• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测结直肠肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术穿孔的相关因素。

Factors predictive of perforation during endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of colorectal tumors.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, South Korea.

出版信息

Endoscopy. 2011 Jul;43(7):573-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256339. Epub 2011 Mar 29.

DOI:10.1055/s-0030-1256339
PMID:21448852
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Although perforation of the colon is known as one of the main complications of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal tumor management, factors predictive of perforation have not been fully evaluated. This study aimed to determine the factors associated with perforation during colorectal ESD.

METHODS

Patients with colorectal tumors undergoing ESD were enrolled and their records were reviewed retrospectively. Age, sex, co-morbidity, medication history, procedure time, resection method, tumor size, location, gross morphology, the presence of fibrosis, and histologic findings were included as possible risk factors. In the cases where perforation had occurred, factors associated with the duration of hospitalization were analyzed.

RESULTS

One hundred eight lesions in 108 patients were eligible for inclusion in the study (68 patients were male; mean patient age was 63.01 ± 10.71 years). Mean tumor size was 27.59 ± 10.10 mm (range: 8 - 53 mm). Laterally spreading tumor was the most common type (75 %), followed by the protruding type (25 %). Procedure time was 61.95 ± 41.90 minutes (range: 5 - 198 minutes). Complete en bloc resection was achieved for 85 lesions (78.7 %). Perforation occurred in 22 patients (20.4 %). Multivariate analysis confirmed that tumor size [odds ratio (OR): 1.084; 95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.015 - 1.158; P = 0.017] and the presence of fibrosis (OR: 4.551; 95 %CI: 1.092 - 18.960; P = 0.037) were independent risk factors for perforation. All cases of perforation were managed with nonsurgical treatment. Younger age and abdominal pain appeared to be related to prolonged hospitalization.

CONCLUSION

Tumor size and fibrosis are important factors related to complications during colorectal ESD. Younger age and development of abdominal pain can predict the hospital course in patients with perforation after ESD.

摘要

背景与目的

虽然穿孔是内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)治疗结直肠肿瘤的主要并发症之一,但穿孔的预测因素尚未得到充分评估。本研究旨在确定与结直肠 ESD 穿孔相关的因素。

方法

纳入接受 ESD 治疗的结直肠肿瘤患者,回顾性分析其病历。年龄、性别、合并症、用药史、手术时间、切除方法、肿瘤大小、位置、大体形态、纤维化存在情况和组织学发现被纳入可能的危险因素。对穿孔发生的病例,分析与住院时间相关的因素。

结果

108 例患者的 108 个病变符合纳入研究标准(68 例为男性;患者平均年龄为 63.01±10.71 岁)。平均肿瘤大小为 27.59±10.10mm(范围:8-53mm)。侧向扩展型肿瘤最常见(75%),其次为隆起型(25%)。手术时间为 61.95±41.90 分钟(范围:5-198 分钟)。85 个病变实现了完全整块切除(78.7%)。22 例患者(20.4%)发生穿孔。多因素分析证实,肿瘤大小[比值比(OR):1.084;95%置信区间(CI):1.015-1.158;P=0.017]和纤维化存在(OR:4.551;95%CI:1.092-18.960;P=0.037)是穿孔的独立危险因素。所有穿孔病例均采用非手术治疗。年轻和腹痛似乎与住院时间延长有关。

