug Investig. 2008;28(11):697-701. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200828110-00003.
5
Insulin detemir is characterized by a more reproducible pharmacokinetic profile than insulin glargine in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: results from a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.在1型糖尿病儿童和青少年中,地特胰岛素的药代动力学特征比甘精胰岛素更具可重复性:一项随机、双盲、对照试验的结果。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2008 Dec;9(6):554-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2008.00443.x. Epub 2008 Aug 27.
6
Reduced weight gain with insulin detemir compared to NPH insulin is not explained by a reduction in hypoglycemia.与中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素相比,地特胰岛素导致体重增加减少并非由低血糖减少所致。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2008 Aug;10(4):273-7. doi: 10.1089/dia.2008.0282.
7
Insulin glargine versus intermediate-acting insulin as the basal component of multiple daily injection regimens for adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus.甘精胰岛素与中效胰岛素作为1型糖尿病青少年多次每日注射方案基础成分的比较
J Pediatr. 2008 Oct;153(4):547-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.04.063. Epub 2008 Jun 27.
8
Long-acting insulin analogues versus NPH human insulin in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis.长效胰岛素类似物与中性鱼精蛋白锌人胰岛素治疗2型糖尿病的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008 Aug;81(2):184-9. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2008.04.007. Epub 2008 May 20.
9
Long-term efficacy and safety of insulin detemir compared to Neutral Protamine Hagedorn insulin in patients with Type 1 diabetes using a treat-to-target basal-bolus regimen with insulin aspart at meals: a 2-year, randomized, controlled trial.德谷胰岛素与中性精蛋白锌胰岛素相比,在1型糖尿病患者中使用门冬胰岛素餐时基础-餐时治疗方案达到目标血糖的长期疗效和安全性:一项为期2年的随机对照试验。
Diabet Med. 2008 Apr;25(4):442-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02407.x.
10
Improved glycemic control and lower frequency of severe hypoglycemia with insulin detemir; long-term experience in 105 children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.地特胰岛素改善血糖控制并降低严重低血糖发生率:105例1型糖尿病儿童和青少年的长期经验
Pediatr Diabetes. 2008 Aug;9(4 Pt 2):382-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2008.00371.x. Epub 2008 Mar 5.