Department of Developmental Psychology, VU University, Van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Pediatr Diabetes. 2011 May;12(3 Pt 2):258-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2010.00691.x. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
To determine the underlying factor structure of diabetes specific support using a modified diabetes family social support questionnaire, the M-DSSQ-Family, in one half of a sample of adolescents with type 1 diabetes, confirm it in the second half, test invariance in factor structure across gender and age, and test the reliability of the resulting scales.
The study included 11-19 yr old youngsters with type 1 diabetes, who are all on daily insulin injection or pump. A total of 437 adolescents (54.5% girls; mean age 14.7 yr; mean diabetes duration 6.1 yr) participated in the study.
Exploratory factor analyses in the first half of the random sample suggested five factors including 45 items with loading ≥ 0.40 and explaining 40% of item variance. Confirmatory factor analysis in the remainder of the sample showed good indices of fit with exclusion of only five items. The final model with five underlying factors including 'Guidance and Supervision (10 items, α = 0.84)', 'Encouragement of Self-care and Exercise (8 items, α = 0.82)', 'Support in Critical Situations (6 items, α = 0.90)', 'Nourishment (9 items, α = 0.84)', and 'Emotional Support (7 items, α = 0.81)' was confirmed across gender and age. In a second order factor analysis, all five factors loaded on one overall factor Diabetes Social Support-Family (α = 0.93).
The 40-item M-DSSQ-Family presented a different view of traditional aspect of diabetes social support from family which may be more fruitful for adolescents. In addition, it emerged as a valid and reliable measure of family support for Dutch adolescents with type 1 diabetes.
使用改良后的糖尿病家庭社会支持问卷(M-DSSQ-Family),在 1 型糖尿病青少年样本的一半中确定糖尿病特定支持的潜在因素结构,在另一半中进行验证,检验跨性别和年龄的因子结构不变性,并检验所得量表的可靠性。
本研究纳入了正在接受每日胰岛素注射或胰岛素泵治疗的 11-19 岁青少年。共有 437 名青少年(54.5%为女孩;平均年龄 14.7 岁;平均糖尿病病程 6.1 年)参与了研究。
在随机样本的前半部分进行的探索性因素分析表明,有五个因素包括 45 个负荷≥0.40 的项目,解释了 40%的项目方差。在样本的其余部分进行的验证性因素分析显示,仅排除五个项目后,拟合指数良好。最终模型包含五个潜在因素,包括“指导和监督(10 个项目,α=0.84)”、“鼓励自我护理和锻炼(8 个项目,α=0.82)”、“在危急情况下的支持(6 个项目,α=0.90)”、“营养支持(9 个项目,α=0.84)”和“情感支持(7 个项目,α=0.81)”,且在性别和年龄上均具有一致性。在二阶因子分析中,所有五个因素都加载在一个整体的糖尿病社会支持-家庭(α=0.93)因素上。
40 项 M-DSSQ-Family 从家庭角度呈现了糖尿病社会支持的一个不同传统方面,这可能对青少年更有益。此外,它作为一个有效的、可靠的荷兰 1 型糖尿病青少年家庭支持测量工具出现。