结论

肿瘤大小和纤维化是结直肠 ESD 相关并发症的重要因素。年轻和腹痛的发生可以预测 ESD 后穿孔患者的住院病程。

相似文献

1
Factors predictive of perforation during endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of colorectal tumors.预测结直肠肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术穿孔的相关因素。
Endoscopy. 2011 Jul;43(7):573-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256339. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
2
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for treatment of rectal carcinoid tumors.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗直肠类癌肿瘤。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Jul;72(1):143-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.01.040. Epub 2010 Apr 9.
3
Retrospective study of technical aspects and complications of endoscopic submucosal dissection for laterally spreading tumors of the colorectum.回顾性研究内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗结直肠侧向发育型肿瘤的技术要点及并发症。
Endoscopy. 2010 Sep;42(9):714-22. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255654. Epub 2010 Aug 30.
4
Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗结直肠上皮性肿瘤的长期疗效。
Endoscopy. 2010 Sep;42(9):723-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255675. Epub 2010 Aug 30.
5
Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal tumors.内镜黏膜下剥离术与内镜黏膜切除术治疗大肠大肿瘤的比较。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Nov;23(11):1042-9. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32834aa47b.
6
Endoscopic submucosal dissection with or without snaring for colorectal neoplasms.内镜黏膜下剥离术联合或不联合圈套用于结直肠肿瘤。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Nov;74(5):1075-83. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1248. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
7
Matched case-control study comparing endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal tumors.内镜黏膜下剥离术与内镜黏膜切除术治疗结直肠肿瘤的配对病例对照研究。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Apr;27(4):728-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06942.x.
8
Clinicopathological factors associated with clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms.与结直肠上皮性肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术临床结局相关的临床病理因素
Endoscopy. 2009 Aug;41(8):679-83. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1214979. Epub 2009 Aug 10.
9
Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for laterally spreading tumors larger than 20 mm.内镜黏膜下剥离术和内镜黏膜切除术治疗直径大于 20mm 的侧向扩展肿瘤的临床疗效。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Apr;27(4):734-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06977.x.
10
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗结直肠上皮性肿瘤。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2010 Feb;53(2):161-8. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181b78cb6.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Meta-Analysis of the S-O Clip's Impact on Procedural Outcomes and Lesion-Specific Applications.优化内镜黏膜下剥离术:S-O夹对手术结果及特定病变应用影响的Meta分析
Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Jul 8. doi: 10.1007/s10620-025-09204-7.
2
Prophylactic Rectal ESD (Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection) Defect Closure and Post-ESD Clinical Outcomes: An International Multi-Center Study (with Video).预防性直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)缺损闭合及ESD术后临床结局:一项国际多中心研究(附视频)
Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Jun 24. doi: 10.1007/s10620-025-09123-7.
3
Comments on Risk Factors for Perforation in Endoscopic Treatment for Early Colorectal Cancer: A Nationwide ENTER-K Study: Reply.
关于早期结直肠癌内镜治疗中穿孔危险因素的评论:一项全国性的ENTER-K研究:回复
Gut Liver. 2025 Jul 15;19(4):629-630. doi: 10.5009/gnl250114. Epub 2025 Apr 21.
4
Efficacy of water pressure method for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: Propensity-score matching analysis.水压法在大肠内镜黏膜下剥离术中的疗效:倾向评分匹配分析
Endosc Int Open. 2025 Apr 4;13:a25442654. doi: 10.1055/a-2544-2654. eCollection 2025.
5
Experimental study of magnetic hydrogel assisted magnetic anchorguided endoscopic submucosal dissection in colonic tumors.磁性水凝胶辅助磁锚引导内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗结肠肿瘤的实验研究。
Technol Health Care. 2024;32(6):4505-4514. doi: 10.3233/THC-240653.
6
The Derivation and External Validation of a Fibrosis Risk Model for Colorectal Tumours Undergoing Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.接受内镜黏膜下剥离术的结直肠肿瘤纤维化风险模型的推导与外部验证
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 2;13(15):4517. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154517.
7
Clinical audit of endoscopic sub-mucosal dissection performed for complex lateral spreading colorectal tumors from a region non-endemic for colorectal cancer.对来自非结直肠癌流行地区的复杂侧向扩散型结直肠肿瘤进行内镜下黏膜下剥离术的临床审计。
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2024 Oct;43(5):1002-1011. doi: 10.1007/s12664-024-01631-0. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
8
Prophylactic effect of compression stockings for elevated D-dimer levels following endoscopic submucosal dissection.内镜黏膜下剥离术后应用弹力袜预防D-二聚体水平升高的效果
DEN Open. 2024 Jul 15;5(1):e405. doi: 10.1002/deo2.405. eCollection 2025 Apr.
9
A novel nomogram for the prediction of perforation during endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms.一种用于预测结直肠肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术中穿孔的新型列线图。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2024 Jul 1;30(4):228-235. doi: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_417_23. Epub 2024 May 6.
10
Characteristics of positive horizontal margins in patients who underwent colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.接受结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术患者的阳性水平切缘特征
DEN Open. 2023 Oct 12;4(1):e300. doi: 10.1002/deo2.300. eCollection 2024 Apr.