Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE), Brussels, Belgium.
Health Econ. 2011 Jun;20(6):675-87. doi: 10.1002/hec.1624.
Over the last 20 years, acute-care hospitals in most OECD countries have built up costly overcapacities. From the perspective of economic policy, it is desirable to know how hospitals of different ownership forms respond to changes in demand and are probably best suited to deal with existing overcapacities. This article examines ownership-specific differences in the responsiveness to changes in demand for hospital services in Germany between 1996 and 2006. With respect to the speed of adaptation to increasing demand, the study finds for-profit ownership to be superior to public and nonprofit ownership. However, contrary to other ownership types, for-profits also tend to expand in markets with decreasing demand - mainly through conversions of publicly owned hospitals. Thus, in short term, the privatization of the hospital sector may slow down the reduction of excess capacities and be therefore socially wasteful.
在过去的 20 年中,大多数经合组织国家的急性医疗机构已经建立了昂贵的过剩产能。从经济政策的角度来看,了解不同所有制形式的医院如何应对需求变化以及可能最适合处理现有过剩产能是很有必要的。本文研究了德国在 1996 年至 2006 年期间,医院服务需求变化对不同所有制形式医院的反应程度的差异。在适应需求增长的速度方面,研究发现营利性医院优于公立和非营利医院。然而,与其他所有制类型相反,营利性医院也倾向于在需求下降的市场中扩张——主要是通过将公立医院进行转换。因此,从短期来看,医院部门的私有化可能会减缓过剩产能的减少,从而造成社会浪费。