Suppr超能文献

一项针对新生儿重症监护病房凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌败血症治疗的七年调查:经验性治疗可能不需要万古霉素。

A seven-year survey of management of coagulase-negative staphylococcal sepsis in the neonatal intensive care unit: vancomycin may not be necessary as empiric therapy.

机构信息

Department of Neonatology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Neonatology. 2011;100(2):180-5. doi: 10.1159/000324852. Epub 2011 Apr 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The typical empiric therapy for coagulase-negative staphylococcal (CONS) sepsis includes vancomycin. In our neonatal intensive care unit, we have consistently avoided the use of vancomycin to treat CONS sepsis, except for specific cases, and have used instead cefazolin as empiric agent.

OBJECTIVES

The clinical outcome of infants with CONS sepsis was evaluated in relation to the susceptibility of CONS blood isolates to cefazolin over a period of 7 years.

METHODS

Clinical characteristics, symptoms of sepsis and antibiotic use were studied retrospectively. Susceptibility of CONS blood isolates to cefazolin was determined by E-test.

RESULTS

Of 163 infants with proven CONS sepsis, 121/140 (86%) infants with a cefazolin-susceptible (minimum inhibition concentration (MIC) ≤8 mg/l) and 21/23 (91%) with a cefazolin-resistant (MIC ≥32 mg/l) blood isolate were treated with cefazolin. 21 (13%) infants were switched to vancomycin, in only 3 of them CONS had become resistant to cefazolin. The majority (81%) of the infants with a good response to cefazolin had the indwelling central venous catheter removed, in contrast to only 22% of the infants with cefazolin treatment failure. Median cefazolin MIC values were 0.75-2 mg/l during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

The great majority of infants with CONS sepsis was successfully treated with cefazolin. The use of vancomycin could be restricted to specific cases. Despite the consistent use of cefazolin in neonatal CONS sepsis over an extended period of time, cefazolin MIC values remained low and in the susceptible range. Removal of the central venous catheter in infants with clinical symptoms of sepsis is an important therapeutic measure.

摘要

背景

凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(CONS)败血病的典型经验性治疗包括万古霉素。在我们的新生儿重症监护病房,我们一直避免使用万古霉素治疗 CONS 败血病,除非是特殊情况,而是使用头孢唑林作为经验性药物。

目的

在 7 年的时间里,评估 CONS 血培养分离株对头孢唑林的敏感性与 CONS 败血病患儿临床结局的关系。

方法

回顾性研究临床特征、败血症症状和抗生素使用情况。通过 E 试验测定 CONS 血培养分离株对头孢唑林的敏感性。

结果

在 163 例确诊为 CONS 败血病的婴儿中,121/140(86%)头孢唑林敏感(最低抑菌浓度(MIC)≤8mg/L)和 21/23(91%)头孢唑林耐药(MIC≥32mg/L)血培养分离株的婴儿接受了头孢唑林治疗。21 名(13%)婴儿改用万古霉素,其中只有 3 名 CONS 对头孢唑林耐药。大多数(81%)对头孢唑林反应良好的婴儿拔除了中心静脉导管,而头孢唑林治疗失败的婴儿只有 22%。在研究期间,头孢唑林的 MIC 值中位数为 0.75-2mg/L。

结论

绝大多数 CONS 败血病患儿成功接受头孢唑林治疗。万古霉素的使用可以限制在特定情况下。尽管在新生儿 CONS 败血病中长时间持续使用头孢唑林,但头孢唑林 MIC 值仍保持较低且处于敏感范围。在有败血症临床症状的婴儿中,拔除中心静脉导管是一项重要的治疗措施。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验