• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根治性经会阴前列腺切除术:一种过时的手术?

Radical perineal prostatectomy: An outdated procedure?

机构信息

Department of Urology, Central Hospital of Bolzano, Lorenz Böhler Street 5, 39100 Bolzano, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2011;9(5):400-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.03.027. Epub 2011 Apr 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.03.027
PMID:21443972
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Radical perineal prostatectomy (RPP) is an alternative to the retropubic, laparoscopic or robotic prostatectomy approaches. This study reports the experience with RPP of a single surgeon at a single institution; the technical aspects, oncological outcome, and complications, such as urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction, were investigated.

METHODS

A total of 212 consecutive patients with a mean age of 63 (range 45-74) years and clinically localised prostate cancer were monitored. Between January 2001 and December 2010, all patients underwent RPP that was performed by a single experienced surgeon at one institution. All data were introduced into a database focussing on the intra-operative and post-operative complications, continence rate, potency and oncological outcome.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 48 (6-117) months. Intra-operative complications, both early and late, occurred in 19% of the patients. The average length of in-hospital stay was 9 (3-45) days, and the mean period of time spent with a urethral catheter in place was 9 (4-45) days. The continence rate was 81%, and the potency rate, without any pharmacological aid, was 27%. The overall PSA-free survival rate was 86%. There was one cancer-specific death.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of our prospective data, we conclude that RPP provides satisfactory oncological results with an acceptable outcome in terms of quality of life. RPP can be considered to be mini-invasive and achieves results that are equivalent to those of the alternative surgical approaches.

摘要

目的

根治性经会阴前列腺切除术(RPP)是耻骨后、腹腔镜或机器人前列腺切除术的替代方法。本研究报告了一位外科医生在一家机构的 RPP 经验;研究了技术方面、肿瘤学结果以及尿失禁和勃起功能障碍等并发症。

方法

共监测了 212 例平均年龄为 63 岁(范围 45-74 岁)的临床局限性前列腺癌患者。2001 年 1 月至 2010 年 12 月期间,所有患者均在一家机构接受了由一位经验丰富的外科医生进行的 RPP。所有数据均录入了一个数据库,重点关注术中及术后并发症、尿控率、勃起功能和肿瘤学结果。

结果

平均随访时间为 48 个月(6-117 个月)。术中并发症,无论是早期还是晚期,发生在 19%的患者中。平均住院时间为 9 天(3-45 天),尿道置管时间平均为 9 天(4-45 天)。尿控率为 81%,无需任何药物辅助的勃起功能率为 27%。总的 PSA 无复发生存率为 86%。有一例与癌症相关的死亡。

结论

基于我们的前瞻性数据,我们得出结论,RPP 提供了令人满意的肿瘤学结果,在生活质量方面具有可接受的结果。RPP 可以被认为是微创的,并且可以达到与替代手术方法相当的结果。

相似文献

1
Radical perineal prostatectomy: An outdated procedure?根治性经会阴前列腺切除术:一种过时的手术?
Int J Surg. 2011;9(5):400-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.03.027. Epub 2011 Apr 2.
2
Oncological and functional results of antegrade radical retropubic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localised prostate cancer.顺行性耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术治疗临床局限性前列腺癌的肿瘤学和功能结果。
Eur Urol. 2008 Mar;53(3):554-61. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.07.004. Epub 2007 Jul 16.
3
Radical retropubic prostatectomy in men younger than 45 years diagnosed during early prostate cancer detection program.在早期前列腺癌检测项目中被诊断出的45岁以下男性患者行耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术。
Urology. 2004 Feb;63(2):337-41. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.09.032.
4
Operative details and oncological and functional outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 400 cases with a minimum of 12 months follow-up.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的手术细节、肿瘤学及功能结果:400例患者,至少随访12个月
Eur Urol. 2009 Jun;55(6):1358-66. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.12.035. Epub 2009 Jan 9.
5
Outcome and complications of radical prostatectomy in patients with PSA <10 ng/ml: comparison between the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach.前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)<10 ng/ml患者行根治性前列腺切除术的结果及并发症:耻骨后、会阴及腹腔镜入路的比较
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2002;5(4):285-90. doi: 10.1038/sj.pcan.4500605.
6
[Stool behaviour and local pain after radical perineal and retroperitoneal prostatectomy].[根治性会阴和腹膜后前列腺切除术后的排便行为与局部疼痛]
Aktuelle Urol. 2011 Nov;42(6):368-73. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1271542. Epub 2011 Nov 16.
7
The anatomic radical perineal prostatectomy: an outcomes-based evolution.解剖性根治性会阴前列腺切除术:基于结果的演变。
Eur Urol. 2007 Jul;52(1):81-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.10.041. Epub 2006 Oct 30.
8
Seminal vesicle-sparing perineal radical prostatectomy improves early functional results in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.保留精囊的会阴根治性前列腺切除术可改善低危前列腺癌患者的早期功能结果。
BJU Int. 2007 Nov;100(5):1050-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07123.x. Epub 2007 Aug 30.
9
Radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon comparison of retropubic, perineal, and robotic approaches.根治性前列腺切除术:单一外科医生对耻骨后、会阴及机器人辅助手术入路的比较
Can J Urol. 2007 Jun;14(3):3566-70.
10
Selective versus standard ligature of the deep venous complex during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: effects on continence, blood loss, and margin status.腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中深部静脉丛的选择性结扎与标准结扎:对控尿、失血及切缘状态的影响
Eur Urol. 2009 Jun;55(6):1377-83. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.02.009. Epub 2009 Feb 14.

引用本文的文献

1
The evolution and resurgence of perineal prostatectomy in the robotic surgical era.机器人手术时代会阴前列腺切除术的发展与复兴。
World J Urol. 2020 Apr;38(4):821-828. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-03004-1. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
2
Recovery of urinary function after robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical perineal prostatectomy for early-stage prostate cancer.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术与根治性会阴前列腺切除术治疗早期前列腺癌后尿功能的恢复情况
Int Urol Nephrol. 2018 Dec;50(12):2187-2191. doi: 10.1007/s11255-018-2013-8. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
3
Is Radical Perineal Prostatectomy a Viable Therapeutic Option for Intermediate- and High-risk Prostate Cancer?
根治性会阴前列腺切除术是中高危前列腺癌的可行治疗选择吗?
J Korean Med Sci. 2015 Nov;30(11):1631-7. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.11.1631. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
4
The effects of retropubic and perineal radical prostatectomy techniques on postoperative urinary continence after surgery: Results of 196 patients.耻骨后和会阴根治性前列腺切除术技术对术后尿失禁的影响:196例患者的结果。
Turk J Urol. 2013 Sep;39(3):147-52. doi: 10.5152/tud.2013.031.
5
Radical perineal prostatectomy - the contemporary resurgence of a genuinely minimally invasive procedure: Procedure outline. Comparison of the advantages, disadvantages, and outcomes of different surgical techniques of treating organ-confined prostate cancer (PCa). A literature review with special focus on perineal prostatectomy.根治性会阴前列腺切除术——一种真正微创术式的当代复兴:手术概述。比较治疗局限性前列腺癌(PCa)的不同手术技术的优缺点及结果。一项特别关注会阴前列腺切除术的文献综述。
Cent European J Urol. 2012;65(4):188-94. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2012.04.art2. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
6
Experience with radical perineal prostatectomy in the treatment of localized prostate cancer.根治性经会阴前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌的经验。
Ther Adv Urol. 2012 Jun;4(3):125-31. doi: 10.1177/1756287212441497.