• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术部位遗留异物的刑事责任

[Penal liability from retained foreign body inside the surgical site].

作者信息

Angiò L G, Ventura Spagnolo E, Pirrone G, Cardia G

机构信息

Universita degli Studi di Messina, Italy.

出版信息

G Chir. 2011 Mar;32(3):153-8.

PMID:21453598
Abstract

The Authors focus on the liability of the surgery team members in the case they inadvertently forget behind in the patient's body a foreign object, which causes injuries and/or death. The Authors underline that, according to the current case law regarding medical malpractice, both the main surgeon and their assistant/subordinate are liable for engaging in a markedly imprudent and/or negligent conduct, such as not double-checking scrupulously the surgical site before its closure in order to highlight forgotten foreign bodies. As well, the Authors underline that either the circulator nurse or the theatre nurse can be considered punishable by law when that medical error occurs, even if they are responsible for the count of the instruments used in the course of the surgery. Conversely, the main surgeon and his or her assistant are always directly responsible, due to the fact that the nurses' count procedure represents merely an additional control measure, without substituting at all the check the surgeons must obligatory conduct on the surgical site. Finally, the Authors point out that, as the count procedure is performed by the members of a surgical team, where a hierarchy-based relationship rules, the main surgeon is the liable for any preventable and avoidable adverse event provoked by the nursing staff as a consequence of the objective responsibility due to culpa in eligendo and culpa in vigilando.

摘要

作者关注手术团队成员在无意中将异物遗留在患者体内并导致伤害和/或死亡的情况下应承担的责任。作者强调,根据现行关于医疗事故的判例法,主刀医生及其助手/下属都应对明显轻率和/或疏忽的行为负责,比如在关闭手术切口前没有仔细再次检查手术部位以发现遗留的异物。同样,作者强调,当发生这种医疗差错时,巡回护士或器械护士即使负责手术过程中所用器械的清点,也可能会被依法惩处。相反,主刀医生及其助手始终直接负责,因为护士的清点程序仅仅是一种额外的控制措施,根本不能替代外科医生必须在手术部位进行的检查。最后,作者指出,由于清点程序是由手术团队成员执行的,而手术团队中存在基于等级的关系,主刀医生应对护理人员因选任过失和监管过失导致的客观责任所引发的任何可预防和可避免的不良事件负责。

相似文献

1
[Penal liability from retained foreign body inside the surgical site].手术部位遗留异物的刑事责任
G Chir. 2011 Mar;32(3):153-8.
2
The vicarious liability of a surgeon for a negligent anesthesiologist.外科医生对疏忽大意的麻醉师的替代责任。
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1993;44(2):61-8.
3
[Responsibility in medical collaborations and care establishments].[医疗合作与医疗机构中的责任]
Bull Acad Natl Med. 1998;182(3):533-9; discussion 539-40.
4
[Retained foreign bodies from the point of view of the jurist].[从法学家角度看体内遗留异物]
Chirurg. 2007 Jan;78(1):28-34. doi: 10.1007/s00104-006-1280-6.
5
Risk factors for retained instruments and sponges after surgery.术后器械和纱布遗留的危险因素。
N Engl J Med. 2003 Jan 16;348(3):229-35. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa021721.
6
[Legal liability of subordinate physicians, legal liability for management responsibility from the jurisprudence viewpoint].[下级医师的法律责任,从法理学视角看管理责任的法律责任]
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena). 1995 Nov;89(6):613-20.
7
[Legal liability of the hospital].[医院的法律责任]
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena). 1995 Nov;89(6):609-12.
8
[Laparoscopic surgery: from clinic to legal medicine].[腹腔镜手术:从临床到法医学]
Minerva Chir. 2004 Dec;59(6):589-96.
9
[Medico-legal controversies in obstetrics and gynecology: an important current problem].[妇产科领域的法医学争议:当前一个重要问题]
Minerva Ginecol. 1995 Sep;47(9):401-7.
10
[Legal settlements of medical accidents].
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 2001 Mar;102(3):299-302.