Loisance D, Benvenuti C, Dubois Randé J L, Deleuze P, Castaigne A, Cachera J P
Department of Surgical Research, CHU Henri Mondor, Créteil, France.
Int J Cardiol. 1990 Jul;28 Suppl 1:S23-7. doi: 10.1016/0167-5273(90)90147-w.
Immediate cardiac transplantation, or urgent implantation of devices for mechanical support of the failing heart, has been shown to be effective as life-saving procedures in patients with cardiogenic shock unresponsive to maximal sympathomimetic treatment. The intravenous administration of enoximone in these patients, in addition to previous inotropic support, should permit a 'buying of time' strategy, leading to a reduction in the need for complex, invasive and costly techniques, such as artificial hearts. In addition, it should permit improved selection of candidates for cardiac transplantation. A prospective study was started in 1985 to obtain data on the haemodynamic and clinical efficacy of intravenous enoximone in these critically ill patients, and to determine the time gained for evaluation of the need for urgent transplantation. Cardiac index rose from 1.82 +/- 0.26 litres/minute/m2 to 2.67 +/- 0.56 litres/minute/m2 after 30 minutes, while pulmonary capillary wedge pressure decreased from 29.9 +/- 7 mm Hg to 18.0 +/- 7 mm Hg (n = 30). This early beneficial effect waned progressively after 6 hours. Prior to the next intravenous infusion at 8 hours, cardiac index was 2.07 +/- 0.53 litres/minute/m2 and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was 25 +/- 8.5 mm Hg. Only four patients could not wait for a biological graft and had to be implanted with a complete artificial heart (3 patients), or a ventricular assist device (1 patient). In all, 30 patients improved and their increased survival allowed a re-evaluation for cardiac transplantation itself; 13 were rapidly (1.7 days; range 0.5-5) confirmed as good candidates. As a whole, this strategy compares favourably with the results of a strategy based on mechanical bridging alone.
对于对最大剂量拟交感神经药物治疗无反应的心源性休克患者,立即进行心脏移植或紧急植入支持衰竭心脏的机械装置已被证明是有效的救命措施。在这些患者中,除了先前的正性肌力支持外,静脉注射依诺昔酮应能采用“赢得时间”策略,从而减少对诸如人工心脏等复杂、侵入性且昂贵技术的需求。此外,它应能改善心脏移植候选者的选择。1985年启动了一项前瞻性研究,以获取静脉注射依诺昔酮对这些重症患者的血流动力学和临床疗效的数据,并确定为评估紧急移植需求而赢得的时间。30分钟后心脏指数从1.82±0.26升/分钟/平方米升至2.67±0.56升/分钟/平方米,而肺毛细血管楔压从29.9±7毫米汞柱降至18.0±7毫米汞柱(n = 30)。6小时后这种早期有益效果逐渐减弱。在8小时进行下一次静脉输注之前,心脏指数为2.07±0.53升/分钟/平方米,肺毛细血管楔压为25±8.5毫米汞柱。只有4名患者无法等待生物移植物,不得不植入全人工心脏(3例)或心室辅助装置(1例)。总共有30名患者病情改善,他们存活率的提高使得能够对心脏移植本身进行重新评估;13名患者迅速(1.7天;范围0.5 - 5天)被确认为合适的候选者。总体而言,该策略与仅基于机械桥接的策略结果相比更具优势。