• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

农村身份对小儿肝移植健康结局的影响:对388例患者的单中心分析

Effects of rural status on health outcomes in pediatric liver transplantation: a single center analysis of 388 patients.

作者信息

Park K T, Nanda Pranav, Bensen Rachel, Strichartz Debra, Esquivel Carlos, Cox Kenneth

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Stanford University Medical Center, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Transplant. 2011 May;15(3):300-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2010.01452.x. Epub 2011 Mar 30.

DOI:10.1111/j.1399-3046.2010.01452.x
PMID:21450010
Abstract

Rural status of patients may impact health before and after pediatric LT. We used UI codes published by the USDA to stratify patients as urban or rural depending county residence. A total of 388 patients who had LT and who met criteria were included. Rejection, PTLD, and survival were used as primary outcome measures of post-LT health. UNOS Status 1 and PELD/MELD scores >20 were used as secondary outcome measures of poorer pre-LT health. Logistic regression models were run to determine associations. We did not find any statistically significant differences in pre- or post-LT outcomes with respect to rurality. Among rural patients, there was a general trend for decreased incidence of rejection (25.0% vs. 33.4%; OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.29-1.44), increased risk of PTLD (5.6% vs. 3.4%; OR 1.86, 95% CI 0.36-3.31), and decreased survival (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.34-2.13) after LT. Rural patients also tended to be sicker at the time of LT than patients from urban areas, with increased proportion of Status 1 (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.51-2.70) and PELD/MELD scores >20 (OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.59-2.45). From a single center experience, we conclude that rurality did not significantly affect health outcomes after LT, although a larger study may validate the general trends that rural patients may have decreased rejection, increased PTLD, and mortality, and be in poorer health at the time of LT.

摘要

患者的农村身份可能会在小儿肝移植前后影响健康。我们使用美国农业部公布的统一识别码,根据患者所在县的居住地将其分为城市或农村患者。共有388例接受肝移植且符合标准的患者被纳入研究。排斥反应、移植后淋巴细胞增生性疾病(PTLD)和生存率被用作肝移植后健康状况的主要结局指标。器官共享联合网络(UNOS)1级状态以及儿科终末期肝病评分(PELD)/终末期肝病模型评分(MELD)>20被用作肝移植前健康状况较差的次要结局指标。运用逻辑回归模型来确定相关性。我们没有发现农村身份在肝移植前后的结局方面存在任何统计学上的显著差异。在农村患者中,肝移植后排斥反应发生率降低(25.0%对33.4%;比值比[OR]0.64,95%置信区间[CI]0.29 - 1.44)、PTLD风险增加(5.6%对3.4%;OR 1.86,95% CI 0.36 - 3.31)以及生存率降低(OR 0.85,95% CI 0.34 - 2.13)存在总体趋势。农村患者在肝移植时也往往比城市地区的患者病情更重,1级状态的比例增加(OR 1.17,95% CI 0.51 - 2.70)以及PELD/MELD评分>20的比例增加(OR 1.20,95% CI 0.59 - 2.45)。从单一中心的经验来看,我们得出结论,农村身份在肝移植后并未显著影响健康结局,尽管更大规模的研究可能会证实农村患者可能出现排斥反应降低、PTLD增加以及死亡率增加且在肝移植时健康状况较差的总体趋势。

相似文献

1
Effects of rural status on health outcomes in pediatric liver transplantation: a single center analysis of 388 patients.农村身份对小儿肝移植健康结局的影响:对388例患者的单中心分析
Pediatr Transplant. 2011 May;15(3):300-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2010.01452.x. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
2
Geographical rural status and health outcomes in pediatric liver transplantation: an analysis of 6 years of national United Network of Organ Sharing Data.地理农村地位与小儿肝移植的健康结果:对国家器官共享联合网络 6 年数据的分析。
J Pediatr. 2013 Feb;162(2):313-8.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.07.015. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
3
The pediatric end-stage liver disease (PELD) model as a predictor of survival benefit and posttransplant survival in pediatric liver transplant recipients.小儿终末期肝病(PELD)模型作为小儿肝移植受者生存获益和移植后生存的预测指标。
Liver Transpl. 2006 Mar;12(3):475-80. doi: 10.1002/lt.20703.
4
Utility of MELD and Child-Turcotte-Pugh scores and the Canadian waitlisting algorithm in predicting short-term survival after liver transplant.终末期肝病模型(MELD)和Child-Turcotte-Pugh评分以及加拿大等待名单算法在预测肝移植后短期生存率方面的效用。
Clin Invest Med. 2004 Aug;27(4):162-7.
5
Long-term outcomes of pediatric living donor liver transplantation at a single institution.单一机构小儿活体肝移植的长期预后
Pediatr Transplant. 2010 Nov;14(7):870-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2010.01357.x.
6
MELD score versus conventional UNOS status in predicting short-term mortality after liver transplantation.肝移植后预测短期死亡率的MELD评分与传统的器官共享联合网络(UNOS)状态对比
Transpl Int. 2005 Jan;18(1):65-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2004.00024.x.
7
Liver transplantation in children weighing 5 kg or less: analysis of the UNOS database.体重5千克及以下儿童的肝移植:美国器官共享联合网络数据库分析
Pediatr Transplant. 2011 Sep;15(6):650-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2011.01549.x. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
8
Long-term patient outcome and quality of life after liver transplantation: analysis of 20-year survivors.肝移植后 20 年幸存者的长期患者预后和生活质量分析。
Ann Surg. 2010 Oct;252(4):652-61. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181f5f23a.
9
Impact of implementation of the MELD scoring system on the prevalence and incidence of chronic renal disease following liver transplantation.终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分系统的实施对肝移植后慢性肾病患病率和发病率的影响。
Liver Transpl. 2006 May;12(5):754-61. doi: 10.1002/lt.20686.
10
Rural/urban differences in health care utilization and place of death for persons with respiratory illness in the last year of life.生命最后一年中呼吸系统疾病患者在医疗保健利用和死亡地点方面的城乡差异。
Rural Remote Health. 2010 Apr-Jun;10(2):1349. Epub 2010 Apr 30.